Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

  1. #1

    Smile Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    In Sunday times, salma khalik reported that William Tan , the paraplegic adventurer is battling leukaemia. that report with a photo took one quarter of a page's space. however, in monday's s.t., william wrote in forum that he does not have leukaemia and asked for an apology. Following his letter, this appeared, "Editor's note: We apologize to Dr. Tan and his family for the error." It seems inadequate. how could a veteran reporter make such a blalant mistake?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    well ... it could be a genuine mistake ...
    or it could be a case where the person involved (a prominent figure) does not want it to be publicised ...

    So which is which ....

    Which ever the case ... i don't think ST will make a big fuss about an apology. It is already difficult enough to make them do an apology ... you think they would do it in big bold prints ...
    Touch the Moments ... Hold the colours of Joy

  3. #3
    Senior Member redstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Beyond the outer limits
    Posts
    2,898

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    They should put a full page apology instead of a one liner.

  4. #4
    vince123123
    Guests

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    It may be defamation to say someone has leukemia when he does not.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    For such a serious news, why didn't the reporter asked the good doctor to confirm?
    If the doctor did not comment, then ST should not publish.

    I remembered what former ST Lesile Fong said about their journalists:
    Whether in writing news stories or features, properly trained
    journalists check and double-check their facts
    , set these
    in context, work in relevant background information, insist on
    objectivity and balance, organise their material so their
    account flows smoothly and logically, and use temperate
    language unless there is a powerful reason to resort to strong
    words. Even in offering views, they ensure that the opinions
    expressed are based on fact, failing which, as any libel lawyer
    would tell you, what they write cannot be defended as fair
    comment.
    Link

    I hope that Mr Fong would give the current editors some lessons.

    Senior editors cannot be that "relaxed" nowadays, right?
    Last edited by jasonlcs; 12th May 2009 at 09:35 PM.
    [ Flickr ]

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    250

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    I remember back then when a prominent ex-politician was reported of being involved in a hit-and-run. Turned out to be same name different guy. ST ran two days of full page apologies in all their papers (ST,BH, NP etc.).

  7. #7

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    Quote Originally Posted by weevil84 View Post
    I remember back then when a prominent ex-politician was reported of being involved in a hit-and-run. Turned out to be same name different guy. ST ran two days of full page apologies in all their papers (ST,BH, NP etc.).
    I remember this too. On the front page of New Paper.
    My first impression was, how can that ex-politician be driving a van around?
    Last edited by foxwagon; 13th May 2009 at 12:20 PM.

  8. #8

    Smile Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    who ?

  9. #9

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    "33 YEAR OLD SALESMAN TOH CHIN CHYE HAS BEEN CHARGED
    WITH CAUSING A HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT, RESULTING IN THE
    DEATH OF A TEENAGER. TOHS BELIEVED TO HAVE COMMITTED
    THE OFFENCE WHILE DRIVING HIS VAN ALONG THE ECP LAST
    JUNE.

    HE'S ALLEGED TO HAVE COLLIDED WITH 17-YEAR-OLD MOSES
    SEOW CHEE SIANG WHO WAS STANDING BEHIND A MOTORCYCLE
    PARKED ON THE ROAD SHOULDER. HIS CASE WILL BE HEARD AGAIN
    ON 26 MARCH AND HE'S BEEN OFFERED BAIL OF 20 THOUSAND
    DOLLARS.

    TOH'S CASE WAS RECENTLY IN THE NEWS AS THE ACCUSED SHARES
    THE SAME NAME AS SINGAPORE'S EX-DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER,
    DR TOH CHIN CHYE
    .

    THE NEW PAPER HAS SINCE APOLOGISED TO DR TOH
    FOR THE GRAVE ERROR AND HAS SAID THAT IT WOULD PAY
    DAMAGES."

    LINK

    Quote Originally Posted by reachme2003 View Post
    who ?
    [ Flickr ]

  10. #10

    Smile Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    when did this accident happen? it is unforgiving to see the elder toh chin chye as a 33 yo. tks anyway.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    LOL, it's that rag known as "The New Paper".

    'Nuff said.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    Well, it's a case of an Ex-DPM & a commoner.

    I briefly remembered that news & that editor then was most careless.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    250

    Default Re: Was Straits Times' apology given sufficient prominence?

    Said editors involved in the news were either demoted during that time or have left TNP. Dr Toh wanted to pursue legal action but matter was settled out of court. Not sure if Dr Tan would pursue legal action and whether it would have resulted in a different reaction from the papers can only be speculated. However, coming back to the topic, I too agree that a one-liner is most inadequate. Can anyone, though, confirm that no other form of apology was made with regards to this issue?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •