Page 1 of 7 1236 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 122

Thread: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    123

    Default Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Hi,

    Getting more confuse after i did more on my research in between Canon and Nikon..

    1. Thinking to get Nikon latest model D3000, although body should be quite cheap, but Nikkor lens generally more expensive than Canon's one. (comparing Canon's 50mm f1.8 with Nikkor 35mm f1.8) Overall Nikkor lens will be more expensive than Canon's.

    2. Canon produces warmer pictures, as compared to Nikon, more natural color tone.

    3. Canon having buy back program now, even Canon 500D kit is cheaper than Nikon D5000. For long term, Canon's lens also cheaper and more variety.

    Hard to decide man.....need help!

    I am Canon BIG FAN, but been reading KenRockWell's reviews this few days....kind of influenced by him, started to fall in love with Nikon...haha...


    Thanks for your advise....to guide me out at this JUNCTION...haha

  2. #2

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by wallacetham View Post

    1. Overall Nikkor lens will be more expensive than Canon's.

    2. Canon produces warmer pictures, as compared to Nikon, more natural color tone.

    3. Canon having buy back program now, even Canon 500D kit is cheaper than Nikon D5000. For long term, Canon's lens also cheaper and more variety.
    1. Meh. Look at the price of L glass. And for Nikkor lenses, you get what you pay for - they may cost more, but they're better.

    2. I disagree. I find Canon pictures to have less saturation and a cooler color tone, as compared to the richer Nikon/Sony/Olympus/Pentax pics.

    3. Buy back can be because they're getting clobbered in the market by the Nikon offerings now.
    Alpha

  3. #3
    Member Cartman2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pasir Ris
    Posts
    1,732

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    [3. Canon having buy back program now, even Canon 500D kit is cheaper than Nikon D5000. For long term, Canon's lens also cheaper and more variety.
    Not really, for Nikon you can use the older MF lenses too. Think they're the AIS or something to that effect.

  4. #4
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    since your heart is on Canon, just stay focus, get a Canon, will help you to end your misery.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  5. #5

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
    since your heart is on Canon, just stay focus, get a Canon, will help you to end your misery.
    This man speaks the truth. Can't say that Canon is the best out there, but you can't go wrong with it either.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
    since your heart is on Canon, just stay focus, get a Canon, will help you to end your misery.
    yeah, i know, but we should compare both also....since this is a big step + big investment for me.

    I m using Canon prosumer now (PowerShot A720IS), quite good, just limited by the technology...

    Getting a Nikon might have more fun to play around (different user interface and stuffs....Canon 500D will have similar interface like my Canon PS A720)

    Just my thinking...correct me if i am wrong...haha

  7. #7
    Member Cartman2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Pasir Ris
    Posts
    1,732

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Getting a Nikon might have more fun to play around (different user interface and stuffs....Canon 500D will have similar interface like my Canon PS A720)
    Have you tried the 500D yet?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    765

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Go out and try both system in a shop. See which camera has a better handling for you.

    For me, I use a canon as I am very to it, and find the Nikon system awkward. But I tend to believe that this is a matter of getting used to.

    Apart from that, I think all DSLR systems should have a comprehensive range of lenses. They are all capable of getting good pictures. It is up to the photographer to actually capture the deciding moment. (I hadn't captured mine yet.)

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by Cartman2000 View Post
    Have you tried the 500D yet?
    yeah, i tried before, quite similar to 400D (my friend has it)

    What i mean similar is the function layout, settings, where Nikon totally different..

    Btw, i feel like 500D body abit plastic feeling, worse than 400D...although function is much more powerful!!

  10. #10
    Senior Member Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Upper Bukit Timah
    Posts
    11,650

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    You talked about prices. You talked about function. Have you ever asked yourself what you actually need? You said Nikon lenses are more expensive and Canon have more variety. Are you buying out the entire system or what? Have you even looked into the lenses you are most likely to buy? Nikon's interface is quite different. Have you wondered if you can get used to it?

    Judging from what you wrote, Canon seems a more sensible choice. Your friend is using Canon so you can borrow his lenses. As for Nikon, I think you are just backside itchy.....

  11. #11
    Senior Member ricleo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eastern Singapore
    Posts
    6,549

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    if you're getting a nikon, do get the D80 and upwards. Most of the top end nikon lens are more expensive than their canon counterparts, but if you look at the AF-D lens, they are much more reasonably priced and pretty fast focusing too from my recently ended nikon using experience.
    A7R3|V12|V15|FE28|MS17|MS35|MS50|50lux|50C|50Artis an|FD85L|FE85|90 cron|
    Σ24|35L|Σ50|135L|70-200G2

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    East side
    Posts
    3,704

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    1. Not sure why you compare Canon 50/1.8 with Nikon 35/1.8. There's a Nikon 50/1.8 which is cheap.

    2. Canon PNS are great, because of the pleasing colors they produce. Similarly, the in-cam processor of their DSLRs are (IMHO) ahead of Nikon's. But things are changing for sure.

    Personally, I choose Nikon DSLR because of the excellent ergonomics. Canon PNS for their no-need-PP colors.

    Quote Originally Posted by wallacetham View Post
    Hi,

    Getting more confuse after i did more on my research in between Canon and Nikon..

    1. Thinking to get Nikon latest model D3000, although body should be quite cheap, but Nikkor lens generally more expensive than Canon's one. (comparing Canon's 50mm f1.8 with Nikkor 35mm f1.8) Overall Nikkor lens will be more expensive than Canon's.

    2. Canon produces warmer pictures, as compared to Nikon, more natural color tone.

    3. Canon having buy back program now, even Canon 500D kit is cheaper than Nikon D5000. For long term, Canon's lens also cheaper and more variety.

    Hard to decide man.....need help!

    I am Canon BIG FAN, but been reading KenRockWell's reviews this few days....kind of influenced by him, started to fall in love with Nikon...haha...


    Thanks for your advise....to guide me out at this JUNCTION...haha

  13. #13

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Canon/Nikon/Sony/Olympus all make good cameras. There is no bad cameras now. Only lots of marketing gimmicks. Why do you want to spend time trying to figure out how to use a Nikon when you are familiar with Canon system? If you think Canon colour suits you better,pricing is more affordable for you,holds better in your hand. Get it.

  14. #14
    Senior Member ZerocoolAstra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    rainy Singapore
    Posts
    9,523

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by wallacetham View Post
    Hi,

    Getting more confuse after i did more on my research in between Canon and Nikon..

    1. Thinking to get Nikon latest model D3000, although body should be quite cheap, but Nikkor lens generally more expensive than Canon's one. (comparing Canon's 50mm f1.8 with Nikkor 35mm f1.8) Overall Nikkor lens will be more expensive than Canon's.

    2. Canon produces warmer pictures, as compared to Nikon, more natural color tone.

    3. Canon having buy back program now, even Canon 500D kit is cheaper than Nikon D5000. For long term, Canon's lens also cheaper and more variety.

    Hard to decide man.....need help!

    I am Canon BIG FAN, but been reading KenRockWell's reviews this few days....kind of influenced by him, started to fall in love with Nikon...haha...


    Thanks for your advise....to guide me out at this JUNCTION...haha
    Don't make sweeping statements
    #1: You compare canon 50/1.8 against nikon 35/1.8..... fair comparison hor?? NOT
    #2: You based that conclusion on what evidence? I can make my Nikon's colour output very warm too... especially when tweaking the in-camera JPG processing.
    #3: I do know that both Canon and Nikon make a large variety of lenses. Which maker has a larger variety is unknown to me. But so what if Canon produces 820 different lenses, and Nikon produces 750? The lenses that I own are available across both brands (just comparing focal length and max aperture). Your comment about cheaper seems weak to me, especially since you can use examples like in #1.
    Exploring! :)

  15. #15

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    haha this thread has turned into a brand war already. anyway..



    SONY ALPHA IS THE BEST. cough cough..

  16. #16
    Senior Member limwhow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Life revolves arOnd East Coast
    Posts
    7,049

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by ricleo View Post
    if you're getting a nikon, do get the D80 and upwards. Most of the top end nikon lens are more expensive than their canon counterparts, but if you look at the AF-D lens, they are much more reasonably priced and pretty fast focusing too from my recently ended nikon using experience.
    Why did you end your Nikon-using experience?

  17. #17
    Senior Member limwhow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Life revolves arOnd East Coast
    Posts
    7,049

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kit View Post
    You talked about prices. You talked about function. Have you ever asked yourself what you actually need? You said Nikon lenses are more expensive and Canon have more variety. Are you buying out the entire system or what? Have you even looked into the lenses you are most likely to buy? Nikon's interface is quite different. Have you wondered if you can get used to it?

    Judging from what you wrote, Canon seems a more sensible choice. Your friend is using Canon so you can borrow his lenses. As for Nikon, I think you are just backside itchy.....
    Good. You said it.
    Human beings are creatures of habit.
    Once we are used to something, unless something unpleasant jerked us out of our comfort zone, or something so irresistable present a pull factor, we don't usually jump ship.
    So it all depends very much on what system you laid your hands upon when you first started.
    Of course, along the way many would switch sides for various reasons and that is where the push and pull factors start playing tricks on us.
    All will have their own reasons. And debate till the cows come home, most likely we cannot come to a conclusion.
    Therefore if you have closed ones, friends, family members all using Canon, and you yourself are familiar with Canon, then maybe you will be more comfortable staying put. Don't listen too much or read too much review, otherwise you would be totally confused.

    My humble opinion.

  18. #18
    Member DinoSG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Central Singapore
    Posts
    771

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    hmmm..i heard Canon focusing speed is much faster than nikon but dont know whether if this is true...like in advertisement, they always said those White lens used in sports are Canon's..what do you all think?
    Nikon D610 |NIKON 16-35mm F4G | SIGMA 50mm F1.4G | NIKON 70-200mm F2.8G VRII | NIKON SB600

  19. #19
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by DinoSG View Post
    hmmm..i heard Canon focusing speed is much faster than nikon but dont know whether if this is true...like in advertisement, they always said those White lens used in sports are Canon's..what do you all think?
    Not trying to be a spoilsport here, but did you see the number of BLACK lenses in the last China Olympics?

    Each have their pros and cons. Just choose wisely. I personally went with Nikon for the ergonomics and flash system.
    Last edited by zac08; 17th August 2009 at 01:53 AM.
    Michael Lim
    My Flickr Site

  20. #20

    Default Re: Canon vs Nikon (in term of price and photo style)

    Quote Originally Posted by DinoSG View Post
    they always said those White lens used in sports are Canon's..what do you all think?
    1. It's called sponsorship.

    2. Do you think you can afford/need one of those lenses?
    Alpha

Page 1 of 7 1236 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •