Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 91 of 91

Thread: FF vs Crop body for wedding

  1. #81
    Member 9V-Orion Images's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Autenticate ALGRN @ 7987.8270
    Posts
    1,760

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    Real photographers uses Hasselblad FTW.

    CS Aviation / Flickr
    Per aspera ad astra

  2. #82
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    122

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    Quote Originally Posted by nixontkl View Post
    wonder how that person mentioned by the TS will response to this.

    photographer using the 1D mk3/4, but its a cropped factor. so will that person also say to the person using the 1D mk3/4 "only real photographer use FF" LOL

    but seriously I dont think a photographer at wedding dinner need a shallow DOF capable system. table shots, crowd shots u need more DOF than less. so a FF system maybe good but not a must.
    The question leads to whether the person is questioning the equipments or the photos taken by the equipments.

    Anyway, it is good to keep in mind that a photographer is essentially providing a service to his/her clients. A handsomely sized full frame equipment does make the whole service package more attractive. It's a good way to advertise one's service. For professionals it is not just about the photo taking session, it's a business which also requires packaging/advertising and building of customer base.

    The person may be suggesting that a professional photographer should do something about brandishing his equipments and making a showy business.
    Less is More

  3. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    2,616

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    The Dudes of Hazzard an old TV series
    5D/5D3/Zeiss/28-85/100 F2/200 F4/50 F1.4/70-200/24-85/85 F1.4
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeisser/

  4. #84

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    Damn.. I am a fake..
    When I do right, no one remembers. When I do wrong, no one ever forgets.

  5. #85

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    Quote Originally Posted by GDSNP View Post
    Damn.. I am a fake..
    Don't give up yet. A real photographer has a photo of the moon and a peacock.

    http://photo.net/casual-conversations-forum/00PwWu

  6. #86

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    Quote Originally Posted by fooj View Post
    Hi bros,

    was shooting a wedding sometime back and was approached by someone, this guy saw me using 2 x 40D for wedding shoot and he straight away told me a real photographer never use a crop body for photo shoot.

    Like to hear some view from bros here and i know some of you here are pros, so is it a must to have FF body in order to do wedding shoot?

    regards
    40D for wedding photography? Why not?
    My sister used her 40D for my first day (my wedding was spread over 2 days) and rented a 5DII for 2nd day. Lens was 24-105L for both days.
    Result - relatives in general felt that pictures from 40D look nicer when we showed them the 4R photos. These relatives didn't even know what camera my sis was using for either day.

    So 40D for wedding photography? Why not?

  7. #87

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    The guy who told you that does not think, if i pass a 5dm2 to my 2 yr nephew and snaps and a pns and my nephew snaps which would be better? none its the person that matters ( in this case i'm not talking abt age, pls dunnot mis understood...) FF matters but not always in terms of noise control, but it doesn't compose a photo for u:... Why does NG photographers takes nice shots even in the 90's?? because they're skilled... So bro don't take it to heart for what that guy said...

  8. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Posts
    14,002

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    No lah, a real photographer uses a pin-hole camera!
    Canon EOS 5D, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.2 L, 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, 600EX-RT. Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX.

  9. #89
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    TS has already decided to move on long long time ago liao....... somewhere in page 2, what are you guys dragging on now???

    Quote Originally Posted by fooj View Post
    Well i was using 40D and tokina 12-24mm so i dun need to move back to take group photos. He is a friend of the groom and is the owner of a renown camera shop in kallang... And he was also the driver on that day for the couple. So while we were riding to the next location and he told me i should use FF cameras coz pro photographer never use crop body for wedding. There were also other bad comments he mentioned about Olympus and Sony... dun wish to elaborate those issue. So i just keep quiet and listen lor... At the back of my heart, i ponder could he be right as he is some owner of a camera store...

    Nevertheless, i will maintain what i used, my 40D from now on.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  10. #90

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    ain't it nice to close another thread

  11. #91
    Member fooj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sengkang;Fernvale
    Posts
    1,280

    Default Re: FF vs Crop body for wedding

    thank for all the advices, i m closing this thread now.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •