ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd January 2004   #1
laughingstation
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 203
Default Flash exposure

Hi all,
I'm using a 100% manual camera. I have a flash of GN24, it has fixed flash output too. There is a exposure table telling me what aperture to use when using ISO, say 100, when my subject is, is 2m away.
Frenz told me that i can actually calculate the aperture by using formula below:
GN/Distance from subject= aperture

would anyone like to comment on either methods.
Can anyone teach me a better way of setting the correct aperture.
laughingstation is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #2
laughingstation
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 203
Default

errr... come on leh, give some comments, so many ppl viewed but no one wanna give me so advice, pls give me some ideas leh
laughingstation is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #3
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

Maybe coz the way u described is the best way already?
at ISO100, GN/dist from subject = aperature.
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 24th January 2004   #4
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

both are the same. also, for every doubling of ISO, multiply the guide number by 1.4x if you are manually calculating.

Last edited by mpenza; 24th January 2004 at 12:03 PM.
mpenza is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #5
GitS
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
Default

you already have the answer with the formula
GitS is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #6
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

Originally Posted by mpenza
both are the same. also, for every doubling of ISO, multiply the gain number by 1.4x.
U sure 1.4x ?
unless u talking about aperature.
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #7
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
U sure 1.4x ?
unless u talking about aperature.
yup, I'm sure. not talking about aperture, but the GN.
mpenza is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #8
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

Originally Posted by mpenza
yup, I'm sure. not talking about aperture, but the GN.
u double sure?
Any webby to refer to?
Coz I always tot is x2.
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #9
GitS
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
Maybe coz the way u described is the best way already?
at ISO100, GN/dist from subject = aperature.
take note, the GN is extended when your iso is increased, i think its doubled with evey stop increase in iso.

also, check whether the GN is described in feet or meters...yours i think should be in meters. then your dist to subject should be in meters.

check at what focal length your GN is rated at. a wider focal length than the rated focal length used will imply a smaller GN and coversely a longer focal length (than the rated focal length) used implies a larger GN available.
GitS is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #10
GitS
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
Default

i think mpenza may be rite abt the doubling of iso with GN X 1.4.....go check on the web.......

go read abt the inverse square law too....i.e. every doubling of subject distance reduces the rated flash output to 1/4 its power....
GitS is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #11
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

Originally Posted by mpenza
both are the same. also, for every doubling of ISO, multiply the guide number by 1.4x if you are manually calculating.
Ok ok... got it liao...
aperature x1.4, so the LHS of the eqn also x1.4
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Old 24th January 2004   #12
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

yup, doubly sure. you could also check the maunal of your flash and do the calculations if it's not explicitly stated.

here's one article:
http://www.jafaphotography.com/flashex.htm

GN of the new film= GN of known film x the square root of the known ISO/new ISO.

(A bit slow cos was searching for articles)

Last edited by mpenza; 24th January 2004 at 12:31 PM.
mpenza is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08692 seconds with 7 queries