ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 24th January 2004   #1
st11x
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra,Australia
Posts: 57
Default Replacing the front element

Hi,

I have a lens that has a very faint scratch on the glass. So far, it hasn't cause me any concerns, and most of the time when I hold the lens up, I can't really see the fault.

However, I would like to ask if I can get the front element replaced? The lens is a minolta and I tried to send a query via their website but the form goes dead when I press on the submit button. If you don't key in anything at all, the form woirks fine (makes you wonder what message are they sending).
I'm currently in Australia. I had worse experiences with Minolta Singapore (and their parent), so I'm not really surprised.

If it can be done, what kind of money am I looking to pay?

Thanks
Matt
st11x is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #2
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

guess you can only contact Minolta and their subsidaries to see what they can do for you. i've only heard of another user replacing a front element, but that was a canon.
sehsuan is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #3
mylau
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,801
Default

Originally Posted by st11x
Hi,

I have a lens that has a very faint scratch on the glass. So far, it hasn't cause me any concerns, and most of the time when I hold the lens up, I can't really see the fault.

However, I would like to ask if I can get the front element replaced? The lens is a minolta and I tried to send a query via their website but the form goes dead when I press on the submit button. If you don't key in anything at all, the form woirks fine (makes you wonder what message are they sending).
I'm currently in Australia. I had worse experiences with Minolta Singapore (and their parent), so I'm not really surprised.

If it can be done, what kind of money am I looking to pay?

Thanks
Matt
i've paid $400 to replace a front element before.
mylau is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 24th January 2004   #4
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

$400 on what lens, mylau?
sehsuan is offline  
Old 25th January 2004   #5
st11x
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra,Australia
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by mylau
i've paid $400 to replace a front element before.
Wow! That's too steep for the lens I bought. I paid about SGD $ 650 for the lens when it was new. Maybe they have different prices for lens of different grade. As with anything Australian prices, it'll probably be double that

Minolta have like a main distributor here. It's hagemayer.com.au. Tried their website to send an equiry, but the same thing happens to their form. Bad luck.

I'll probably have to ring them up on the next business day.

Matt
st11x is offline  
Old 25th January 2004   #6
SNAG
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,410
Default

Hi there, st11x!

Just to ask, is the front element causing any image degradation on your pictures? If not, I suggest that you don't change the front element. From what I assume (and I may be jolly well wrong), replacing the front element is not going to be cheap, and if it ain't broke, why fix it?

If it really turns out to be more than $200, I suggest that you spend the money elsewhere.

And to prevent such incidents from happening, put a protective filter on everytime you shoot..

Just my 2 cents worth!
SNAG is offline  
Old 25th January 2004   #7
st11x
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra,Australia
Posts: 57
Default

The lens still work beautifully at the moment. I just thought if things get worse, I might want to send it in for a replacement.

Now that I know the average price of doing it, the money is probably better spent on a new lens in my case

I used to have the UV filter on my old lenses but I have stopped using them.

Thanks
Matt
st11x is offline  
Old 25th January 2004   #8
ST1100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
Default

If you can barely see the scratch, it shouldn't affect the image. Shine a torch at it and notice what angles the line is most visible. Those are the angles where stray light hitting the front element will degrade the picture the most. Keep the hood on.
ST1100 is offline  
Old 25th January 2004   #9
Kit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,010
Default

I used to shoot with a 70-200 f/2.8 that had a cracked front element with a small portion chipped off. My pics turned out alright. Guess I was lucky.
Kit is offline  
Old 28th January 2004   #10
smallaperture
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Catchment Area
Posts: 2,423
Default

Originally Posted by st11x
The lens still work beautifully at the moment. I just thought if things get worse, I might want to send it in for a replacement.

Now that I know the average price of doing it, the money is probably better spent on a new lens in my case

I used to have the UV filter on my old lenses but I have stopped using them.

Thanks
Matt
You say you stopped using filter to protect your lens. I wonder why. Is it that you're more daring now, living more dangerously or something.

With my small digicam, I am always worried that I scratch or chip the front element of the lens. With SLR lenses, there is no worries for me, as I always have the filter for protection. It's like buying insurance, no worries.

Filter degrading your pix? Never, just do an A/B comparison. Even single coated filter will do. HMC, the standard for multi-coated ones are better.
smallaperture is offline  
Old 28th January 2004   #11
sriram
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,274
Default

One of my very best lens has a scratch on the front element. However the scratch is not huge and the image quality is still superb. Unless your scratch is like a crater, I'd suggest just using the lens and don't worry about it. I've used a friend's Kiev medium format kit with scratches and dings on the lens but the image quality is still superb... I only faced a problem when shooting directly at the sun when it tends to flare a bit more.
sriram is offline  
Old 29th January 2004   #12
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

For your info...
Canon S'pore quoted me $340 to change the front element of a 70-200 F2.8.
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Old 30th January 2004   #13
HelmetBox
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
Default

I read on the net sometime ago that some guy actually took the glass out then went to some spectacle shop and asked them to duplicate the exact lens with the same dimensions and index....... Don't know how true is it?
HelmetBox is offline  
Old 30th January 2004   #14
st11x
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra,Australia
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by smallaperture
You say you stopped using filter to protect your lens. I wonder why. Is it that you're more daring now, living more dangerously or something.
Don't really know why I started off this lens without it. I probably thought the lens designer would have invented a detachable "pre-front" element if it didn't had any adverse effects on a lens. Maybe they were after more business coz you will definitely scratch it

Well, I'm regreting that now.

Matt
st11x is offline  
Old 30th January 2004   #15
st11x
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra,Australia
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by HelmetBox
I read on the net sometime ago that some guy actually took the glass out then went to some spectacle shop and asked them to duplicate the exact lens with the same dimensions and index....... Don't know how true is it?

That's interesting. The spectable stores do carry lens made from Nikon. Hmm, if it is good for you eyes, it must be good for the camera

He took the glass out from his lens?
st11x is offline  
Old 30th January 2004   #16
HelmetBox
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
Default

Originally Posted by st11x
That's interesting. The spectable stores do carry lens made from Nikon. Hmm, if it is good for you eyes, it must be good for the camera

He took the glass out from his lens?
From the write up, he mentioned that he removed the front element then went down to get a 'duplicate' as its basically just 'a piece of lens'. I'll do a search on the net again and if I find the article I'll post the link

HelmetBox is offline  
Old 1st February 2004   #17
smallaperture
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Catchment Area
Posts: 2,423
Default

The replaceable front element is simple the protective UV/skylight filter. Simple, isn't it. If you ever scratch or crack it, no problem, just replace it. I always have a spare filter to replace just in case I crack the one I have on the lens.

In fact, during the excitement of shooting, and moving on, I forget to replace the lens cap, and put cam and lens into the bag. This happens quite often to me. So far, the filter gets dirty only, and no scratch. The filter is the fall guy, the insurance.
smallaperture is offline  
Old 1st February 2004   #18
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

Originally Posted by smallaperture
The replaceable front element is simple the protective UV/skylight filter. Simple, isn't it. If you ever scratch or crack it, no problem, just replace it. I always have a spare filter to replace just in case I crack the one I have on the lens.

In fact, during the excitement of shooting, and moving on, I forget to replace the lens cap, and put cam and lens into the bag. This happens quite often to me. So far, the filter gets dirty only, and no scratch. The filter is the fall guy, the insurance.

Isn't the front element an integral part of the lens? If u read lens specs it always says how many elements in how many groups.... The skylight/UV filter is just the filter and that's not part of the lens. It's an external piece of glass screwed onto the lens thread.
TME is offline  
Old 1st February 2004   #19
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default

Originally Posted by st11x
Hi,

I have a lens that has a very faint scratch on the glass. So far, it hasn't cause me any concerns, and most of the time when I hold the lens up, I can't really see the fault.

However, I would like to ask if I can get the front element replaced? The lens is a minolta and I tried to send a query via their website but the form goes dead when I press on the submit button. If you don't key in anything at all, the form woirks fine (makes you wonder what message are they sending).
I'm currently in Australia. I had worse experiences with Minolta Singapore (and their parent), so I'm not really surprised.

If it can be done, what kind of money am I looking to pay?

Thanks
Matt

Is it possible to do a DIY polish or get some camera workshop to do a little polishing for u. I know those polishing creams or something like that that can remove very fine scratches? Might beat changing the front element.
TME is offline  
Old 1st February 2004   #20
oeyvind
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,556
Default

Originally Posted by TME
Is it possible to do a DIY polish or get some camera workshop to do a little polishing for u. I know those polishing creams or something like that that can remove very fine scratches? Might beat changing the front element.
by doing that you are also removing whatever coating on it as well.
__________________
flickr
oeyvind is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.14415 seconds with 7 queries