9th December 2003, 11:18 AM
Difference between Teleplus Pro 300 & MC7
Can anyone enlighten what are the differences between the Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 2X and the Teleplus MC 7 2X? Aren't they having the same functions?
9th December 2003, 05:31 PM
the difference should be the optic quality.
It's the same as questioning, what's the difference between B+W MRC UV filter with an al cheapo-10-buck uv filter
9th December 2003, 05:45 PM
i heard the mc7 & 300 r the same thing. the only diff is: the 300 takes AF-S & mc7 r meant for older lenses with old AF mechanism.
i 've used the mc7 & it looks very good. no CA, no softness, colour is good, contrast good, etc. haven't used a 300 tho...
9th December 2003, 06:02 PM
Thanks .. probably the ability to take AFS could account for the cost difference. Couldn't be sure about the optic quality though unless someone has done the test. However I'm quite confident the Pro 300 has better optic even marginal.
Originally Posted by nightpiper
9th December 2003, 06:18 PM
Last edited by amateur_photographer; 9th December 2003 at 06:22 PM.
10th December 2003, 11:15 AM
Thanks for the clarification..used my Pro 300 on my S2 and D1X and found a little softness too .. part of a TC characteristic I suppose.
Originally Posted by amateur_photographer