Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Developing photos vs converting to cd

  1. #1

    Default Developing photos vs converting to cd

    Would like to ask with a normal 35mm film, is it better to develop the photo or convert to cd?

    2) how badly affected of the quality to convert to cd instead of developing it

    3) does it make sense to convert to cd when using 35mm film?

    I'm asking this is when i bought my film from a shop the auntie asked me why i'm using film, need to spend $$ to develop so when i say now can convert to cd, she said whats the point?

    so i would like to ask ppl here for your comments

  2. #2

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    hi,

    you need to DEVELOP the film before you can SCAN it, and then CONVERT TO CD

    as for quality of print output from SCANNED IMAGE versus FILM, i think FILM still better, but you can ask for a higher resolution scan (16 base), that will cost more.

  3. #3
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,901

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    FYI, unless you still can find those old old school color lab using analog printing machine in Singapore, almost all lab nowadays SCAN your negative first and print it digitally.

    so you print from a neg, or scan it into CD and print it from digital file, it is still all in digital.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  4. #4
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,901

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    in term of cost saving, you should go fully digital. just simply do your math and you will know why.

    unless you want to have the character of film, that is different story, but prepare to pay a premium for going analog.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  5. #5

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
    FYI, unless you still can find those old old school color lab using analog printing machine in Singapore, almost all lab nowadays SCAN your negative first and print it digitally.

    so you print from a neg, or scan it into CD and print it from digital file, it is still all in digital.
    good info.

    you learn something new everyday from uncle catchlights.

    btw, does it mean, if you request for bigger size print from the lab, they will scan higher res?

  6. #6
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,901

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    Quote Originally Posted by night86mare View Post
    good info.

    you learn something new everyday from uncle catchlights.

    btw, does it mean, if you request for bigger size print from the lab, they will scan higher res?
    let me check with my lab to confirm.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  7. #7
    Moderator Clown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,779

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    AFAIK, yes for fuji frontier machines.
    ask for scanning for the largest print size (10x15) and they'll give u a scan of about 14mp, which is the max the scanning head can go.
    sigh.

  8. #8
    Deregistered shaoken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Clementi/West Coast
    Posts
    2,115

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    Quote Originally Posted by fudgecake83 View Post
    Would like to ask with a normal 35mm film, is it better to develop the photo or convert to cd?

    2) how badly affected of the quality to convert to cd instead of developing it

    3) does it make sense to convert to cd when using 35mm film?

    I'm asking this is when i bought my film from a shop the auntie asked me why i'm using film, need to spend $$ to develop so when i say now can convert to cd, she said whats the point?

    so i would like to ask ppl here for your comments
    For me, I would prefer scanning it to CD.
    So that you won't need to spend money for reprints when the prints come out not what you've expected.

    When save into CD, you can even do PP on it for your own usage.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Anson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    ansonchew.com
    Posts
    8,210

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    Curious is it possible to develop the film only?

  10. #10

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    Quote Originally Posted by Anson View Post
    Curious is it possible to develop the film only?
    yes. i do that n scan it myself.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    174

    Default Re: Developing photos vs converting to cd

    16 base resolution is how many dpi?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •