Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

  1. #21
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    welcome to the dark side

  2. #22

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    If iso is a concern, check out the new Sony entry level a500 and a550.

    While its true that the a2x0 and a3xp is marginally more noisy than the Canon and nikon at high, the a5x0 is a huge improvement, over taking the Canon and Nikon entry level dslr's noise control.

  3. #23

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by Cartman2000 View Post
    They're going to have to improve on their image processors first
    a550's noise is better than your 50d. lol

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    River Valley
    Posts
    1,046

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    i am not considering sony as i wanted video in my Dslr (or any still camera that i maybe using) as i hv habit of combining video + photos in my final family video presentation

    but no doubt sony is also a good brand.. i go now see sample shot of A5xx and see see

  5. #25
    Deregistered shaoken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Clementi/West Coast
    Posts
    2,115

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Every brand have it's own pros and cons.
    There is no brand with "perfect" functions and specs.
    Last edited by shaoken; 9th November 2009 at 09:05 PM.

  6. #26
    Member XkaOnslaught's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    322

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by shaoken View Post
    Every brand have it's own pros and cons.
    There is no brand with "perfect" functions and specs.
    1


    hehehehe
    A850 | Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 HSM | Sigma 50mm F1.4 HSM | Tamron SP AF 90 F2.8 Di | Sony 70-200G

  7. #27
    Moderator daredevil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    lil red dot
    Posts
    21,627
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by XkaOnslaught View Post
    1


    hehehehe
    Red One... made in singapore too.... That thing is a beast! Nicee....

  8. #28

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    enjoy your time debating about your equipment...
    i'm going out to shoot..

  9. #29

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by ortega View Post
    just to set the record straight, canon also cannot use lenses without motor
    Nikon follow canon you know, cost cutting measures
    It's not correct and it's not funny.

  10. #30

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by archlover View Post
    enjoy your time debating about your equipment...
    i'm going out to shoot..
    Fully agreed with you

  11. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    River Valley
    Posts
    1,046

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by archlover View Post
    enjoy your time debating about your equipment...
    i'm going out to shoot..
    I will too, when I decide what to buy ... this debate is not to find out who wins all, its for helping me to decide the right one, i ain't high income earner so i need to be more careful

  12. #32

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Considered the recently launched Pentax K-x? Seems to be giving very good high ISO shots according to various reviews and user reports. And it has video. You might want to pop over to the Pentax discussion area for a look.

  13. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    River Valley
    Posts
    1,046

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by watchthewaves View Post
    Considered the recently launched Pentax K-x? Seems to be giving very good high ISO shots according to various reviews and user reports. And it has video. You might want to pop over to the Pentax discussion area for a look.
    i did.. but the lens selection bit not to what i like... where's the 18-200mm with VR/IS ? and 35mm f2 also ?

  14. #34

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by TsQ View Post
    i did.. but the lens selection bit not to what i like... where's the 18-200mm with VR/IS ? and 35mm f2 also ?
    i think Pentax DSLR, like Sony's DSLR, has build in image stabalizer (correct me if im wrong). Thus these DSLRs don need IS in their lens. Any lens that they use automatically becomes an IS lens.

    This is a good thing for Sony and Pentax camps, we never had to worry about paying more for IS in the lens.

    And before you say "but having stabalizer build into lens sure better than in body what", take a look at this video and determind for yourself.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPdy52mR6Io

    a comparison of having stabalizer in lens vs having in body, including a final test of having BOTH stabalizer in body and lens on at the same time.

    BTW the test was conducted using the olympus E510, so its not a gauge of the pentax and sony DSLRs. Considering that pentax k-x and sony a5x0 came out much later than the E510, there is a possibility that the IS of these newer cameras are better than the E510.
    Last edited by android17; 10th November 2009 at 01:40 AM.

  15. #35
    Senior Member ZerocoolAstra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    rainy Singapore
    Posts
    9,522

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    this is a total WTT

    (waste-time thread)

    because it has descended into yet another brand war...
    sigh...

    Photography is about creating works of art through your skills with your equipment and your creativity... It's an art form, not a "mine is better than yours" competition. Too many gearheads...

    I wonder if Renoir ever compared the quality of his canvas, brushes and oils with Monet, for example
    Exploring! :)

  16. #36
    Moderator daredevil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    lil red dot
    Posts
    21,627
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by ZerocoolAstra View Post
    this is a total WTT

    (waste-time thread)

    because it has descended into yet another brand war...
    sigh...

    Photography is about creating works of art through your skills with your equipment and your creativity... It's an art form, not a "mine is better than yours" competition. Too many gearheads...

    I wonder if Renoir ever compared the quality of his canvas, brushes and oils with Monet, for example


    hear hear hear!

    No skill, with the best camera, pictures also look like dung.

    Sad.. nowadays expensive camera becoming much like an LV bag. For show only. You carry Pentax or Olympus people laugh at you, say what kind of brand are those and picture can make it or not. LOL.
    Last edited by daredevil123; 10th November 2009 at 07:49 AM.

  17. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    River Valley
    Posts
    1,046

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by ZerocoolAstra View Post
    this is a total WTT

    (waste-time thread)

    because it has descended into yet another brand war...
    sigh...

    Photography is about creating works of art through your skills with your equipment and your creativity... It's an art form, not a "mine is better than yours" competition. Too many gearheads...

    I wonder if Renoir ever compared the quality of his canvas, brushes and oils with Monet, for example
    actually i just wanted ppl to varify what i see is what i think i saw... nothing of canon vs nikon.. its just one sample photo of one model from each manufacturer.

    that's it.

    anyway my doubt is clearified. thks guys.

  18. #38
    Member hotwork77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    119'37.70"N 10347'39.19"E
    Posts
    1,353

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    Quote Originally Posted by TsQ View Post
    actually i just wanted ppl to varify what i see is what i think i saw... nothing of canon vs nikon.. its just one sample photo of one model from each manufacturer.

    that's it.

    anyway my doubt is clearified. thks guys.

    You saw correctly. However, I must add that the image quality also has to do with the type of lens you use. Some may give you a soft wash out look but some are crystal sharp even on the same camera.
    Dreamz is the Alternate Realty | Stand Up and Be Counted

  19. #39
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: am i seeing it right? Nikon hv better high ISO then canon...

    actually the technology always changes and the camera brands always leap frog each other
    so stick with the brand that you feel comfortable with

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •