Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Batteries for Film SLR.

  1. #1

    Default Batteries for Film SLR.

    Hi guys, I'm deciding to get a film SLR soon, and I realised that there are a number of different batteries to power the different cameras. Some of the most common ones include 2CR5, CR123. Can some of the pros enlighten me regarding the cost of such batteries and more importantly, generally how many rolls can I get out of them. This is to help me determine the total cost of ownership... Also, are there rechargeable ones; would they be most cost effective in the long run?

  2. #2
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    if you want to save money of battery, get a original batter grip which allows you to use rechargeable AA batteries, but you need to shoot a lot of film to justify the cost of the battery grip.

    So if you don't shoot a lot film, just use Alkaline 2CR5, CR123 battery will do. AFAIK, it is not easy and cost effective to get such rechargeable battery.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  3. #3
    Moderator Octarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pasir Ris
    Posts
    12,388

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    2CR5 (as used in EOS5)
    Home Fix in White Sands: SGD 12.00
    Mustafa: SGD 8.50
    Due to low demand and long storage some of those batteries might not last very long. Had one lemon from Home Fix (Lasted 1 roll / 4 weeks). Unfortunately no receipt anymore. But they promised exchange if the next one fails the same way. But this one lasts now

  4. #4
    Member hongjone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,272

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    I use CR123. Depends on how frequent you shoot and do you keep metering or focuing and etc. My current ones had already tahan 8 rolls. =) Still can use.

    The price ranges are very different. From $6-$11 also have.

    Rechargables ones aren't every cost effective too. Unless you want a battery grip, else the smaller the better.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Thanks dudes. Hmm... I guess full mechanical SLRs would be desired in my case. No need to replace batteries so often... Do you think I should invest on a full mechanical one?

    EDIT:
    Also, I was thinking... wouldn't there be any third party grips available? I shall go google... If any pros got any insights feel free to type away!
    Last edited by lordpain; 2nd August 2009 at 06:06 PM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Some research actually brought me to an attention towards the nikon f401x. Apparently this camera uses AA batteries without a grip. Does canon have a similar offering?

  7. #7

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Quote Originally Posted by lordpain View Post
    Thanks dudes. Hmm... I guess full mechanical SLRs would be desired in my case. No need to replace batteries so often... Do you think I should invest on a full mechanical one?
    OM-1 completely mechanical and an excellent choice. Will shoot without batteries, except for the light meter and with some experience, "sunny 16" rule will let you judge exposure without light meter too.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Oh goodness don't get the F401x. It's one of Nikon's ugly beasts during the transition to AF. If you need just a film camera without AF, something like the old Nikon FM2 will do.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Thanks guys for the constructive comments. Regarding the F401x, what are the cons of getting it? Actually, I am already a digital user of Canon EOS, thus I have a set of EF lenses that can be used if I purchase an EF film body, but apparently the cost of batteries is keeping me at bay. On the other hand, getting a FM2 or OM1 would be a good idea, but that means I have to start another lens collection... Anyone got any views?

  10. #10

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Quote Originally Posted by lordpain View Post
    Thanks guys for the constructive comments. Regarding the F401x, what are the cons of getting it? Actually, I am already a digital user of Canon EOS, thus I have a set of EF lenses that can be used if I purchase an EF film body, but apparently the cost of batteries is keeping me at bay. On the other hand, getting a FM2 or OM1 would be a good idea, but that means I have to start another lens collection... Anyone got any views?
    if the cost of batts is keeping you at bay, what more is the cost of film, processing, scanning etc.. get a set of Lithium batts, would last you abt 20 rolls.. or you can get a fixed lens rangefinder if you don't wanna spend so much on a film system..

  11. #11

    Default Re: Batteries for Film SLR.

    Since you're already using a Canon system, why not get one of the Canon film SLRs, and add the battery grip to use AA batteries?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •