Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: wide angle lenses

  1. #1
    Member jasonlingwj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    165

    Default wide angle lenses

    hi bros out there,
    anyone has any suggestions bout good third party wide angle lenses?

  2. #2

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    There are lots of article regarding this topic. Do some research on it.

    I recommend Tokina 11-16 for you and your D90.
    D300/700/3S|14-24|24-70|70-200|17-55|16|14|24PC|28|50|85|105M|135DC|500|18-200|24-120|200-400|T11-16

  3. #3

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    im looking for WA lenses too. been researching and asking around.
    just to share with you,

    many recommend Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 and Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6. havent gotten much review on Nikon's 10-24mm.

    i find it hard to choose which to get. each have their pros and cons.

    Tokina - its a f2.8! but limited range.
    Sigma - f4. slow lens. but many say you're not gonna use as an action lens etc. price is good.
    Nikon - expensive but has a wide zoom range.

    conclusion for me, i prob go for Tokina or Sigma. budget problem.
    on top of that, im thinking of getting a standard zoom to go along with it. either Sigma's 17-70mm f2.8 or Tokina's 16-50mm f2.8.

    Gurus out there.. pls advice. thank you!
    What i need is the skill and vision of a pro... not a pro camera!

  4. #4

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Well, there's the path not often travelled.

    Zenitar 16mm f2.8
    http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=zenitar+16mm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/zenit/zenitar-16mm.htm
    Don't worry about those QC issues, I got mine a month ago, and it is able to reach infinity focus.
    It's soft at f2.8, but really sharp once you hit f4 onwards.
    Costs $300 flat, got it over eBay.

    Just to give you an idea of how wide 16mm is on a cropped sensor.

    | Changi Beach, f22, 1/60, ISO400 |

    There's the Peleng 8mm too, but be wary of the image quality.

    Happy Researching!,
    gibss
    Last edited by gibss; 4th January 2010 at 10:19 PM.
    Nikon & Pentax :)

  5. #5
    Senior Member giantcanopy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    6,232

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    If u r doing landscapes most of the time with the wide lens, then the f2.8 doesn't matter cause u be using a smaller aperture for more dof mostly.

  6. #6

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    I use the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-f/5.6.

  7. #7
    Senior Member NovJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    ~Sunny Little Island~
    Posts
    5,651

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    I recommend the tokina 11-16/2.8 as it is useful during low light conditions. Moreover, it is pretty sharp throughout the frame.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bedok
    Posts
    432

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Just wonder if uwa are better and price diff?

  9. #9

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    i have decided to get the Tokina. mainly because of its wide aperture as compared to the Sigma. i do see myself taking some shots at functions and event. so prob a f2.8 will come in handy. used to use the 18-200mm VR often at such times. but felt that it isnt wide enough for certain group shots especially in confined areas.

    looking at 17-55mm f2.8 as well.

    hole in the pocket getting bigger!
    What i need is the skill and vision of a pro... not a pro camera!

  10. #10

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by VainKid View Post
    Just wonder if uwa are better and price diff?
    dun quite understand your question bro..

    better in wat sense? price wise varies with brands,quality etc
    What i need is the skill and vision of a pro... not a pro camera!

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Posts
    14,002

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by fergo View Post
    im looking for WA lenses too. been researching and asking around.
    just to share with you,

    many recommend Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 and Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6. havent gotten much review on Nikon's 10-24mm.

    i find it hard to choose which to get. each have their pros and cons.

    Tokina - its a f2.8! but limited range.
    Sigma - f4. slow lens. but many say you're not gonna use as an action lens etc. price is good.
    Nikon - expensive but has a wide zoom range.

    conclusion for me, i prob go for Tokina or Sigma. budget problem.
    on top of that, im thinking of getting a standard zoom to go along with it. either Sigma's 17-70mm f2.8 or Tokina's 16-50mm f2.8.

    Gurus out there.. pls advice. thank you!
    How fast u want to be? I've used f/4 lenses in the past and honestly they're not at all slow even in dim lighting.
    Canon EOS 5D, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.2 L, 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, 600EX-RT. Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Posts
    14,002

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by jasonlingwj View Post
    hi bros out there,
    anyone has any suggestions bout good third party wide angle lenses?
    Tamron's 10-24, Sigma's 10-20 are very gd UWAs for APS-C cameras.
    Canon EOS 5D, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.2 L, 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, 600EX-RT. Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX.

  13. #13

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoweagle View Post
    How fast u want to be? I've used f/4 lenses in the past and honestly they're not at all slow even in dim lighting.
    hahha... dun get me wrong. im not saying f4 is a slow lens. wat i meant was in comparison with a f2.8 lens.

    i have seen how a Sigma 10-20 perform in a club. (of course with an ext flash)
    the results are amazing!! nice and sharp. colours are great.

    pardon me.. but i think im just one of those a**hole that yearns a f2.8 lens.
    What i need is the skill and vision of a pro... not a pro camera!

  14. #14

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    I'm using tokina 11-16mm... but didnt really using f2.8 much.. its pretty useful in some situation.. but most of the time, I using smaller aperture.

  15. #15

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Am also looking for a WA lens and done some read up. Verdict leans me to Tokina 11-16 due to the 2.8. Maybe will not be using 2.8 much of the time, but I prefer to have it when i need it rather than dont have it when i need it. sure there will be a diff between 2.8 & 4 in low light condition.
    A photo is an art painted by light.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Posts
    14,002

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by fergo View Post
    hahha... dun get me wrong. im not saying f4 is a slow lens. wat i meant was in comparison with a f2.8 lens.

    i have seen how a Sigma 10-20 perform in a club. (of course with an ext flash)
    the results are amazing!! nice and sharp. colours are great.

    pardon me.. but i think im just one of those a**hole that yearns a f2.8 lens.
    Between f/4 and f/2.8 even though only 1 stop away from each other, the f/2.8 is no where much faster too.
    Canon EOS 5D, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.2 L, 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, 600EX-RT. Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bedok
    Posts
    432

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by fergo View Post
    dun quite understand your question bro..

    better in wat sense? price wise varies with brands,quality etc
    What I mean the diff in iq and picture wise between uwa and wa and price gap?

  18. #18

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by VainKid View Post
    What I mean the diff in iq and picture wise between uwa and wa and price gap?
    i aint no pro here... but wat i gathered from the net is that uwa usually have the problem of barrel distortion and pincushion. ('convex' 'concave' effect).
    and some also mention of the softness of the picture at certain ends. (this i not very sure)

    for picture wise, i guess its self explanatory. the wider u go, the more field of view u get. which some photographers use it for some visual effects like 'depth'. also note the view changes when using it on a DX and FX camera.

    read more from here. pretty good. cheers!

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/how-...ide-lenses.htm
    What i need is the skill and vision of a pro... not a pro camera!

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    http://360.itcow.com
    Posts
    2,363

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Quote Originally Posted by gibss View Post
    Well, there's the path not often travelled.

    Zenitar 16mm f2.8
    http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=zenitar+16mm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/zenit/zenitar-16mm.htm
    Don't worry about those QC issues, I got mine a month ago, and it is able to reach infinity focus.
    It's soft at f2.8, but really sharp once you hit f4 onwards.
    Costs $300 flat, got it over eBay.

    Just to give you an idea of how wide 16mm is on a cropped sensor.

    | Changi Beach, f22, 1/60, ISO400 |

    There's the Peleng 8mm too, but be wary of the image quality.

    Happy Researching!,
    gibss
    The Pelang 8mm is roughly the same, when you step all the way to F8 and onwards, it's relatively sharper. Some sellers of the Zenitar 16mm now offers the canon AF electronic too. It's a good buy at around the same price ~$300 SGD.

  20. #20

    Default Re: wide angle lenses

    Another find: Samyang 8mm f3.5 Fisheye. ~$450. It'll blow your mind haha!
    http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=int&...ang+8mm&m=text

    Regards,
    gibss.
    Last edited by gibss; 12th January 2010 at 10:43 AM.
    Nikon & Pentax :)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •