Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 57

Thread: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Hi all,

    I thought I would post some photos from my new DA*60-250 f4 for anyone who is interested. These are not the brick wall or test chart type test photos, but "real world" photos of subjects that we may all like to take photos of.

    I went down to a local lake and took photos of some local birdlife and these are the results. If anyone is loking for a lens around this zoom range, then the DA*60-250 f4 is superb, IMO. Excellent sharpness, bokeh (for a zoom), colour rendition and the handling is very good.

    I have the DA*50-135 f2.8 and the FA*80-200 f2.8 as well, and I think that both of them will rarely get used now that I have this lens. I can save 1.1kg in weight by only having the DA*60-250 and also a spot in my camera bag!

    There is no doubt that the FA*80-200 f2.8 is a stellar lens, but the DA*60-250 f4 looks like it may be able to match it.

    Highly recommended.

    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 88mm, 1/25sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 250mm, 1/125sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 170mm, 1/160sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 250mm, 1/100sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 250mm, 1/400sec, ISO200



    More images in subsequent posts

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default 2nd set of images

    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f6.3, 250mm, 1/200sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f6.3, 250mm, 1/100sec, ISO400



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f6.3, 250mm, 1/100sec, ISO400



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f6.3, 200mm, 1/100sec, ISO400


  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default 3rd set of images

    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f6.3, 250mm, 1/80sec, ISO400



    Crop of the photo above. How good is this!!!



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 180mm, 1/125sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 180mm, 1/200sec, ISO200



    K20D + DA*60-250 f4 @ f5.6, 180mm, 1/160sec, ISO200

    Last edited by Lance B; 18th June 2009 at 10:50 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    East
    Posts
    5,154

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Thank you for posting these, Lance. I tried this briefly when Mark was in town, and I was pleasantly surprised at its size and weight (in a good way). I actually didn't really feel that it's that big especially if the hood's off.

    The focusing is surprising fast as well, at least my 1st experience in a pretty badly litted room with a K20D. If I've not been targetting the FA*200mm, I may have just got this instead.

  5. #5

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Hey Lance. I knew you are gonna post some good sample photos by this lens, but I didn't expect they'd be ssoooo good. That lens seems to be a great performer, of course when it's in the right hands

    You made me wanna change my F*300/4.5 to this zoomy ...

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Still wondering where I belong
    Posts
    3,434

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Quote Originally Posted by fengwei View Post
    Hey Lance. I knew you are gonna post some good sample photos by this lens, but I didn't expect they'd be ssoooo good. That lens seems to be a great performer, of course when it's in the right hands

    You made me wanna change my F*300/4.5 to this zoomy ...
    F*300mm...
    Gallery|Baby gallery
    I have become an expert in cleaning poo

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hougang
    Posts
    566

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Wow,

    Your super 60-250mm make me much want to buy this good lense. Time for me to save up until buy this. Thank you for posting your super images....

    One question is I wonder if this 60-250mm with K20D can catch fast moving objects like F1???

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West of Singapore
    Posts
    1,087

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Come on Mr. LBA, I want to see the shootout between 60-250 and 300 @ f4.
    K-5IIs, DA16-85, DFA50, DFA100, DA*60-250, 540FGZ II, 160FC, 201FG

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    "River end"
    Posts
    4,249

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Thanks for sharing and very beautiful photos. I find the lens would be even nicer if it is IF but overall, it is definitely a lens worth consider getting for itís performance.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    East
    Posts
    5,154

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Des, IF would be lovely, but from another point of view, at least it's smaller to keep in the bag.

  11. #11

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Hi,

    Would you be able to handheld this lens? How low is the shuttle before one needs to use a tripod at the long end?

  12. #12

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Quote Originally Posted by simdavid View Post
    Hi,

    Would you be able to handheld this lens? How low is the shuttle before one needs to use a tripod at the long end?
    W/ the new K-7 camera, no problem handheld shooting at 1/60s on the 250mm end:



    Or even 1/20s:


  13. #13

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Wow..keena poison...lol

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Quote Originally Posted by hjbyeo View Post
    Thank you for posting these, Lance. I tried this briefly when Mark was in town, and I was pleasantly surprised at its size and weight (in a good way). I actually didn't really feel that it's that big especially if the hood's off.

    The focusing is surprising fast as well, at least my 1st experience in a pretty badly litted room with a K20D. If I've not been targetting the FA*200mm, I may have just got this instead.
    Thank you and it is a pleasure to post them. I hope that this will help people to decide whether this lens is suitable for them.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Quote Originally Posted by fengwei View Post
    Hey Lance. I knew you are gonna post some good sample photos by this lens, but I didn't expect they'd be ssoooo good. That lens seems to be a great performer, of course when it's in the right hands
    As usual, Frank, you are way too kind. Thank you very much for your nice comments, mate.

    You made me wanna change my F*300/4.5 to this zoomy ...
    Don't be too hasty, my friend. There is one small issue with the DA*60-250 f4 and that is that when you focus on a close subject and you are extended to 250mm, the lens is not really 250mm when focused close, more like 200mm. So, of you want reach *and* to focus close, then keep your F*300 as it is a gem too. I am keeping my 300.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: 3rd set of images

    Quote Originally Posted by woonsin View Post
    Wow,

    Your super 60-250mm make me much want to buy this good lense. Time for me to save up until buy this. Thank you for posting your super images....
    Thank you very much for your kind comments, woonsin.

    One question is I wonder if this 60-250mm with K20D can catch fast moving objects like F1???
    I have yet to try this on fast moving subject matter. I will try this over the coming weeks and hopefully report back.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Quote Originally Posted by sbc View Post
    Come on Mr. LBA, I want to see the shootout between 60-250 and 300 @ f4.
    I will try it soon, I hope.

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Quote Originally Posted by istDeS View Post
    Thanks for sharing and very beautiful photos.
    Thank you for your kind comments.

    I find the lens would be even nicer if it is IF but overall, it is definitely a lens worth consider getting for itís performance.
    It is Internal Focus, just not Internal Zoom. I do not think that it the fact that it is not Internal Zoom is too much of a problem, for me anyway.

    I think that Pentax decided to not make it an Internal Zoom because it would compromise quality and also add to cost and probably weight. I am quite happy that they made this decision.

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Quote Originally Posted by hjbyeo View Post
    Des, IF would be lovely, but from another point of view, at least it's smaller to keep in the bag.
    It is Internal Focus, just not Internal Zoom.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: DA*60-250 f4 "test" photos x 14 images

    Quote Originally Posted by simdavid View Post
    Hi,

    Would you be able to handheld this lens? How low is the shuttle before one needs to use a tripod at the long end?
    All these shots were handheld, with SR on.

    With SR on, you should be able to get down to about 1/30sec at 250mm with practice and a stationary subject and reasonably easily at 1/60sec. The first photo in the 3rd set of images was handheld at 1/80sec and as you can see by the crop, it is razor sharp!

    The rule of thumb is 1/focal length x 1.5. So, for a 200mm lens this is 1/200x1.5 = 1/300sec. With SR, you can easily get 2 stops and with practice 3 stops slower shutter speed. If you are very careful, you can get up to 4 stops depending on the lens. So, with the same 200mm lens, then 2 stops - 1/200 x 1.5 = 1/300 sec, then 1/150sec, then 1/75sec. For 3 stops - 1/200 x 1.5 = 1/300 sec then 1/150 sec, then 1/75 sec, then 1/38sec.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •