Thanks for the well versed reply.
I'll heed you to look at the facts again.
Inspired is not a common understanding that it is a copy, atleast to me.
Yes caveat emptor is practiced, but the seller should make reasonable effort to remind that the product is NOT by Gary Fong, and should use a picture of the actual item that is for sale, and not Gary Fong's picture to present his item, it will be misleading and cause misrepresentation.
And the fact that I did not ask for any form of refund, petrol to his place is already $2, to meet at his void deck.
1) He posted this thread first, stating it is OEM and with (puffer) which is a trademark of Gary Fong
2) I'm looking to clarify not to get refund.
3) I gave him the benefit of doubt
If the seller still remains to be hostile with his words, I'll then see what is deem suitable for this case.