View Poll Results: Which to Get???

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • Tamron 17-50mm 2.8

    8 53.33%
  • Panasonic LX3

    7 46.67%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 31

Thread: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

  1. #1

    Default Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    hey guys I just sold my 17-55mm to get a 80-200mm 2.8 and a 85mm 1.8

    my set up is a D90

    main reason y i sold the 17-55 was because its dx and i don't want to hold it for too long as the price is dropping quite fast and the demand i worry might drop futher due to the intro of FX stuff.

    i love the new lenses but i will be needing something for wider stuff.

    Was wondering if i should get a Tamron 17-50 or a Panasonic Lx3..

    I know the pros and cons but i just thought of getting opinions from other people\



    THANKS and CHEERS

  2. #2
    Senior Member ricleo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eastern Singapore
    Posts
    6,549

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    isn't the tamron 17-50 a DX lens as well? but it is much cheaper though. If u no longer have the kit lens of the D90, i guess the 17-50 will make sense as a walkabout lens.

    if you still have the kit lens, might as well keep using it and get the lx3 as a portable camera for the times a dslr is too heavy.
    A7R3|V12|V15|FE28|MS17|MS35|MS50|50lux|50C|50Artis an|FD85L|FE85|90 cron|
    Σ24|35L|Σ50|135L|70-200G2

  3. #3

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    yeah its a DX too but at least it doesn't cost like 1500 hhahhah

    i don't have the 18-55 sold it cos i need the 2.8 so yeah

  4. #4

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    What's the purpose of the Panasonic LX-3?

  5. #5

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Quote Originally Posted by chickenwing View Post
    hey guys I just sold my 17-55mm to get a 80-200mm 2.8 and a 85mm 1.8

    my set up is a D90

    main reason y i sold the 17-55 was because its dx and i don't want to hold it for too long as the price is dropping quite fast and the demand i worry might drop futher due to the intro of FX stuff.

    i love the new lenses but i will be needing something for wider stuff.

    Was wondering if i should get a Tamron 17-50 or a Panasonic Lx3..

    I know the pros and cons but i just thought of getting opinions from other people\



    THANKS and CHEERS
    Actually you should tell us what's the urgency of getting either one.

    Buy only when you need it for certain shoots, not buying it when you think you want it, if not you will lose more when you sell them later.

    But if I were you, then maybe use the kit lens for your wide angle requirement, and buy LX3 as the light travel camera. So you covered all your bases.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    you do notice that they are very different things

  7. #7
    Moderator diver-hloc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Somewhere North
    Posts
    5,201

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Err... like ClubSNAP-er - night86mare - pointed out.... One is a LENS and the other is a manual capable PnS Camera.

    Could TS at least tell us what you 'Planned' to do ??

    Scuba & Father... For Life

  8. #8

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    i think get lx3 good idea, smaller than carry around d90 with 17-50mm. plus i think i understand u want take good portrait and can telephoto. to u wide angle shots can be covered by lx3 right?

    lx3 can put inside pocket and carry around. d90 cannot. so to me. i think lx3 is kewl to have since u so worried about dx lens so much.
    Haumau
    "Travelling light, no more bulky items."

  9. #9

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Hey guys oki just need something for wider purposes like wider stuff compared to my 80-200 and 85mm

    y i thought of getting a lx3 was to make it easier to shoot instead of switching lenses.

    i like portraits ut also like walk about and general photography so thats why i need a wider angle compared to my 80mm stuff

  10. #10
    Moderator diver-hloc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Somewhere North
    Posts
    5,201

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Then Buy the LX3 and sell away your whole DSLR collection.... wouldn't have to change lens anymore.... plus will save you some money.

    Scuba & Father... For Life

  11. #11
    Senior Member ZerocoolAstra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    rainy Singapore
    Posts
    9,523

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Quote Originally Posted by chickenwing View Post
    Hey guys oki just need something for wider purposes like wider stuff compared to my 80-200 and 85mm

    y i thought of getting a lx3 was to make it easier to shoot instead of switching lenses.

    i like portraits ut also like walk about and general photography so thats why i need a wider angle compared to my 80mm stuff
    walkabout and general photography?
    I thought the D90's kit lens covered that pretty well.

    Any reason why you insist on f/2.8?
    Do you use the widest aperture for your walkabout shots?
    Exploring! :)

  12. #12

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    while LX3 is a good cam, it can never win D90. Getting a tamron would yield better results
    Looking for Photographers? | My Portfolio
    http://www.photoera.uni.cc/ | http://folio.navlem.com/

  13. #13

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    the D90 i bought did no come with a lens just body.

    i like to shoot wide open of bokeh

    wider shots don't really need wide open.

  14. #14
    Senior Member ZerocoolAstra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    rainy Singapore
    Posts
    9,523

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    My assumption is that you'd be using your wide angles for landscapes mainly, thus you'd be stepping down at least to f/8 for a greater depth of field.
    This largely negates the benefit of needing a fast lens.
    BUT BUT BUT. Wide angle lenses aren't only used for landscapes, thus the wide aperture COULD be beneficial to your style of photography. I've found no need for myself, but these are all personal choices.
    Exploring! :)

  15. #15

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    i am just thinking there are days i don't want to bring out a big cam

    and

    there are times when i need a wider shot and i don't have time to change lenses i can just whip out the pns.

    i am leaning more towards the LX3 but just wanted to see the more senior/ expert view on it.

    i have been impressed by alot of the lx3 pictures and its macro abilities too.

    like i said looking for advice and comments
    and there have been alot that i appreciate.

    more is welcomed

  16. #16
    Senior Member geraldkhoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Tiny Red Dot
    Posts
    2,571

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Quote Originally Posted by chickenwing View Post
    i am just thinking there are days i don't want to bring out a big cam

    and

    there are times when i need a wider shot and i don't have time to change lenses i can just whip out the pns.

    i am leaning more towards the LX3 but just wanted to see the more senior/ expert view on it.

    i have been impressed by alot of the lx3 pictures and its macro abilities too.

    like i said looking for advice and comments
    and there have been alot that i appreciate.

    more is welcomed

    I would get the Tamron 17-50 first, then save up for a LX3. The IQ of the LX3 would never be able to compare with a D90. For me, IQ is important, so I'd get the Tamron first.
    A picture tells a thousand words... make yours speak a million!
    My Flickr | My Blog

  17. #17

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Quote Originally Posted by chickenwing View Post
    i like to shoot wide open of bokeh
    Does this statement apply to your 17-55? Cause, if you're not aware, it won't be the same with the LX3 (smaller sensors = shorter focal lengths = greater depth-of-field). The LX3 lens may be f2 - 2.8, but it's also very short focal length, 5.1-12.8mm.

    Other than that, your choice would depend on what's more important to you -- highest image quality/maximum control etc (D90) or weight/convenience/stealth. Personally, I think you're going to miss the 17-55, and will want to get a replacement (I would have kept it in the 1st place, depreciation be damned). Get the LX3 and you're D90 will probably end up staying at home a lot

  18. #18

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Quote Originally Posted by Edwin Francis View Post
    Does this statement apply to your 17-55? Cause, if you're not aware, it won't be the same with the LX3 (smaller sensors = shorter focal lengths = greater depth-of-field). The LX3 lens may be f2 - 2.8, but it's also very short focal length, 5.1-12.8mm.

    Other than that, your choice would depend on what's more important to you -- highest image quality/maximum control etc (D90) or weight/convenience/stealth. Personally, I think you're going to miss the 17-55, and will want to get a replacement (I would have kept it in the 1st place, depreciation be damned). Get the LX3 and you're D90 will probably end up staying at home a lot
    the 17-55 as the only lens i had and i traded it for a 80-200 2.8 two touch, 85 mm 1.8 and 100 bucks

    as i was using the 17-55 i always felt that i was too short for some of my shots, and that i needed to get something closer tats why i got the 80-200 nd the 85mm

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/2399513...7616974967431/

    here are some of my photos i had to crop the F1 ones and some others yeah


    i prefer portraits so is my 85mm going to be enough for will i need the 17-50

    i have used both the 17-50 tamron nd the 17-55 nikon and my eyes can't really tell too much of a difference in quality.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    Quote Originally Posted by chickenwing View Post
    the D90 i bought did no come with a lens just body.

    i like to shoot wide open of bokeh

    wider shots don't really need wide open.
    You can't get a nice bokeh with a PnS

  20. #20

    Default Re: Should i Get a 17-50mm tamron or a Panasonic LX3

    hahahah in the end i got both traded for my 85mm cos i already have the 80-200 hahaha

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •