![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 21
|
If you are me, will you think to upgrade to K-7 or K20d just enough?
Worth the price? I am using K100d Super, and now tempted with K-7 spec. Is anyone can give opinion is it worth to upgrade to K-7, by passing th K20d? Since the K-7 price almost double the K-20d. in Amazon, K-7-usd1299 K-20d-usd699 __________________ I'm Pentax K100D Super user with 18-55 | 50-200 | fa43 | sigma 10-20 | DFA100 MACRO 540 FGZ |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 194
|
<poison>K-7 of course!</poison>
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,358
|
the k20d is going to be very value for money, as the k10d was when k20d was the best offering...
if you are budget constrained, i say k20d, it is a joy to use, even if it doesn't have the additional features k7 offers.... but if you have the money..... then go for the best. i do not regret buying the k20d even when it wasn't that cheap when i got it ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,370
|
Plenty of life still in the K20D's excellent CMOS sensor.
Obviously the K-7 is darn good but not likely you can get your hands on one so quickly, and even if you do, you'll be paying a premium. On the other hand, the K20D is almost rock bottom price wise and you can get it almost immediately without having to wait.
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Delta
Posts: 3,675
|
I am very happy with my K20D which I got in late march 09. Being poisoned by the K-7 does not mean that I will jump into it straight away but will wait for the price to stablise first. But that is a full featured camera.
![]()
__________________
Ricoh XR-P,Chinon CP-7m,Pentax Z-1SE/MZ-S/K20D+16-50mm F2.8+FA43mm F1.9 Limited,Metz 58 AF-1P |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,370
|
![]()
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Delta
Posts: 3,675
|
![]()
__________________
Ricoh XR-P,Chinon CP-7m,Pentax Z-1SE/MZ-S/K20D+16-50mm F2.8+FA43mm F1.9 Limited,Metz 58 AF-1P |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: "River end"
Posts: 2,917
|
concur with creampuff, if you have the $$$$ and K-7 is within your budget, just get the K-7.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 913
|
Actually, I'll have got the K20D at its current bargain price, and bypass the K-7, but for one thing: the size of the K20D. I like small cameras, and the K20D is just too big for me. Not sure if this is a factor for you. If not, it just comes down to cheaper, excellent camera (K20D) vs more expensive, cutting-edge and excellent camera (K-7).
__________________
le petit photographe |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,587
|
i was in your footsteps a month ago, had a K100DS but tempted by the low prices of the K20D and rumours of the imminent announcement of a new cam. i would suggest that you keep shooting with the K100DS until the K-7 appears on the market and its new features are properly evaluated.
imo you won't go wrong with either camera.. you can pay more for the new features of the K-7 or pay less and maybe use the funds for a new lens. it just depends on how much whether you value the new features and improvements at US$600+. which is why i suggest giving more time for the initial fever to die down so you can make a better decision. anyway, i didn't wait for the K-7 as i knew it would be priced out of my budget, regardless of how groundbreaking it would've been. in fact i might not have even upgraded to the K20D if not for the fact that someone bought over my K100DS. that's how cheapo i am hehe. Last edited by darrrrrrrrrr; 24th May 2009 at 09:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,370
|
![]()
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,370
|
... patient needs video and plenty of magnesium...
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ Last edited by creampuff; 24th May 2009 at 09:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,587
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,587
|
everyone pls take precautionary measures, have to ban the travel of foreigners in affected areas such as mark dimo. might have to halt all pentax outings once the first K-7 case hit our shores to prevent inter-human transmission. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 913
|
![]() Having handled friends' D90, D200, D700 and Canon 40D before, as well as the K20D, our Pentax K20D isn't big yah. But they all just feel too bulky and enormous in my hands leh. I like the K100Ds size -- seems kind of perfect for me. Was also considering K-m as 2nd body, but its lower-spec in many ways, being entry-level model. So I was hoping for a higher-end model than my K100Ds in a compact size, but not too hopeful, looking at sizes of K20D and other brand's semi-pro models. And oh man, the K-7 came along.... what can I say, it's fate :P
__________________
le petit photographe |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,370
|
My crystal ball says the July photo outing will be a product shoot... all of us taking pictures of the K-7... but we need someone to volunteer one first... do we need a model release?
![]()
__________________
http://ideastoprint.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Coast Road
Posts: 643
|
If I had waited ...but the force was strong so I ended up with K20D and ...my k100d still takes great pictures ....althought it is resting in the cabinet.But looking at k20D teh resolution on Pentax Gallery is still cannot be achieved by K20D ... so rest in pace with K20D ... and waited for another three years.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 21
|
Thanks for the quick responses above, appreciated that.
This is what I like being into Pentax family, which the harmonic and warmth you could never find anywhere else. No conclusion has come to the end yet..awaiting to see the real K-7 reviews from the coming up owners. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,214
|
Well, what's definitely true is that if you don't mind secondhand there should be lots of great deals coming up. hahaha.
Probably get a K7 if it's within budget ![]() Of course, yes, you gotta wait till it's available, and at that point, you might as well wait for a proper set of evaluations! |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 393
|
I'm probably late but..
I can only say - pay for the extra features only if you feel like it'll strongly help your shooting, or at least be worth the extra cost! Me, i love the highly acclaimed more-accurate, faster, lowlight focusing. My k200d hunts terribly in night shooting, which i do alot of. So much that i've given up missing shots - i now "tikum" as best as i can and bracket 3 shots within the focus range of f1.4. I know the AF probably still won't be good enough for the night shots i take, but at least i won't have to pull my hair and go "WALAO SO EASY ALSO CANT FOCUS @#$%^" for the not-so-dark situations Hope that helped ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|