Canon 70~200mm f/2.8 IS L USM or Canon 70~200 f/4 IS L USM?
Which would be better (lets not compare in the manner of "more expensive is much better" ) for taking photos of pretty much every thing?
I've got a friend who told me that f/4 is good enough to take photos of moving objects. More skills is required rather then better gear. I agree with him.
So currently I'm planning on getting my first L series lens.