![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 203
|
Hi all,
I'm using a 100% manual camera. I have a flash of GN24, it has fixed flash output too. There is a exposure table telling me what aperture to use when using ISO, say 100, when my subject is, is 2m away. Frenz told me that i can actually calculate the aperture by using formula below: GN/Distance from subject= aperture would anyone like to comment on either methods. Can anyone teach me a better way of setting the correct aperture. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 203
|
errr... come on leh, give some comments, so many ppl viewed but no one wanna give me so advice, pls give me some ideas leh
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
|
Maybe coz the way u described is the best way already?
at ISO100, GN/dist from subject = aperature. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
both are the same. also, for every doubling of ISO, multiply the guide number by 1.4x if you are manually calculating.
Last edited by mpenza; 24th January 2004 at 12:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
|
you already have the answer with the formula
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
|
unless u talking about aperature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
|
Any webby to refer to? Coz I always tot is x2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
|
also, check whether the GN is described in feet or meters...yours i think should be in meters. then your dist to subject should be in meters. check at what focal length your GN is rated at. a wider focal length than the rated focal length used will imply a smaller GN and coversely a longer focal length (than the rated focal length) used implies a larger GN available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
|
i think mpenza may be rite abt the doubling of iso with GN X 1.4.....go check on the web.......
go read abt the inverse square law too....i.e. every doubling of subject distance reduces the rated flash output to 1/4 its power.... |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
|
aperature x1.4, so the LHS of the eqn also x1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
yup, doubly sure. you could also check the maunal of your flash and do the calculations if it's not explicitly stated.
here's one article: http://www.jafaphotography.com/flashex.htm GN of the new film= GN of known film x the square root of the known ISO/new ISO. (A bit slow cos was searching for articles) Last edited by mpenza; 24th January 2004 at 12:31 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|