ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Nikon

Nikon At the heart of the image


 
Thread Tools
Old 14th May 2009   #1
ssdesign
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore | Bishan
Posts: 116
Default Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Hi,
Which one of these 3 is the sharpest and has the best bokeh (i mean perfect circles)?

50mm 1.4 AF-S
50mm 1.8 AF
50mm 1.4 AF

Thanks
__________________
D90 | 50mm f/1.8 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 || flickr || photoblog
ssdesign is offline  
Old 15th May 2009   #2
rain5533
Member
 
rain5533's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 614
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

i have own 50mm 1.4D is best sharpen and bokeh.
but i dunno for the 50mm 1.4G.
u also can search in nikon thread, have alot ppl to comapred it.
rain5533 is offline  
Old 15th May 2009   #3
musicpls
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 110
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

I have the AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D before switching to the current AFS 50mm f/1.4G version. I prefer the new version albeit more expensive.

The new version is a little slower but the focus is spot-on and is dead quiet with SWM motor, while the AFD version has more focus hunt. The G version also has better colour saturation and contrast imo.

Both bokeh are as creamy, maybe i just can't differentiate between them.
__________________
My Web / My Blog
"It's never too late to be who you might have been." - George Eliot
musicpls is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 16th May 2009   #4
agape01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere Out There
Posts: 2,254
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Could it be possible to show some images of the bokeh and the colour rendition that you're talking about?
agape01 is offline  
Old 16th May 2009   #5
aspenx
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 472
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

I only own the AFD 1.8 and have tried the others too. This is my general opinion of the three lenses.

AFD 1.8
- focus: Can be off sometimes. Hunting is very bad.
- compatibility: This is something I consider as I use it on my manual film camera too. With aperture ring, it works but obviously it won't AF on a D40 or D60.
- bokeh: Lousy. What do you expect from something so cheap?
- contrast: Very low wide open, but by f/2.8, it's superb.
- sharpness: Sharp. Nothing to say.

AFD 1.4
- focus: more accurate than the f/1.8 version. Also, the focus ring has some damping and is much nicer to turn than the version above.
- compatibility: Works great on everything, even the D40 and D60 as the manual focus ring is much better. Just use the green dot.
- bokeh: Not bad.
- contrast: Better contrast than the f/1.8 when considering both at wide open. At f/2.8, I don't see any difference.
- sharpness: Actually, all the Nikon 50mm lenses seem to have the same sharpness.

AFS 1.4
- focus: AF is TERRIBLE. I'd rather manual focus on it, but the focus ring doesn't feel as good as the AFD version either.
- compatibility: No aperture ring! Handicapped. Can't use it on the older mechanical cameras. Upside is it will AF on the D40 and D60. A Nikon's first in 50mm prime lenses I must say.
- bokeh: Even better than the AFD version. Also, the 9 blades give a more pleasing effect.
- contrast: Very contrasty even wide open.
- sharpness: Same as AFD version.

I'd get the newest AFS version if not for the lousy focusing and the handicap. IQ wise, it's the best among the three.
__________________
My Flickr. FM2n | D700 | N18-35 | N35/1.4 Ai| VC58/1.4 | N105/2.5 AiS | V135/2.8 macro | N135/2 DC
aspenx is online now  
Old 16th May 2009   #6
agape01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere Out There
Posts: 2,254
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by aspenx View Post
AFS 1.4
- focus: AF is TERRIBLE. I'd rather manual focus on it, but the focus ring doesn't feel as good as the AFD version either.
- compatibility: No aperture ring! Handicapped. Can't use it on the older mechanical cameras. Upside is it will AF on the D40 and D60. A Nikon's first in 50mm prime lenses I must say.
- bokeh: Even better than the AFD version. Also, the 9 blades give a more pleasing effect.
- contrast: Very contrasty even wide open.
- sharpness: Same as AFD version.

I'd get the newest AFS version if not for the lousy focusing and the handicap. IQ wise, it's the best among the three.
Just curious which cam did you try it on?
agape01 is offline  
Old 16th May 2009   #7
aspenx
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 472
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by agape01 View Post
Just curious which cam did you try it on?
D200 for all three. FM2 (film) for the first two.
__________________
My Flickr. FM2n | D700 | N18-35 | N35/1.4 Ai| VC58/1.4 | N105/2.5 AiS | V135/2.8 macro | N135/2 DC
aspenx is online now  
Old 18th May 2009   #8
Nenjia
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,404
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

important thing i like the AFD is the distance scale -- it allows hyper focusing -- G is not possible
Nenjia is offline  
Old 18th May 2009   #9
rain5533
Member
 
rain5533's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 614
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

my recently photo is taken from 50mm 1.4D.

rain5533 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009   #10
lamergod
Member
 
lamergod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shunfu
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

tried my hands on a 50mm f1.4 D from a friend and used it on my D40.Actually MF is okay with me.I gotta say the bokeh is amazing compared to my other lenses(18-55 55-200.I know cannot fight).The lens is super sharp.The ergonomics is good.Getting it although it cant af with my cam
__________________
Under Construction
lamergod is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #11
chris667198
Member
 
chris667198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 222
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

If you like MF len, you may want to try Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 SL II
__________________
My Flickr

Last edited by chris667198; 22nd May 2009 at 07:36 PM.
chris667198 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009   #12
lamergod
Member
 
lamergod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shunfu
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by chris667198 View Post
If you like MF len, you may want to try Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 SL II
Im not into MF although i still prefer AF.But if there is a cheap alternative of a MF lens that is as sharp as a expensive AF lens i will consider it
__________________
Under Construction
lamergod is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #13
Omega23
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 334
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

If you dun mind third party, sigma 50mm f1.4 hsm is the best.
Omega23 is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #14
aspenx
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 472
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by lamergod View Post
Im not into MF although i still prefer AF.But if there is a cheap alternative of a MF lens that is as sharp as a expensive AF lens i will consider it
You can't usually have the best of both worlds.

Sharpness-wise, what makes you think expensive AF lenses will be shaper? They are usually more expensive because of the AF. It has little to do with sharpness, IQ or contrast. You are thinking of getting an AF lens that wouldn't AF on your camera for the same price as a MF lens that would definitely feel better and would also likely produce better images?

I suggest you stick to the 50mm f/1.8 AFD.
__________________
My Flickr. FM2n | D700 | N18-35 | N35/1.4 Ai| VC58/1.4 | N105/2.5 AiS | V135/2.8 macro | N135/2 DC
aspenx is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #15
lamergod
Member
 
lamergod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shunfu
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by aspenx View Post
You can't usually have the best of both worlds.

Sharpness-wise, what makes you think expensive AF lenses will be shaper? They are usually more expensive because of the AF. It has little to do with sharpness, IQ or contrast. You are thinking of getting an AF lens that wouldn't AF on your camera for the same price as a MF lens that would definitely feel better and would also likely produce better images?

I suggest you stick to the 50mm f/1.8 AFD.
Its not the AF/MF that makes me feel that way
__________________
Under Construction
lamergod is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #16
aspenx
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 472
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by lamergod View Post
Its not the AF/MF that makes me feel that way
Anyways, I have a D40 too and realised that no decent Nikon primes are both affordable AND will AF on it. I prefer to use manual focus lenses on it. You won't know the feel of it until you try it, really. And if you're not going to upgrade your camera soon, it'd make much more sense to get a manual focus lens the way i see it.
__________________
My Flickr. FM2n | D700 | N18-35 | N35/1.4 Ai| VC58/1.4 | N105/2.5 AiS | V135/2.8 macro | N135/2 DC
aspenx is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #17
lamergod
Member
 
lamergod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shunfu
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by aspenx View Post
Anyways, I have a D40 too and realised that no decent Nikon primes are both affordable AND will AF on it. I prefer to use manual focus lenses on it. You won't know the feel of it until you try it, really. And if you're not going to upgrade your camera soon, it'd make much more sense to get a manual focus lens the way i see it.
Not upgrading my DSLR but might get a SLR
__________________
Under Construction
lamergod is online now  
Old 22nd May 2009   #18
chris667198
Member
 
chris667198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 222
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Originally Posted by lamergod View Post
Not upgrading my DSLR but might get a SLR
Stick to AF 50mm 1.8 then....Cheap and good.
__________________
My Flickr

Last edited by chris667198; 22nd May 2009 at 11:07 PM.
chris667198 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009   #19
Andrew Hoi
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 175
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

If you like to shoot wide open @ 1.4 , the new G wins hands down in terms of sharpness. Bokeh is hard to tell the diff from the old 1.4D at least to me.

Last edited by Andrew Hoi; 22nd May 2009 at 11:14 PM.
Andrew Hoi is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009   #20
Numnumball
Member
 
Numnumball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central (Zion Rd)
Posts: 1,811
Default Re: Nikkor 50mm: AF-S 1.4 v/s AF 1.8 v/s AF 1.4

Save ur $$ for other stuff.
50mm 1.8D will suffice.
Don't really see the difference in mechanical and optical quality
Even if it call for the need to shoot in low light condition, i rather crank up my ISO then to pay a few hundred more for the extra 1 stop.

But thats only just my $0.02 worth

Cheers
__________________
D700/D5K|MBD10|N17-35f2.8|N24-70f2.8|N70-200f2.8|N105f2.8VR|SB900|SBR1
My Flickr
Numnumball is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13130 seconds with 7 queries