Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

  1. #1

    Default Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

    Hey guys, can anyone advise me on the performance between these two lens? I suppose L-len will produce sharper image. However, it seem that 70-300 IS outperfom L-len if shoot with handheld? Anyone use these two lens before?

    To have sharp image, do you think the 70-200F4L len should shoot with tripod rather than handheld?

    Thank you for your advise in advance ..

  2. #2

    Default Re: Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

    actually between the 2 i will choose the 55-250 IS.
    You wont see me much less remember me but i am the guy who makes you look good.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

    Get a 55-250 and save up for the 70-200 f4 IS. The difference between the 55-250 and 70-300 is not great enough to warrant the $ difference. I'm sure some people can hand hold 200mm at 1/60, but for the majority of us a telephoto lense without IS is useless in lower light conditions without a tripod/monopod.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

    Definately save up for 70-200 f4

  5. #5

    Default Re: Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

    Thanks for the reply. Since most of us could not shoot well for telephoto len without IS, how come the 70-200 F4L len so expensive.. haha...

  6. #6

    Default Re: Canon len 70-200 F4L (non Is) Vs 70-300 F4-5.6 IS

    There were some discussions on these 3 lenses (70-200 F4L, 70-300mm F4-5.6 USM and EF S 55-250mm IS) think may be useful for you, I have the 70-300mm am happy with the image quality.
    http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showt...F+70-300mm+USM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •