Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: How sharp is sharp?

  1. #1

    Default How sharp is sharp?

    I downloaded the images I shot with my digital cam and was pleased with most of the images. But the horror comes when I zoom in on them!!! I realize they are not so sharp afterall -- blurred like out-of-focus if not due to camera shake.

    So how sharp is sharp? Does it mean to capture a good image, if I enlarge it I should still see a reasonable amount of details? (I'm not referring to the images becoming pixelated. This is expected if one goes beyond a certain limit...)

  2. #2

    Default

    The images you view on the LCD screen are very misleading. One way is to zoom in when you are at preview mode of your camera. This is one way to check when the subject is in focus or not.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Sharpness should be self-explanatory really. Something's either sharp or it's not. Below is an example of what a sharp shot should look like:


    The full frame view.


    A cropped portion of the shot. If you are looking at this on a 72dpi monitor, then the effective enlargement size is 28"x42". No unsharp mask has been applied, so the shot could appear to be sharper. This is the kind of detail that you can pull out of a shot with good focusing and technique.

  4. #4

    Default

    To continue the example I will post crops of raw images. No processing whatsoever. I've posted the original resized images in the World of Nature forum earlier




    Coolscan IV scan. Using a teleconverter
    somewhere in world of nature...


    Coolscan IV. No teleconverter. (my Crowned Pigeon shot)
    http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...&threadid=4872



    Nikon Coolpix 995 JPEG fine
    http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...&threadid=4761


    p.s. testing homex.coolconnect webspace. hope the bandwidth is ok.
    Last edited by erwinx; 15th April 2002 at 10:58 AM.

  5. #5
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  6. #6

    Default Re: How sharp is sharp?

    Originally posted by David
    I downloaded the images I shot with my digital cam and was pleased with most of the images. But the horror comes when I zoom in on them!!! I realize they are not so sharp afterall -- blurred like out-of-focus if not due to camera shake.

    So how sharp is sharp? Does it mean to capture a good image, if I enlarge it I should still see a reasonable amount of details? (I'm not referring to the images becoming pixelated. This is expected if one goes beyond a certain limit...)
    What cam are you using? If you have a cam which can shoot in RAW format, like a G2, you should try it. It yields sharper, finer-detailed, unpixellated images especially when blown up big.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,292

    Default Re: Re: How sharp is sharp?

    Originally posted by rumraisin


    What cam are you using? If you have a cam which can shoot in RAW format, like a G2, you should try it. It yields sharper, finer-detailed, unpixellated images especially when blown up big.
    Your reply is a little misleading, shooting raw does not gives you sharper images. Raw only gives you the ability and more flexibility to carry out post processing of your images.

    Like what Jed said, good focusing and techniques are important.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Re: Re: How sharp is sharp?

    Originally posted by Goondu


    Your reply is a little misleading, shooting raw does not gives you sharper images. Raw only gives you the ability and more flexibility to carry out post processing of your images.

    Like what Jed said, good focusing and techniques are important.
    But I experimented and it seems that all other things being equal, the RAW image is clearer and more real. Isn't something lost in the translation to Jpeg?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,292

    Default Re: Re: Re: Re: How sharp is sharp?

    Originally posted by rumraisin


    But I experimented and it seems that all other things being equal, the RAW image is clearer and more real. Isn't something lost in the translation to Jpeg?
    You need to convert to either Jpeg or Tiff since you cannot see RAW image in the first place. Yes, I do agree that the camera in-processing is not as good as some of the commercial software available. This may lead to some loss of quality.

    However, this loss may not be significant to render the picture as not sharp.

    For your information, I have shot both Jpeg and RAW modes before and some of the Jpegs are even better than those shot in RAW and doing the conversion via software.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,292

    Default

    Sorry, for more information, please refer to the following thread:

    http://www.dpreview.com/learn/Glossa..._Format_01.htm

    Hope that helps.

  11. #11

    Default

    How do you guys maginify one part of the pic in photoshop? Can't seem to do that. My way was to crop and then image size. Wondering if there's another way?

    Oh btw, that cat... so similar to my favourite cat out of my 7 cats... Except it has a black lip hehe and black eyerings.

    Paws are black, grey and black stripes... damn.. wish I could take a shot of it...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •