![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
|
Hi,
On the 35mm format, which focal length is taken as Life-Sized pictures. (ie. size on photo reflects size in real life)? I read somewhere that it's 80mm but others say that it's 50mm? Or are they both wrong? Is there any commonly used or popular focals lengths for capturing street shooting, still life? Many thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bedok, Singapore
Posts: 773
|
A 1.70-metre tall man can always be squeezed into a 35mm frame, so how can that ever reflect life-size? Are you referring to the focal length to achieve a "standard ratio" (if there exist) between object size and image size?
Experts feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I'm also interested to know the answer. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,462
|
Non-expert here... but only 1:1 reproduction Macro lenses can produce images where the objects are the same in absolute size as their real-life counterparts. And these lenses can come in different focal lengths eg. 50mm, 90mm, 100mm, 105mm 180mm, etc.
But I don't think that's what cphile actually mean to ask, right?
__________________
Fish Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/oddballs IR Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/infra_red |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
|
hmm....
I dunno leh... -__-? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
|
ummm....
I think I was asking about how those people shoot those ads in newpapers that reflect the advertised object as "Actual size shown" Erm... or is it just a matter of how u control the enlargement process to the final print size? I hate being a n00bie >_<!! Last edited by cphile; 1st January 2004 at 02:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,462
|
__________________
Fish Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/oddballs IR Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/infra_red |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North
Posts: 108
|
at 50mm focal length, the angle that you see in the viewfinder is equivalent to what the human eye can see.
when it is lower than 50mm, let says 28mm, it is considered a wide angle because you can see more things in the viewfinder since it cover a greater angle. the human eye cant see that kind of extreme wide angle. hence, focal length has nothing to do with giving a "real size" pix. hope i am making sense. hee.. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 86
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
Regards CK |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western side of Singapore
Posts: 1,163
|
I'm no micro expert but I think lifesize reproduction is not a function of focal length but rather that of a lens itself. There are lens which can get you 1:1 or bigger reproduction on the film, i.e. the object is the same size on the negative as it is in real life. To get lifesize prints however, I agree with tomcat that it's just a question of enlarging the print until you get the size you want.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Katong Laksa Land
Posts: 363
|
Thanks all for the replies...
I guess it's a mix up between life-sized printouts vs. "real-life" viewing angle of the human eye. But I get the general idea... ^_^ |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|