![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 85
|
I have a nikon D80 and use it for Macro when coupled with a Tamron 90mm. The details captured are quiet sharp but want more.
![]() How can i magnify what i take with this setup? What's the best way to do this? Extension tubes, Raynox attachment....what? ![]() Appreciate your replies! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 68
|
close-up filter
__________________
D700+MB-D10 | 17-35 f2.8-4 | 24-70 f2.8 | 70-200 f2.8 VR | 50 f1.8 | 55 f2.8 | 105 f2.5 | SB-900 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bishan
Posts: 894
|
Some people max it out using both macro filters and extension tubes on macro lenses but there will be a significant loss of light.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 854
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 85
|
so considering the fact that i have enough light.....(flash(es)/ daylight/ studio lights).....extension tubes are a more logical choice since they would maintain the quality of the shots.
Thanks for the suggestions. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jurong
Posts: 2,258
|
what about teleconverter? will TC increase magnification on Macro lens as well? eg. 1:1 lens, with TC 1.4x will give me 1.4:1?
anyone can confirm this? Sorry TS, Since this regarding about increasing of magnification, I borrow this thread to ask my question. hope u dun mind.
__________________
Canon 7D + EFS10-22 + EF24-105L + Tamron 180 Macro + 580EXII + 10 Camera carrier Last edited by egnaro; 4th June 2009 at 09:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 85
|
Absolutely. No problem.
About your question below....for eg: if you are using a 90mm lens for the macro....with a 2X TC, the lens is effectively a 180 mm lens....hence a bigger focussing distance.....or does the focussing distance remain the same while increasing the magnification!!!! Dunno if someone can confirm that??? Looking for the answer too.
Last edited by icecube4u; 4th June 2009 at 05:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
I don't think many ppl will use a 2x TC as the image quality will degrade too much for good macro work where sharpness of detail and is important.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/headfonz/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ~Sunny Little Island~
Posts: 1,262
|
Getting a macro close up to stack will shorten the distance you need to get to the subject, thus revealing about more details. However, DOF is going to be much thinner and you will need to have high shutter to compensate for the handshakes.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ang Mo Kio
Posts: 988
|
Using a longer lens with an appropriate close-up filter would give you better magnification. A 100mm with the Raynox will give u less magnification than a 300mm with a Raynox. I find myself often going to larger than life-size with a 75-300 + Raynox DCR-250 combi. However, note also that the larger your magnification, the harder it is to handhold and compose, especially at weird angles. =)
I think you can use a long lens with a reversed wide-angle lens too, though that'd give u very little working distance.
__________________
incywincyspider climbup the waterspout... |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jurong
Posts: 2,258
|
__________________
Canon 7D + EFS10-22 + EF24-105L + Tamron 180 Macro + 580EXII + 10 Camera carrier |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: East
Posts: 71
|
This link may be of interest to those who want to do macro with different techniques...
http://www.jr-worldwi.de/photo/index...technique.html |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
If you want to do really high magnification in the field, then a reverse lens combination will probably get you more magnification for the buck.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/headfonz/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S'pore
Posts: 1,654
|
Has anyone tried Kenko Pro 2x or 3x teleconverter with a macro lens?
Samples images are appreciated pleassse.
__________________
D90 & P5100 |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jurong
Posts: 2,258
|
not advisable... IMHO, 1st of all Kenko is 3rd party I doubt it will give you good glass maybe just decent (I dun noe, I dun use)... 2nd 2x or 3x will drop at least 2 stop, 3rd degrade of IQ may not be too acceptable...
__________________
Canon 7D + EFS10-22 + EF24-105L + Tamron 180 Macro + 580EXII + 10 Camera carrier |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 599
|
Hi all,
You can consider the Raynox macro converter lenses such as DCR-250. Please note these are not close-up filters which are actually simple magnifying lenses only. For details, see below: http://www.mcgill.com.sg/shop/produc...182030500a533b Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S'pore
Posts: 1,654
|
I'm thinking more of using a teleconverter as the minimum focus distance remains the same. However, the Raynox seems good too as the IQ is good but MFD is shortened.
__________________
D90 & P5100 |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|