![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North
Posts: 147
|
Need some help.....
Thinking of getting Nikon D300. Is having the Nikkor 12-24, VR 18-200 and 35mm/1.8G a good collection? Usage is potrait shots, lanscpe and everyday use... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,513
|
Good is subjective...
While the 18-200 would be convenient for everyday use, image quality will suffer a bit...if that does not bother you then its fine...of course if u dun wan to be lugging around heavy equipment, 18-200 is the perfect everyday use lens... For portrait, depends on yr style, for 35mm it may or may not be suitable... Majority of the ppl use 85mm for portraits....or at least 50mm under a cropped sensor... 12-24 makes a fine landscape lens thats for sure....
__________________
D300(w grip) N14-24 N17-55 N70-200 N1.7X TC N10.5 FE SB-900 ~See me thru my eyes~ |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 138
|
For DX format, how about considering Tokina 11-16mm for landscape.
__________________
Nikon D90 | 18-200mm VR | 50mm f1.8| Tokina 11-16mm f2.8|Sigma 30mm f1.4 |SB900 Sony W300 |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Clementi Ave 3
Posts: 255
|
2nd the tokina. its a miracle.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where the action is
Posts: 1,290
|
Landscape - Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 Everyday use - Nikkor 16-85mm VR or Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 Any other answers?
__________________
In search of excellence in photography. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 757
|
No horse run...D300 + 17-55 mm F2.8.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 127
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central (Zion Rd)
Posts: 1,811
|
On a DX Body?
Portrait : 35 f1.8 or 50 f1.4D Landscape : tokina 11-16 2.8 or Nikon 12-24 f4 General purpose : 24-70 f2.8 (gives u 36-105 becos of 1.5 DX cropping factor *wonderful lens*) However If tight on budget, a 18-200 is good. Just my $0.02 worth Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,286
|
I believe I have the same interest as you, and my setup is as follows:
1. Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM 2. Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] 3. Nikon AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED So if you want an all-Nikon setup, I suggest: 1. Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED 2. (I have a few suggestions for the dedicated portrait lens) a. Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED b. Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G c. Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8D 3. AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED I've used the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 and wasn't too impressed with it. I prefer the 50mm f/1.4. But it's a personal choice. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 45
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North
Posts: 147
|
D700 and fell in love with it. Make a jump for it with 24-70mm f2.8 ED(2.9x). ![]() But still think D300 is a decent option for those interested. Last edited by RezzShaz; 10th May 2009 at 11:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,286
|
I did notice quite distinctive CA though. Curious, for a prime. This occurs even at smaller apertures, such as f/5.6. The AF isn't great, but hey, if the model can stay still for a couple of seconds, the AF will work fine. Perhaps it was a simple case of "photographer inadequacy", but I guess I wasn't used to the 35mm. I'm not keen to use this lens for portraiture work. (Do forgive me if I am too critical against the lens; I was spoilt by the Nikon 200mm f/2 and 85mm f/1.4 just before I played with the 35mm f/1.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North
Posts: 147
|
Ha Ha Buy already
Set me back quite a bit bro.... |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 45
|
Nice. I'm looking at a slightly different setup as I'm more for landscapes, macro, and some portraits.
Here's the setup i'm planning to get: D300 Body AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR (5.3x) for general usage and a Sigma 70-200mm f2.8D EX APO HSM for zoom Is this setup any good? |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,678
|
This combination is dangerous.....warning to those not prepared (wallet)....better don't try or you will loose sleep every night ![]()
__________________
Takuya Kimura has chosen Nikon. When will you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where the action is
Posts: 1,290
|
Whoa you are really very decisive. I think you had made the right choice. For your shooting interests, you should also consider the Nikkor 14-24mm and the Nikkor 85mm f/1.4. But, for now the 24-70mm should suffice. BBB....
__________________
In search of excellence in photography. Last edited by TheChef; 11th May 2009 at 02:29 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|