Under what law/statute/case which you gather that taking photos of people under the age of 21 is ILLEGAL?Originally Posted by Pro Image
illegal acts and legal capacity to enter into a contract fall under the separate realms of criminal and civil liability.
for criminal, can point me to the law which says its ILLEGAL to take photos of a person UNDER 21?Originally Posted by Pro Image
for civil liability, first it is unclear under the current case law that the age of a minor is 21 (although probably so, according to a leading commentator)
second, even if a minor contracts, it doesn't mean the contract is without legal effect, even if it means the minor may not be bound by the contract.
in any event, under what legal right does the parent/legal guardian assert to sue the organisers? contract? tort? others?Originally Posted by Pro Image
the answer is that its more than it meets the eye