|
|
|
|||||||
| Canon Exhilaration Of Sight |
|
|
| View Poll Results: which lens do you prefer? | |||
| EF 75-300 USM III f4.5-5.6 |
   
|
7 | 6.25% |
| EF 70-200 f4L |
  
|
105 | 93.75% |
| Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
27th March 2004
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Changi
Posts: 145
|
75-300vs70-200
Canon EF 75-300 USM III vs Canon EF 70-200 f4L
which one do you prefer? |
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (SengKang)
Posts: 2,992
|
I pretty sure that if money is not an issue, most will choose the 70-200mm F4 L ?
 |
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
of course 70-200 F4L
|
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Changi
Posts: 145
|
hmmm..wad if u onli haf enuff $$ to get one lens? will u get the 70-200 bcos it has the L? or will u get the 75-300 for its longer zoom?
|
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 829
|
ya.. because it has the L. its definately better in optics...
|
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
L of course!
 |
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 423
|
Not true....look at http://www.pbase.com/zevs/jennifer_brown and you will see that 75-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM is so much better on concert photography than a 70-200 f2.8L IS !! Last edited by cookiez; 27th March 2004 at 10:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (SengKang)
Posts: 2,992
|
 |
|
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 423
|
Nope, just felt that saying L lens is better in optics is not always true... just personal opinion....no fight pls.... |
|
|
|
|
27th March 2004
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 332
|
look at the price.. these two lens are totally different category... so non-comparable..
if u give me free and i only gotta take 1, of cos L |
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North SG
Posts: 862
|
...... L ........
|
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,573
|
even with the 70-200L i will still get the 75-300 IS for those times when need to take soem discreet street candids.
|
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#15 |
|
Gallery Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 300
|
hi,
I had the same question just 2 months back.. and finally bought my EF70-200 F4 L... there is no regret despite it's shorter range.... i just took some test shots and am just amazed at the sharpness and colour .... really live up to it's name... and just because everybody everywhere were talking about the back or front focusing problem at the short 70 mm range.. i took a whole night yesterday just testing it.. and am glad to report i got a good copy.. good luck |
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
|
BTW, you can't judge sharpness of a photo by looking at a resized one. I can definitely say that the 70-200 F2.8 IS is VERY much better than the 75-300 F4-5.6 IS. How I know? I have both of them. |
|
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 788
|
|
|
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hillview, Singapore
Posts: 161
|
i happen to own both..  |
|
|
|
|
28th March 2004
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 569
|
75-300 IS USM won't stand a chance against the 70-200f4L. Performance wise, etc etc. So much so that the price difference and extra 100mm is not part of the equation.
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
