![]() |
|
|||||||
| Underwater Photography All things nautically & photographically related. Dive in!! |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 551
|
Taken last Sept in Bali, Nusa Penida area. This baby nurse shark was squeezed under a shelf of rock and staghorn coral, so I just stuck my camera underneath and shot away without being able to aim properly. Haha - the advantage of NOT having a strobe is that your housing can squeeze into small spaces!!
Comments and criticism most welcomed! Shot with Canon A70, no external strobes. Cokin 81C filter. Very minimal post-processing. Last edited by kng; 9th January 2004 at 12:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
Nice..
well taken my friend. Thanks for sharing. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
|
baby?? wa the photo looks like there is nothing above its head... ^_^ and minimal processing!! hoho.. not displaying kng's prowess here then
how big is the baby? |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 551
|
Questions for the experts (you know who you all are ):-1. how to prevent the blown-out highlights, esp when shooting around sandy patches or shooting upwards with sunrays filtering down? (Pls dun tell me to buy a 10D )2. some fishes have red-eye or yellow-eye or white-eye etc due to the flash. Is it possible to prevent this? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
|
oh ya! the sand thing is also something that always bothers me...
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
If you want to prevent bown out highlights on sandy patches, i normally switch to Spot metering, if you have TTL it should work.... technically. Last time with the F90X, i used Spot metering, exposure minus 1 stop. Strobes pointing inwards towards the subject. FYI i have not had the luxury of having a strobe yet for my 5050.. so not qualified to comment on that Last edited by waisj; 9th January 2004 at 12:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
|
sorry... TTL? no strobe?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East, Singapore
Posts: 4,213
|
hmm.. can only bring to f8.0 lo... sad.... my setting is usually at least f6.3
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
Sorry my humble apologies,
i used the aperture of F8.0 on C5050Z also was in Smacro mode, used 7 flash intensity. In macro, F7.0 with flash intensity dialled down to -0.7 The later is in Spot Metering |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 551
|
One problem was that the shark was in the shadow of the rock/coral so if i used a lower flash setting, the shark will prob be underexposed. Perhaps another way is to frame it better to eliminate some of the bright sand in the background. Beivied, the baby shark was around 3 feet long?? Hard to tell cos it was squeezed under the rock & corals. I do hope that this and the scorpion fish photo will show cs-ers that even without strobes and a humble camera, you can take acceptable shots of (non-macro) small-medium underwater creatures. Dive and practice more! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OZilla
Posts: 1,965
|
) |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|