![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
Hi guys! Seems that a lot of you guys are using Olympus camera, why not start a thread dedicated to olympus talk =P.
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hougang, SG
Posts: 1,490
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tiong Bahru
Posts: 40
|
I'll like to join in too...but probably may not be able to contribute as much as you guys cos' I am really new in photography.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 45
|
hi,
im in also! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AMK
Posts: 133
|
hi guys ...how much is the lens for 3040 zoom....any body knows.....thinking of getting one cos zoom on my present digi not enough?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hougang, SG
Posts: 1,490
|
Olympus B-300 1.7x HQ TC --> $280 Olympus C-210 1.9x HQ TC --> $70 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tiong Bahru
Posts: 40
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hougang, SG
Posts: 1,490
|
Whereas the C-210, although got higher magnification, is smaller in size and has some pretty bad vignetting problem except at max zoom. It's not that the C-210 is no good, just that the B-300 is much better. Quality difference lah! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
The C-210 is meant more for a smaller lens while the B-300 is larger and will work better with more cameras.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AMK
Posts: 133
|
where to get the B300?
thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hougang, SG
Posts: 1,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
any idea if my C700uz can use C210 ?
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
Heard that the C-180 (1.7x) works better and costs the same as a C-210. you might want to try it. using a smaller aperture (larger #) would probably reduce vignetting as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,090
|
the c210 and c180 doesn't work on the c700uz at all range without vignetting.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 951
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 951
|
Hi guys,
I am torn between 2 choices. Have talked to some Gurus and they have given very good advises but still can't decide. I want to get a lens adaptor and UV filter. Later I may want to use TC or WC lens. IF I use CLA-1 lens tube and step up to 52mm then I can use the C210 or C180 later. But, it will give me flash shadowing and bla bla flash problem. If I take lens tube that step down to 37mm then no flash problem but 37mm TC may give me Vignetting problem and can't use C-210 and C-180 anymore. What do you guys think? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
Anyone here interested to go to city and take night shots with your camera on Saturday 26th/Jan ? Please sms me at 94784518. Will meet @ city area ard 5pm. Anyone?
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|