PP has always been done .. in film and nw digital. Nowaday photo competiton allows some degree of PP.
It is here to stay.
I think touching up the image is alright but superimprose with another face is too much!
Look at the skin tone. That is some degree of artificial skin tone... making it so 'plastic' and 'fake', I don't see this work in a fashion magazine, maybe for a game review magazine. I think i saw a similar work in NFS game cover few years ago.
Last edited by iNotion; 29th October 2009 at 08:37 AM.
i thought this is a photography forum??
Last edited by welspain; 29th October 2009 at 09:08 AM.
If you are a paid professional, PP till your client happy.
If you are hobbyist, PP till yourself happy.
well post processing is just to bring out the best between the photo and ur creativity. PP is different from photoshopping.
PP probably change the mood and colors of the photos but photoshop is really changing the whole concept and deisgn. Do i make sense?
Craptacular! More Craptacular : D80 + MB-D80 + 18mm - 135mm + 50mm F1.4
if one does PP to change the whole concept and design, then the photo would've been a failure right, since the intent of the photo is lost.
Is PP really needed?
No, it is not really needed
you do not need to do PP
but it would be better if it was done