Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 40

Thread: Sigma 12-24 indepth review..

  1. #1

    Default Sigma 12-24 indepth review..

    Reviewed by a canon user on both digital n slides!!
    SWEET~~

    Click here!!!

  2. #2
    Member ransoma22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    KTV Lounge Hall
    Posts
    1,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hackie
    Reviewed by a canon user on both digital n slides!!
    SWEET~~

    Click here!!!
    The link is dead,
    Try this
    http://194.100.88.243/petteri/pont/R..._f4.5-5.6.html

  3. #3

    Default

    any price and availibility in SIN ?
    Sven

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Singapore / Japan / China
    Posts
    1,928

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oeyvind
    Looks good.
    then buy

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by P24
    any price and availibility in SIN ?
    Sven
    Last month I was quoted $1250 at a shop.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rncw
    then buy
    very funny... no $$$ leh. Can print some for me?

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ransoma22
    oops~~ thanks~~~~
    enjoying ur new toy? :P

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by P24
    any price and availibility in SIN ?
    Sven
    john 316 qouted me abt $1150.. but no stock for nikon mount yet~~~

    think konota also has.. abt tat price too! BUY BUY BUY!!!!

  10. #10
    Senior Member Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Upper Bukit Timah
    Posts
    11,668

    Default

    I went to AP a few weeks before CNY, they have the Nikon mount ones. Quoted $1200+. Couldn't find any Canon mount ones though.

  11. #11
    Member ransoma22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    KTV Lounge Hall
    Posts
    1,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hackie
    oops~~ thanks~~~~
    enjoying ur new toy? :P
    You welcome.
    Yeah. My precious...

  12. #12

    Default

    Hmmm. And I thought I had completed my lens collection.

  13. #13

    Default

    woooooooo looks goooooooooooood

  14. #14

    Default

    Tested this lens with a Nikon 18-35mm F3.5-4.5 and the Tamron 17-35mm F2.8-4.

    The Sigma fared the worst in terms of sharpness and color. Soft wide open, and not really sharp at F8 too. Perhaps the set I tested was a lemon, but it was the case then. Cosmetics and styling looks quite ugly too. Heavy and chunky like most Sigma's.

    Being a G lens too, it certainly restricts the user to the newer bodies only.

    Good point is that the distortion at 12mm is quite well controlled. Similar to the other two lenses tested.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by finkster
    Tested this lens with a Nikon 18-35mm F3.5-4.5 and the Tamron 17-35mm F2.8-4.

    The Sigma fared the worst in terms of sharpness and color. Soft wide open, and not really sharp at F8 too. Perhaps the set I tested was a lemon, but it was the case then. Cosmetics and styling looks quite ugly too. Heavy and chunky like most Sigma's.

    Being a G lens too, it certainly restricts the user to the newer bodies only.

    Good point is that the distortion at 12mm is quite well controlled. Similar to the other two lenses tested.


    have you checked out the link? the guy who tested the lens appears to be some pro....... You should check out his tutorialz.......

    Anyway he mentioned a few times that its in his opinion.


  16. #16

    Default

    From the samples on the net, the distortion seems very well controlled for a 12mm. How does it perform(barrel distortion) compared to the Nikon and Tamron at 20mm?

  17. #17

    Default

    Nope, didn't read it yet becos I didn't want it to influence what I felt. Will be going to check it out now.

    I tested all three lenses at their widest focal length at both wide-open apertures and at F8, and their narrowest focal length, again wide-open and at F8.

    Didn't check ranges in-between or at other apertures as it would have taken more time. Just did a quick 10min test to see how they performed against each other.

  18. #18

    Default

    I see, coz I like everything about the Tamron except for the noticeable barrel distortion at 17-20mm.

    If the sigma has such good distortion characteristics, then it might be worth checking out, even if I have to stick to f11 all the time.

  19. #19

    Default

    Yup. The Sigma does have very low barrel distortion. The Tamron and Nikon does have BD, but in most situations, should still be acceptable to most users, unless there's a demand for absolutely straight edges.

    The Sigma is not a low-light lens though. Indoor wedding shoots and dark ballrooms would be pushing it a fair bit.

  20. #20

    Default

    Agree, but I've been spoiled by my 20mm prime and I can't stand seeing distortion when I look in the viewfinder. I would have bought the tamron at PIA if not for that niggling point. Now I feel like waiting for Sigma's new 17-35 or before I decide on it or the Sigma/Nikon 12-24mm instead.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •