ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Others

Others All other makes/brands/DIY & misc photographic gadgets discussed here.


 
Thread Tools
Old 16th May 2009   #1
TANJAJ
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17
Default Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Hi everyone,

I'm torn between spending a lot more on a Gitzo, knowing it's quality and perceptible value amongst serious enthusiasts, and saving some coin by buying a Manfrotto.

I'd like to know what some of the differences are, and what features one has or does not have over the other that users might notice or miss.

Cheers in advance for all your help.
TANJAJ is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #2
jnet6
Senior Member
 
jnet6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,253
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Drop by a shop like Cathay photo or TK Foto and try out to feel the difference as it can't be describe by words.
jnet6 is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #3
Nik-enduser
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CCK
Posts: 333
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

yep, save up a bit more and buy the best Gitzo tripod you can afford. It will serve you well for years to come.

I started with Slik, went through several models, including the carbon fibre version. Ended up selling them and finally getting the Gitzos and never looked back. Build quality and user friendliness counts high. Though the Gitzo heads look and peform better nowadays, there are better buys out there. Legs-wise, not many other brands come close (IMHO).
Nik-enduser is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 17th May 2009   #4
AlexK
Member
 
AlexK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 426
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Totally agreed with Nik-enduser. I too went from Slik to Gitzo and never looked back.
AlexK is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #5
jnet6
Senior Member
 
jnet6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,253
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Originally Posted by Nik-enduser View Post
yep, save up a bit more and buy the best Gitzo tripod you can afford. It will serve you well for years to come.

I started with Slik, went through several models, including the carbon fibre version. Ended up selling them and finally getting the Gitzos and never looked back. Build quality and user friendliness counts high. Though the Gitzo heads look and peform better nowadays, there are better buys out there. Legs-wise, not many other brands come close (IMHO).
Same here too, slik alu to manfrotto alu to manfrotto magfiber to gitzo carbon...
oh.... how much has lose over the changing cycle.
jnet6 is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #6
kcuf2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: KFC
Posts: 1,621
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

for tripods, gitzo is the only brand worth considering, all the other brands are junk

however, for tripod heads, u shouldnt waste ur time and hand energy to lift up their heads and try, gitzo heads are junk.

but since u are only looking at legs, ur eyes should ONLY be looking at gitzos, NOTHING else.
__________________
09 Oct 09 officially marks the date I become a canon convert.
kcuf2 is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #7
tSkye
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Farrer Park
Posts: 987
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

+1 to gitzo tripods and arca swiss ballheads

they've worked for a long time without problems and will continue to do so.
__________________
[blog]Whatever comes tSkye's way...
[food]Food, Glorious Food.
tSkye is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #8
COOLBAT2009
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Pay the extra and go Gitzo. I've been using the Gitzo 3541 with a RRS ball head and I have never seconded guessed this decision. The Gitzo is rock solid and mine is 4 segments. The twists locks only take about a 1/4 turn to loosen or tighten. It can also go flat to the ground or in between stops at any angle you want. The legs are tight enough to hold their position anywhere
COOLBAT2009 is offline  
Old 17th May 2009   #9
Zeropoint
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Gitzo ... Yes, best tripod or monopod (carbon 6x with G-lock or better type) in term of the build, quality, etc. This will serve you well for years to come. Forget Gitzo heads, is really cannot make it.
Zeropoint is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #10
YSLee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,262
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Originally Posted by kcuf2 View Post
for tripods, gitzo is the only brand worth considering, all the other brands are junk

however, for tripod heads, u shouldnt waste ur time and hand energy to lift up their heads and try, gitzo heads are junk.

but since u are only looking at legs, ur eyes should ONLY be looking at gitzos, NOTHING else.
What kind of absolute rubbish is that?

I find too many people here blinded by brand snobbery. The main differences you will encounter are in stability and ergonomics. Gitzo's G-Locks are much better now, and can rival flip-locks in speed. The price premium, however, is debatable. That will be up to you to decide.

Remember, a tripod is only as good as your technique, and if it's loaded it within its limits.
YSLee is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #11
Lost Dog
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 421
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

my Benro worked fine with me.
- it's fast for me.
- everything as described by the Gitzo fans... lolz

I wonder why it's not in the choices. Must be only for poor people like me. huhuhu
__________________
Loslos...
Lost Dog is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #12
Lost Dog
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 421
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Originally Posted by kcuf2 View Post
for tripods, gitzo is the only brand worth considering, all the other brands are junk

however, for tripod heads, u shouldnt waste ur time and hand energy to lift up their heads and try, gitzo heads are junk.

but since u are only looking at legs, ur eyes should ONLY be looking at gitzos, NOTHING else.
This statement is way too over rated.. I can't imagine a lot of people not into Gitzo that are using "JUNKS" and still get better pictures.
__________________
Loslos...
Lost Dog is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #13
tSkye
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Farrer Park
Posts: 987
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

I think the reason for gitzo's popularity is its stability.

Try setting up a tripod, press down on the top with your body weight and try to twist it clockwise or counter clockwise.

A gitzo for that matter will remain rigid. Something that's important when taking long exposures in windy conditions.
__________________
[blog]Whatever comes tSkye's way...
[food]Food, Glorious Food.
tSkye is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #14
PrimePhotog
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,259
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Gitzo's build is top notch.better than manfrottos and rock-stable.however,I'm still very happy with my manfrotto cf tripod with an arca-Swiss z1 head.gitzo is terrible at heads and is similar to manfrotto but has a more convenient QR system
__________________
40D + 10-22 and 40D + 70-200 f4L IS
My Flickr
PrimePhotog is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #15
s7709151c
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North-East
Posts: 141
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

I have to give Manfrotto the credit also lah. As initially i got a 190cx and a 488 head, I must say that those manfrotto tripods from italy still are good (High end manfrotto are all italian job). Especially when you losen the joints and extends the legs. the vacuum created also proof that manfrotto is quite precision in their tripod constructions. But the minus point is its without G-lock.
The Gitz that i recently bought are 2531 and 1531. Im addicted and crazy enough to buy these 2. Total a few thousands plus a some investment on Arca B2 and Z1 and a markin M10. My wife is saying that Im crazy. Just bought another mono from Gitz also carbon fibre should be series 2, cant remember the model number, just pay. Im telling you, once the G-locks activates the cam is as firm as a ****. You hit all "G-spot"
s7709151c is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #16
evilorgi
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tampines
Posts: 443
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Originally Posted by s7709151c View Post
I have to give Manfrotto the credit also lah. As initially i got a 190cx and a 488 head, I must say that those manfrotto tripods from italy still are good (High end manfrotto are all italian job). Especially when you losen the joints and extends the legs. the vacuum created also proof that manfrotto is quite precision in their tripod constructions. But the minus point is its without G-lock.
The Gitz that i recently bought are 2531 and 1531. Im addicted and crazy enough to buy these 2. Total a few thousands plus a some investment on Arca B2 and Z1 and a markin M10. My wife is saying that Im crazy. Just bought another mono from Gitz also carbon fibre should be series 2, cant remember the model number, just pay. Im telling you, once the G-locks activates the cam is as firm as a ****. You hit all "G-spot"
lolx... what a way to describe tri/monopods....
__________________
http://evilorgi.multiply.com/
evilorgi is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #17
thenomad
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 292
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

gitzo tripods are regarded to be the best in build quality and stability
if you can afford it, you cannot go wrong with it

however, not everyone wants to spend more to get it, and in some cases neither do they need it
some other brands also work well, not just gitzo, so it boils down to what you need, and how much you are willing to pay for a tripod

with that said, a lot people bought a cheaper tripod, only to find themselves upgrading several times after that
you can save money by buying a good tripod once, rather than a cheaper one several times
thenomad is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #18
KY1977
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 571
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Originally Posted by thenomad View Post
gitzo tripods are regarded to be the best in build quality and stability
if you can afford it, you cannot go wrong with it

however, not everyone wants to spend more to get it, and in some cases neither do they need it
some other brands also work well, not just gitzo, so it boils down to what you need, and how much you are willing to pay for a tripod

with that said, a lot people bought a cheaper tripod, only to find themselves upgrading several times after that
you can save money by buying a good tripod once, rather than a cheaper one several times
I'm happily using my 190XPRO and have not considered upgrading. The good thing about using cheaper ones is that you just concentrate on taking photos. Isn't what the whole thing is about? I dun need to care if there is mud or rocks around. A good saying. If you can't swim dun say your swimming trunks too big. :P
__________________
|CanonEOS|
KY1977 is offline  
Old 19th May 2009   #19
benny
Member
 
benny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 1,712
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Gitzo and Manfrotto are like Lexus and Toyota or Cole Hann and Nike or Intercontinental Hotels and Holiday Inn hotels or Vertu and Nokia. Different brands own by the same companies/groups.

Different brands and products for different segments of the market. If Gitzo works for you, by all means use it. But your picture will be no less impressive with one taken on Manfrotto tripods if you match the right tripod for your gear.

Cheers,
benny is offline  
Old 19th May 2009   #20
PrimePhotog
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,259
Default Re: Gitzo vs. Manfrotto carbon/mag fiber tripods

Totally agree with what Benny said.The tripod brands are in different leagues.How to compare?
__________________
40D + 10-22 and 40D + 70-200 f4L IS
My Flickr
PrimePhotog is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13419 seconds with 7 queries