![]() |
|
|||||||
| Ready, Lights, Action! Concert, stage performances & events photography. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
I was the official Photographer for the Miss Asian Atlanta 2004 Pageant last week. Took 399 photos of which 310 were keepers. Worked with only the EF 85mm f1.8 prime on a 300D.
Your comments are much valued! I hope to do more stage photography in the future More photos here: http://www.pbase.com/nawoo/miss_asian_atlanta_2004 #1: I predicted for Eleanor to win even before the event started. So just before the final result was announced, i already had my camera fixed and focused on her face just waiting for that winning expression. This is the result. #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 979
|
Nice job Nathan considering u used a 85mm prime to cover the event...
were you one of the official photographers? cos I suspect you need to do a fair bit of moving around since you are using prime. keep up the good work
__________________
www.pbase.com/sebastiansong |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere Out There
Posts: 2,269
|
I like the first one that you posted the best. You got the expression of Eleanor dead on when she won. In addition, I also think that you got a good job with the second shot as well.
Overall, you did real good on your shots. You got excellent expressions on what you have posted. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
Thanks for the comments!
I didn't do a whole lot of moving around at all. 90% of the time, it was at the front of the stage, which explains why the camera angles were always flat straight on 10% of the time, it was at the left side to cover them at the side, which i did not like because it was too angled already. Unless for shots like this where she was facing the left of the stage(she looks like pan Ling ling here right?) The 85mm prime is the ultimate stage photography lense man. it's just the right focal length, that's if you're the official photographer and have front stage access i mean. I got really good shutter speeds like 1/250 to 1/400 wide open. I would like to get my hands on a 135/2 and see how it performs. Last edited by FLiNcHY; 1st February 2004 at 11:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 200
|
You captured some nice expressions. I'll give you credit for that, the eye of an anticipator.
Other than that, the nice colours, the exposure, the sharpness and the beauty of the people were all pre-determined by either the camera or the environment and the subjects. Your framing seems to be in the category of one who shoots regularly for events like these. Coherent and no nosense. best wishes. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
Sweet !
Thanks! Oh well, Although good lenses and good cameras do not a good photographer make, it does help to a certain extent ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
|
flinchy, were all your shots done at f/1.8 or anything lesser?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,737
|
the exposure is spot on man.... the contrast is jsut sweet.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
How freaking sharp is that!!! Hahahah amazing piece of glass man!! I initially had the 70-200 F4L, 18-55mm F3.5-5.6, and 50mm 1.8 in my pockets. But the 85mm just stayed on my 300D the WHOLE night!!! The 70-200 and 18-55 just couldnt take the low light at all! and 50mm was too wide for my liking. The 85mm 1.8 is like the perfect focal length for stage photography. But only if you have like front stage access and all that. I got Shutter speeds of 1/200 to 1/400 all the time depending on what gowns or skin color the contestants were at that time. I think i wanna save up for the 85mm 1.2 already. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
|
point to note: the 85 f/1.2 is known to be extra heavy, and the AF is slower than the "slower" f/1.8 lens, because the focussing group is much heavier, though it's using ring USM...
![]() http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/85mm/index.htm |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
|
Sorry abit of banal talk.
Out of curiosity, what kind of beauty pageant is this? |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
It's a beauty pageant held in Atlanta, Georgia
It's for Asians so anyone who is at least 50% asian can take part Lots of ugly girls take part, don't ask me how they got the ego to join. if you though Miss Singapore was bad, you gotta look at the girls here. Good looks alone will definately get you in the top 10. Because there are less than 10 good looking girls to begin with. Now i wonder what the auditioning stages were like ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 461
|
85mm f/1.8?
Does that means your cropped focal length is actually 85 + 27.0 = 132mm?
__________________
Canon EOS 450D | Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS (Kit) | Minolta X-700 | http://flickr.com/photos/zeus |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
I would think so.
Normally, i don't feel the effect of the added focal length on the telephoto end, but on the wide end. When i used the 18-55mm at 18mm to take the Singapore Cityscape, i found myself asking for more width. But one can never have enough telephoto zoom |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 290
|
Very well focused and exposed shots you have!! But I think u've heard quite abit of that ...
... I'm so envious of your skill, equipment AND opportunity ... |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blk 907 Kopi Tiam Jurong West Ext
Posts: 644
|
Thanks Nathan for sharing. Pics were absolutely fab. Wish I had the chance, the lens and most importantly the skill to shoot like that. Well done ........ tOm
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
Thanks. Yup, the lense definately played a big part. large apertures always help alot.
I think i'm going to sell away all my zooms and switch to all primes in the future. 18-55mm is quite crappy 70-200mm F4L is a Day-only lense. It's hopeless for indoor sports and low light events. Gonna go for the 200m 2.8 if i save up enough. Eleanor Baccay's mom contacted me, wanting to buy prints from me. I don't know how much to charge her since i'm not in it professionally. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North-East
Posts: 269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 621
|
I'm looking for that kinda thing. haha. I can print 4rs at 19 cents and 8rs at $1.96 so i told them i would be charging them $3 per 4r and 10$ per 8r and they were happy about it since i've seen other photographers selling pictures for 10-20 dollars per 4r. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|