ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


View Poll Results: Do you use exposure bracketing?
What's that? 3 5.56%
Sometimes, when the shot is very important and I can afford the time to take so multiple shots at a static subject. 34 62.96%
All the time, I always fire in a 3 shot burst mode 3 5.56%
No way man, I study the scene, meter, study, meter, study, meter.....then I shoot and its definitely a shot with good exposure. 14 25.93%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

 
Thread Tools
Old 7th March 2004   #1
Splutter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gim Boon Tai
Posts: 2,819
Default Do you use exposure bracketing?

Hi, I was wondering if anyone really uses the exposure bracketing feature. Would it actually impair the exposure judgement skill of a photographer?
Splutter is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #2
Flare
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Batok West Avenue 2
Posts: 1,739
Default

Well, I guess I'm too reliant on the digital format, electronic view finders and instant preview. Thus i lack the skill in exposure judgement, thus, I do bracket when I can, but usually it's more like shoot, see, reshoot and reshoot.
Flare is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #3
Sion
Senior Member
 
Sion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 新天地
Posts: 1,014
Default

Originally Posted by Splutter
Hi, I was wondering if anyone really uses the exposure bracketing feature.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Both with film camera before and dslr now.

Originally Posted by Splutter
Would it actually impair the exposure judgement skill of a photographer?
Why would you want to acquire "exposure judgement skill" when you could have something like 12-zone exposure evaluation these days? You're not using a prewar camera with no built-in light meter are you
:-)

I rather concentrate on looking for the right subject, getting the right light on it, composing it creatively and conceptualizing it in a meaningul way.
__________________
三分天注定, 七分靠打拼, 爱拼才会赢!
Sion is online now  
Sponsored Link
Old 7th March 2004   #4
linse
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 314
Default

You need to add another option

"I shoot RAW so I don't need to do exposure bracketing."
linse is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #5
clive
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,573
Default

only when the shot is deemed 2b rather important
clive is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #6
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

U should include another option - "No bec I dun use slides"

Coz if using negative film, the bracketing effects are not obvious due to the wide latitude of negative film. I tried before doing a +/-1-stop 3-shot bracket and didn't see any difference when the shot was finally developed. I suppose the photo studio might have compensated for it but if it were anything as obvious as in slides (where no compnesation at the studio will be done), I would have seen it..... and I never used slides before anyway.....
TME is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #7
djork
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hong Kong, Pokfulam
Posts: 1,195
Default

Originally Posted by linse
You need to add another option

"I shoot RAW so I don't need to do exposure bracketing."
really? wow i didn't know that
__________________
Canon 300D, 30D, 5D. 17-40 f4 L, 24-105 f4 L, 70-200 f2.8 L IS
djork is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #8
Kit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,010
Default

I seldom do bracketing but I do shoot contrasting scenes using various exposures to do "multiple exposure" in post editing.
Kit is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #9
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

Originally Posted by Kit
I seldom do bracketing but I do shoot contrasting scenes using various exposures to do "multiple exposure" in post editing.

Won't that be easier to bracket?
TME is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #10
Kit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,010
Default

They're essentially the same but for bracketing, you usually do 1 under and 1 over and the exposure differences is fixed. Sometimes I need 1 stop over, 2 stops under, etc or at times I don't even need both, just either under or over will do depending on the situation. More freedom not to use auto bracketing.
Kit is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #11
linse
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by djork
really? wow i didn't know that
You have about 2 stops of latitude either way with Nikon's NEF raw format. That's provided you don't blow out the highlights.
linse is offline  
Old 7th March 2004   #12
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

Originally Posted by Kit
They're essentially the same but for bracketing, you usually do 1 under and 1 over and the exposure differences is fixed. Sometimes I need 1 stop over, 2 stops under, etc or at times I don't even need both, just either under or over will do depending on the situation. More freedom not to use auto bracketing.

Hmm..... I dun think any camera has these features.... kekeke....... might be a good idea to pitch to the camera companies...
TME is offline  
Old 9th March 2004   #13
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

I "burst" more often than doing exposure bracketing when the lighting conditions are not good. this helps increase the chances of getting sharp pics when I don't have a tripod with me.
mpenza is offline  
Old 9th March 2004   #14
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

Originally Posted by mpenza
I "burst" more often than doing exposure bracketing when the lighting conditions are not good. this helps increase the chances of getting sharp pics when I don't have a tripod with me.

Hmm... if I got DSLR will also burst mode lor.......... but on film very expensive to do so... thanks anyway!
TME is offline  
Old 9th March 2004   #15
MooEy
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 170
Default

usually i bracket only when the camera is on the tripod and i cannot be sure of the exposure. still figuring out how to use the camera auto-bracket, now just change shutter time manually.

anyway hor, negative sometimes oso need bracketing. when u shooting from behind a piece of glass(eg window) at night and u wan capture the reflection from the glass as well as the light from outside, need bracket alot, then slowly choose the one u like.

~MooEy~
MooEy is offline  
Old 9th March 2004   #16
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

Originally Posted by MooEy
usually i bracket only when the camera is on the tripod and i cannot be sure of the exposure. still figuring out how to use the camera auto-bracket, now just change shutter time manually.

anyway hor, negative sometimes oso need bracketing. when u shooting from behind a piece of glass(eg window) at night and u wan capture the reflection from the glass as well as the light from outside, need bracket alot, then slowly choose the one u like.

~MooEy~
Your cam should have an exposure mode that is dedicated for bracketing... look in the manual. The lower end cams have a fixed step for the bracketing e.g. +/-0.5EV, whereas the higher end ones u can set the bracketign value - +/-0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0EV etc...
TME is offline  
Old 31st March 2004   #17
coke21
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East
Posts: 728
Default

Think exposure bracketing is good when you first start off with the camera. It will allow you to figure out how the camera exposes etc and for you to learn how much to compensate intially.

After that, guess when you figure out how the camera responses, you can focus your attention on just taking the shot you want.

Bracketing will be expensive for film, for DSLRs, guess all you need is a bigger or more CF cards....
coke21 is offline  
Old 31st March 2004   #18
ST1100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
Default

i rarely bracket, but am beginning to think it might be a good idea.

1) Backlit subjects. Moving, event-type candids. There isn't time to spot-meter, and and the degree of backlighting is constantly changing (bcoz everyone is moving around). i get around this by 'guessing' how much to over-expose. Or take a risk by taking one grey exposure and set the camera to manual.

2) Focus and recompose. Not sure about your cameras, but for mine, i'm quite sure the exposure is locked together when focus is acquired. If recomposition changes the degree of backlighting substantially, the exposure is usually out, by a lot.

Shooting RAW doesn't help much. You gain maybe 1/2 stop of detail in the highlights, but it's usually the shadows that are giving problems when backlit.
ST1100 is offline  
Old 1st April 2004   #19
smallaperture
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Catchment Area
Posts: 2,423
Default Bracketing

These days, the metering of the camera is so good that we hardly need bracketing, except for extreme contrasty situations, where some exp comp would do nicely. Often, centre-weighted or sport metering would do the trick.

In today's context, for film, you will have to change film in no time and somewhat costly. Those who do bracketing should go digital rightaway. Same thing goes for those who fires off continuously, also known as machine-gun style shooting.
smallaperture is offline  
Old 1st April 2004   #20
di0nysus
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: macpherson
Posts: 987
Default

IMO, tripod is a must.

else it'll be very difficult to merge the pictures later.
di0nysus is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13384 seconds with 8 queries