ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Canon

Canon Exhilaration Of Sight


 
Thread Tools
Old 26th December 2003   #1
EiRiK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North
Posts: 860
Default 17-40L hood

does the hood included for the 17-40mm L serve its purpose?
any big difference with and without it on?

thanks
__________________
web | blog | facebook
EiRiK is offline  
Old 26th December 2003   #2
Wai
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Pole with Penguins
Posts: 5,131
Default

yes, it occupies so much more space in my backpack with the hood on

i believe the hood should reduce the amount of flare, never really test out the different cos i just leave the hood on
Wai is offline  
Old 26th December 2003   #3
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

Dun have the 17-40 but generally it's advisable to use hoods with wide-angle lenses to reduce glare.

The hood for the 100mm macro usm is also very big and took up so much space
mpenza is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 26th December 2003   #4
oeyvind
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,556
Default

Originally Posted by mpenza
Dun have the 17-40 but generally it's advisable to use hoods with wide-angle lenses to reduce glare.

The hood for the 100mm macro usm is also very big and took up so much space
100mm macro usm hood big? Then what about those of the long tele? Keep the hood on, it reduce glare and protect the glass.
__________________
flickr
oeyvind is offline  
Old 26th December 2003   #5
EiRiK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North
Posts: 860
Default

ic... i know that it is advisable to always keep lens hood on...

just that the hood of the 17-40 looks really weird (very wide and very short)..

anyway, thanks for the info dudes
__________________
web | blog | facebook
EiRiK is offline  
Old 26th December 2003   #6
EiRiK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North
Posts: 860
Default

btw mpenza...

how much did u pay for the 100mm macro hood?
u were refering to the 100mm F2.8 USM macro, right?
__________________
web | blog | facebook
EiRiK is offline  
Old 27th December 2003   #7
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

Originally Posted by oeyvind
100mm macro usm hood big? Then what about those of the long tele? Keep the hood on, it reduce glare and protect the glass.
tim, you mean those nice white hoods for the canon big mamas of 300 f/2.8 and longer?

the lens hoods, if you have it for the wide angle lens, will really um... shine when you try them in darkness - you can see from my shots below:


Shot 1: ISO100, 5 sec, f/3.5


Shot 2: ISO100, 15 sec, f/5.6, hand shielding as "hood"


Shot 3: ISO100, 15 sec, f/8, hand shielding + smaller aperture

As you can see, the first picture really "kenna" from no hood, and I shot it at 24mm wide. Remembering this was shot using DSLR 1.6x crop ==> 36mm FOV, imagine how bad it could have been if it was on a full 24mm FOV! Hence I would highly suggest using a hood in such a situation... Looking at the 2nd and 3rd shot, though there was some "improvement", but you can still easily see the flare of the streetlamp near the top of the image. But see how much hand shielding helped compared to the first pic...

Last edited by sehsuan; 27th December 2003 at 12:28 AM.
sehsuan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.06829 seconds with 7 queries