ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Canon

Canon Exhilaration Of Sight


 
Thread Tools
Old 22nd November 2003   #1
popeye
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 503
Default D60 (second hand) or new 300D

Hi guys,
provided it's on the same or similar price,
which one is bang for the buck? second hand D60 or new 300D?
popeye is offline  
Old 22nd November 2003   #2
Nemo2003
Member
 
Nemo2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern End of SG
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by popeye
Hi guys,
provided it's on the same or similar price,
which one is bang for the buck? second hand D60 or new 300D?
I'll go for 300D that's for sure. Never like to buy 2nd hand camera.
Nemo2003 is offline  
Old 23rd November 2003   #3
scud
Senior Member
 
scud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,701
Default

yup, 2nd for body may not be a good idea. i will go for 300D.
scud is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 23rd November 2003   #4
NorthernLights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,085
Default Not true

Hi,

Not true that a 2nd hand body is not good.

It depends on what you want.

D60 - Better built body. Higher end than 300D in terms of market segment. Slower AF, poorer performance under low light, heavier.

300D - Plastic, cheaper body, faster AF, Better under low light, can take EF-S lens, lighter, newer technology, since it's similar to 10D.
__________________
Leica digital user:thumbsup
http://www.flickr.com/photos/justphotography/
NorthernLights is offline  
Old 23rd November 2003   #5
Nemo2003
Member
 
Nemo2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern End of SG
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by NorthernLights
Hi,

Not true that a 2nd hand body is not good.

It depends on what you want.

D60 - Better built body. Higher end than 300D in terms of market segment. Slower AF, poorer performance under low light, heavier.

300D - Plastic, cheaper body, faster AF, Better under low light, can take EF-S lens, lighter, newer technology, since it's similar to 10D.
So after your comparison, should I say 300D is a better buy, right? So Popeye what are you waiting for? 300D selling hot cake now.
Nemo2003 is offline  
Old 23rd November 2003   #6
NorthernLights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,085
Default D60

I would buy a D60 as it is a better built body for the same price...

AF, low light all can be overcome:

AF - Pre-focussing on target. Most of time in fact it is good to do.

Low light - Use the 420EX or 550EX AF assist.
__________________
Leica digital user:thumbsup
http://www.flickr.com/photos/justphotography/
NorthernLights is offline  
Old 23rd November 2003   #7
ST1100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Singapore, Bedok
Posts: 1,801
Default

It's really a tossup.

300D has some limitations that can drive some people crazy. Like the lack of a dedicated one-shot AF mode; it's permanently in AI focus. Like the lack of a flash compensation - again, can drive you nuts when you really need it.

Advantage is that the 300D will come new, and certainly with warranty - peace of mind for a 1.5k+ investment. The price also won't be plummeting so soon.

i think a 300D would suffice for most applications, unless your style/work demands some of the missing features.

But if one is seriously considering the D60, maybe the 10D (used) would be a better choice.
ST1100 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.07208 seconds with 7 queries