ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 1st January 2004   #1
cphile
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
Talking Another noobie question

Hi,

On the 35mm format, which focal length is taken as Life-Sized pictures. (ie. size on photo reflects size in real life)?

I read somewhere that it's 80mm but others say that it's 50mm?

Or are they both wrong?

Is there any commonly used or popular focals lengths for capturing street shooting, still life?



Many thanks in advance
cphile is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #2
yaoxing
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bedok, Singapore
Posts: 773
Default

A 1.70-metre tall man can always be squeezed into a 35mm frame, so how can that ever reflect life-size? Are you referring to the focal length to achieve a "standard ratio" (if there exist) between object size and image size?

Experts feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I'm also interested to know the answer.
yaoxing is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #3
tomcat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,462
Default

Non-expert here... but only 1:1 reproduction Macro lenses can produce images where the objects are the same in absolute size as their real-life counterparts. And these lenses can come in different focal lengths eg. 50mm, 90mm, 100mm, 105mm 180mm, etc.
But I don't think that's what cphile actually mean to ask, right?
tomcat is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 1st January 2004   #4
cphile
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
Default

hmm....

I dunno leh...

-__-?
cphile is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #5
cphile
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
Default

ummm....

I think I was asking about how those people shoot those ads in newpapers that reflect the advertised object as "Actual size shown"

Erm... or is it just a matter of how u control the enlargement process to the final print size?

I hate being a n00bie >_<!!

Last edited by cphile; 1st January 2004 at 02:16 PM.
cphile is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #6
tomcat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,462
Default

Originally Posted by cphile
ummm....

I think I was asking about how those people shoot those ads in newpapers that reflect the advertised object as "Actual size shown"

Erm... or is it just a matter of how u control the enlargement process to the final print size?

I hate being a n00bie >_<!!
That's just through enlargement of the final print until the object in the image is the same size as the real-life object itself.
tomcat is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #7
yahoosg
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North
Posts: 108
Default

at 50mm focal length, the angle that you see in the viewfinder is equivalent to what the human eye can see.

when it is lower than 50mm, let says 28mm, it is considered a wide angle because you can see more things in the viewfinder since it cover a greater angle. the human eye cant see that kind of extreme wide angle.

hence, focal length has nothing to do with giving a "real size" pix. hope i am making sense. hee..
yahoosg is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #8
Gui
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by cphile
Hi,

On the 35mm format, which focal length is taken as Life-Sized pictures. (ie. size on photo reflects size in real life)?
3x zoom is around the actual size u see in real life thru the viewfinder.
Gui is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #9
ckiang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
Default

Originally Posted by Gui
3x zoom is around the actual size u see in real life thru the viewfinder.
"3x zoom" is never an accurate representation. It all depends on what "1x" is. A Sigma 300-800 is a 2.6x zoom, but I am sure you're not going to get actual size pics.

Regards
CK
ckiang is offline  
Old 1st January 2004   #10
justarius
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western side of Singapore
Posts: 1,163
Default

I'm no micro expert but I think lifesize reproduction is not a function of focal length but rather that of a lens itself. There are lens which can get you 1:1 or bigger reproduction on the film, i.e. the object is the same size on the negative as it is in real life. To get lifesize prints however, I agree with tomcat that it's just a question of enlarging the print until you get the size you want.
justarius is offline  
Old 2nd January 2004   #11
cphile
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
Talking Thanks thanks all

Thanks all for the replies...

I guess it's a mix up between life-sized printouts vs. "real-life" viewing angle of the human eye.

But I get the general idea... ^_^
cphile is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.09479 seconds with 7 queries