Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Gimbal heads

  1. #1

    Default Gimbal heads

    Hi,
    Anybody has any tried the different brands of gimbal heads? Any feedback between these 3 brands?

    - Benro
    - Jobu
    - Wimberly

    - Luenny
    - Luenny

  2. #2

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Wimberly seems to be the best option out of the 3. Never heard of "Jobu" but Benro heads are pretty good although they really are not in the same league as the premium brands.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Land of the Teddy Bear
    Posts
    2,324

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Tried my friend Jobu Gimbal, seems good and very smooth, but not sure it can take those heavy weight lens. I have compare benro full gimbal and wimberley full gimbal at Orient photo, despite of $500 difference, i chose the more expensive wimberley full gimbal because the built is there.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Any idea which store sells Jobu gimbal heads?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Land of the Teddy Bear
    Posts
    2,324

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Quote Originally Posted by PrimePhotog View Post
    Any idea which store sells Jobu gimbal heads?
    They bought it from overseas.... don't think it is on sales locally

  6. #6

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Manfrotto has an attractive option.

  7. #7
    Senior Member GENO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Teddy Bear Land
    Posts
    2,981

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Quote Originally Posted by Dream Merchant View Post
    Manfrotto has an attractive option.
    u mean meant for drop?
    Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil:

  8. #8

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Quote Originally Posted by GENO View Post
    u mean meant for drop?
    What do u mean drop bro? Pls advise as I'm looking into tat brand. Thanks.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Manfrotto has an attractive option.
    I don't like Manfrotto's design as it didn't feel very stable compared to the Wimberly sidekick. And it doesn't seem very compact.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    1.45N 103.83E
    Posts
    3,202

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    If you are serious, skip all the other brands and go for Wimberly.

    The Manfrotto 393 is bulky and not that smooth. Tighten too tight you cant get fast reacttion, tighten too loose your lens will tilt. Wimbrely Gimbal will maintain in position and also smooth enough to move about. Benro may look the same but I have my reservation on the reliability. Benro does not feel as smooth as Benro.


    BTW, getting a sidekick + a good ballhead is more expensive than a full Gimbal so just skip the side kick too. And its also not as stable.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    It depends. If you don't already have a ballhead then a ballhead + sidekick will be cheaper than a ballhead + full gimbal head.

    That said I'm not altogether convinced about sidekicks; I think you can certainly get by with a good ballhead and a 300/2.8, and I'm not sure I'd want to use anything longer/heavier on a sidekick style head anyway.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
    Posts
    12,716

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Benro and Jobu are just "copies" of the original Wimberly. As much as they look alike and identical, the worksmanship and material used are miles apart.

    Wimberly definitely has better finish, the head feels more weighty and is solid built. But the same cannot be said for Benro, I have not tried Jobu, but it should not be far away.

    Cheaper as they are, they are copies. So it's still basically what you pay is what you get.

    If one is just using the head not frequently, or using on a lesser lense (300mm-ish? ), probably Benro or Jobu will suffice. But if one is using the heavier and pricey lense, I reckon Wimberly would be a much better choice.

  13. #13
    Moderator chngpe01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    9,863
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Bought a Jobu before and sold it within a day after it arrives (at a losss) and go back to my old whimberely. That much said about other gimbal head.

    For a whimberely you need not even need to exert any force to tighten it and it will stay in position firmly (talking about a 500mmf4 lens). As for the manfrotto (which I gave away), the Jobu (sold immediately - to me it was a con job at that price) and the "thai copy" of the whimberely - they all need force to tighten it and it still have some slippages, - for long lens a slight slippage is magnified when you look thru it.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Gimbal heads

    Thanks for the replies. Sigh!! Looks like still have to spend the money. By the way, my lens is one of those heavy weights of Nikon. Old version of 400mm f2.8. It's even heavier than the new 600mm f4 lens.
    - Luenny

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •