![]() |
|
|||||||
| Macros and Close-ups The small world brought large. Photos of tiny things, from critters to exotic items. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 710
|
Day 1 shooting macro - wrong attire kenna bitten by mossie until jialat jialat
Just got my Raynox 250. Wish it worked on my tamron too but the filter size is too big to use. anyway here are some shots from a noob @ macro 1) 2) 3) 4) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ~Sunny Little Island~
Posts: 1,266
|
Hmm... You need to control your flash so that the lightings are not so harsh. Shots seems overexposed to me. Otherwise, pictures are pretty sharp to me
.Any PP done? If not, you may want to give it a try. Good try! |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
I think it is overexposed due to the harsh flash. You lose details this way. Some focus issues too. composition could be better.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 604
|
Hi WildSoyaBean, care to share your settings and setup so we would be in a better position to give you some constructive comments.
__________________
My Flickr Canon 40D 18-55/50mm F1.8/100mm Macro F2.8 USM |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 710
|
thanks for the comment.
its direct flash...didnt bring my sb800 shot with 50mm f16 with raynox 250. should i use tripod for such shoots. yea i find it quite hard to focus. the depth of view of marco is really shallow! i didnt do much pp...just crop |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member/Tangshooter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 573
|
most of us here use direct flash but we put a DIY diffuser (made from Meiji milk bottle or $2 transparent chopping board from Daiso) in front - this will help diffuse the light evenly....
__________________
D300 | Flickr |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 710
|
![]() got sample to show me how u attach it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ~Sunny Little Island~
Posts: 1,266
|
For me, I have to attach to the lens before attaching the lens to the body
. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 251
|
looks underexposed for ur spidey. use diffused flash for better results
__________________
Talk Less, Shoot More http://www.flickr.com/photos/hisokaka/ |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ~Sunny Little Island~
Posts: 1,266
|
First of all, your shots have improved
!JS shots are preferred to be facing the camera directly so that we do not have to tilt our heads . In this case, you can flip your last shot 90 degrees anti-clockwise for the result.Try to move closer to the subject to reveal more details of the JS. #2 is under-exposed. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Equator
Posts: 754
|
you did not use the flash for the spider shots? they look a bit dark?
can you control flash-fill with your camera? i mean, like instead of firing at FULL, can you actually set it 1/2 or 1/4 or 1/8 filled? such settings are useful to control the amount of light going to the insect. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 710
|
haha i use my sb800....its looks okie on lcd screen...but not sure it turns out this way.
perhaps should have used spot metering instead of matrix since the surronding are white colour stuff, hence the camera under-exposed the spider? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|