![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 100
|
Anyone had experience with both? Which is better buy? Metz is easier to get and it's wireless.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East
Posts: 1,950
|
I went over to K13 2 weeks ago, and saw the Metz one ... cannot try it, but appears really easy to use. There's no 49mm adapter though and no 77mm adapter as well. For those using the DA*16-50 or the D FA macro lenses, you'll need a step up or step down ring.
As for its usage, the demo from the Metz one is as simple as changing the mode to PTTL. Anyways, I haven't use the Metz or the AF160 ... maybe Ben could tell us more about the pentax ring flash?
__________________
Pentaxian | apwp flickr Last edited by hjbyeo; 21st May 2009 at 10:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 673
|
Pentax AF-160FC comes with 4 adapter rings 49mm, 52mm, 58mm & 67mm as well as a Macro Adapter for DFA macro lens. The Macro Adapter replace the DFA lens hood when use with 160FC.
Last edited by Ben Loke; 21st May 2009 at 10:58 PM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,158
|
How much is the Metz going for here? After seeing Ben's AF-160 in action, I'm very tempted to get a ring flash too.
Seems like the Pentax is a little smaller, but if the Metz can work properly as a slave unit, then it doesn't need to be connected by any cables and can just be triggered by the pop up flash? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 673
|
Sure. ![]() During May 16th BT outing, I used the AF-160FC+DFA 100mm Macro throughout. Either set the capture mode to Green Mode or AP Auto Exposure, the results between them has no difference. This was taken at Green Mode & A settings. ![]() This was AP Auto Exposure. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 673
|
The AF-160FC is fixed cabled between the controller & flash which I found a bit inconvenient when mount & dismount the ring flash. The older AF-140C was a different design, the cable is detachable at the controler. So handling is easier. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 100
|
Sg500. How much is AF-160? Should be much higher right? |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,158
|
That's cheap! Where did you find it? I checked Adorama and B&H, and both sites sell it at US$400. I think Ben got a very good price for the AF-160 too, can't remember how much. But I don't think it'll be easy to get in Singapore.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 100
|
looks like no one here had any experience with Metz on our Pentax...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East
Posts: 1,950
|
10 dollars cheaper at K13. 490;
__________________
Pentaxian | apwp flickr |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 577
|
Beside ring flash, anyone try double flash for macro shots or triple flash?
Flash bracket may be needed. I am still exploring too. marcus |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Contributor
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,158
|
But it's super unwieldy, and I gave up after a couple of tries in Bukit Timah last week. Could barely hold the camera steady to get my shots in focus. So if you're going to try, I'd say get some really small and light slave flash, and definitely use a flash bracket. For ring flashes, Tumax has one that works with P-TTL too, but seems nowhere as good as the Pentax or the Metz. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 577
|
Seems heavy for the set-up. Probably needs tripod and flash bracket for double flash. Will be gettilng another cheapo second flash to try. Tks. otc |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: "River end"
Posts: 2,908
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,158
|
Yup, I was thinking of that. But without the grip, the flash head will be kind of high (I think it's nice to have it as close the same level as the lens as possible), not sure if that's an issue.
Anyway, the whole setup will still be very unbalanced I think, so I'm guessing a ring flash is a better (but costlier) idea. Alternatively, I'm also considering rigging up a pair of small slave flashes, best if they can be triggered by the pop-up flash directly. Something like this (taken from the Tumax product catalogue): ![]() But the bracket (at least the bar in the middle, the two at the side can be exactly like the ones you're using) probably has to be custom made, as I've never seen one like this in stores both online and traditional. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East
Posts: 1,950
|
Des, how can I get this?
__________________
Pentaxian | apwp flickr |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: "River end"
Posts: 2,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 673
|
I got my AF-160 at around S$550.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 100
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|