Differences in the ISO 200 films.

shaoken · 18th June 2009

I have used the Fuji Superia 200 films but I heard that the Lucky 200 is also not bad.

Any ideas between the differences between these 2 films?

I know CS have a comparison table but there is no review for the Lucky 200 films. So I need advices from you guys.

Thanks.

corona · 21st July 2009

If both are ISO 200 film there's no difference in performance except
maybe result and personal preference.

yilishengxian · 27th July 2009

Lucky 200:
http://elrilmatheren.multiply.com/ph...ry_19_Jul_2009

Superia 200:
http://elrilmatheren.multiply.com/ph...g_11_June_2009

Same lens, same camera, same scanner.

18th June 2009	#1
shaoken Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Clementi/West Coast Posts: 1,289	Differences in the ISO 200 films. I have used the Fuji Superia 200 films but I heard that the Lucky 200 is also not bad. Any ideas between the differences between these 2 films? I know CS have a comparison table but there is no review for the Lucky 200 films. So I need advices from you guys. Thanks. __________________ Photo Blog\|Modeling Portfolio Olympus User

21st July 2009	#2
corona Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 75	Re: Differences in the ISO 200 films. If both are ISO 200 film there's no difference in performance except maybe result and personal preference.

27th July 2009	#3
yilishengxian Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pandan 花园 Posts: 3,795	Re: Differences in the ISO 200 films. Lucky 200: http://elrilmatheren.multiply.com/ph...ry_19_Jul_2009 Superia 200: http://elrilmatheren.multiply.com/ph...g_11_June_2009 Same lens, same camera, same scanner. __________________ Every Photo Speaks for its Photographer. 开心就好。 My GWC Collection