Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

  1. #1

    Default raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    hi
    Im using canon 1000d.
    Have canon 50mm lens
    And canon 17-85mm lens.

    A friend reecommended Raynox one whereas the uncle at this shop said Vitacon 0.5x is good since it comes with both wideangle and macro adaptor. but ive not seen any pictures around for vitacon one. Pls help!

  2. #2
    Moderator Octarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pasir Ris
    Posts
    12,388

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    Please use the search function (upper right hand) and read what other people have said already many times. In a nutshell:
    Raynox: is used by many people in Macro section (check their pic) and they are happy.
    Vitacon: is used by many newbies, afterwards we see the complaints about lousy image quality and later we see the offers in Buy&Sell section. Many times we also see the stories of being ripped off / overcharged for those Vitacon thingies.
    Following "shop uncle's advice" has produced many angry stories here. Up to you whether you want to add another one

    Beside this: what do you want? Macro or wide angle? 17mm is already quite wide, anything wider requires quality glass, not just some adapter. If 17mm is wide enough then Vitacon's wide angle has no value to you. Just a paperweight.
    Last edited by Octarine; 25th March 2010 at 11:40 AM.
    EOS

  3. #3
    Senior Member NovJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    ~Sunny Little Island~
    Posts
    5,651

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    My advice is for you to take the Raynox instead of Vitacon.

    Why? Raynox is to help you turn a non-macro lens to macro capability, as long as the lens diameter is within 52mm to 67mm. Like Octarine mentioned, you already have a 17-85mm lens, where 17mm is already a good wide angle so no point wasting money to get the vitacon.

    I've used Raynox 250 DCR on both my CZ 50mm/1.4 and Canon EF 100mm/2.8 lens and both works great without sacrificing f/stops. Maybe for new users, you'll find hard to control the shallow focus depth and short focal distance with Raynox stack on. For wide angle, I have my trusty Tokina 11-16/2.8 lens to shoot with .

  4. #4
    Senior Member Numnumball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Central
    Posts
    13,914

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    Get the Raynox
    I turned PRO in diaper chg!
    My Flickr|My Son

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jurong West St65
    Posts
    2,578

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    Raynox DCR 250 + your 50mm lens will be lightweight macro setup suitable for handheld shooting.

    The 8 Diopter magnification (approx 3x) for Raynox is good too.
    D810-Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro |Raynox DCR-250
    David

  6. #6

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    Get the raynox.

    Even if you get tired of it, it is much easier to resell the raynox than the vitacon, which should say something about things.

  7. #7

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    Don't waste your money on vitacon. Rubbish.

  8. #8

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    It's called vitaCON for a reason.
    Alpha

  9. #9

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    crap.

    i ended up buying the UNI Plus Tube for 50mm instead cos Alan Photo recommended.

    hmm not sure if i made the right choice now

  10. #10
    Senior Member NovJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    ~Sunny Little Island~
    Posts
    5,651

    Default Re: raynox 250 or vitacon 0.5x macro coverter?

    You got to try out yourself to see if you made the right choice. My bet's still on Raynox .

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •