ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Others

Others All other makes/brands/DIY & misc photographic gadgets discussed here.


View Poll Results: Which Ballhead is better for RRS L plate?
Arca Swiss Z1 7 46.67%
BH-55 Pro (Full-sized ballhead with Pro) 1 6.67%
Markins Q-Ball M20 7 46.67%
Others (please specify make and model) 0 0%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

 
Thread Tools
Old 8th May 2009   #1
MachIII
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West
Posts: 112
Default Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

Hi all,

I am trying to get a arca swiss standard ballhead to fit RRS L plate for 5D MKII. I am need experts to advice on my shortlisted candidates.
L plate from RRS for 5D MKII


1) Arca Swiss Z1
Cost: Approx USD$ 389.95


Arca Swiss Z1 Ballhead Review

Some bad news about Z1. I am not sure whether CP has such stock.
[url=http://www.tripodhead.com/Arca%20Swiss%20stem%20issue%20warning_for%20web%20 080527%20(final%20edit).pdf[/url]

2) BH-55 Pro (Full-sized ballhead with Pro)
Cost: Approx USD$ 415.00


Really Right Stuff BH-55 Ballhead


3) Markins Q-Ball M20
Cost: Approx USD$ 390


Markins Q-Ball M20 Ballhead


4) Others (Please specifiy make and model)

What will be your pick or any other recommendation that can fit RRS L plate as it looks the best what i can find?

Can the plate offered by the three manufacturers fit 5D MKII?

Are there any retails that sell all three ballheads?

Thanks a lot.
MachIII is online now  
Old 8th May 2009   #2
Headshotzx
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Punggol
Posts: 3,986
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

Hi, what lenses do you have?

I have personally tested the Markins Q3 and M10 before at John3:16 and found it to be very very smooth and easy to use. The friction control knob is easy to turn, and getting the sweet spot is very easy. I would think that an M10 would be more than enough for a standard 5D2 + medium sized lens (70-200 or 300). The weight rating is very good. Buy the M20 if you have longer lenses AND still want a ballhead (longer lenses are easier to use on a wimberley head, or on a tilt head on a monopod).

You might want to get the M10, and since you're gonna use the RRS L plate, get the RRS Lever QR plate that allows for faster mounting and dismounting compared to the knob types.

Cheers,
Zexun
__________________
Our pictures are our footprints. It’s the best way to tell people we were here - JoeMcnally | Flickr
Headshotzx is online now  
Old 9th May 2009   #3
kitkai
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 166
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

I don't know about you, but I cannot justify buying a head that is more expensive than the tripod, and I'm targeting Gitzo GT1531...
__________________
Photography Eqpt: Nikon D90 | AFS 24-70 F2.8 | SB800
Technical Blog
kitkai is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 9th May 2009   #4
Hacker
Senior Member
 
Hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 3,028
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

Definitely the Arcaswiss or the RRS ballhead. The Z1 is very well made, and I'm onto my second one (with the Pano). Tried the RRS ballheads too, friends ordered both the 40 and the 55, both extremely well made.
Hacker is online now  
Old 9th May 2009   #5
Randius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,740
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

Even though I own a Markins, if I have enough money, I will go for the RRS BH-40
__________________
a photoGRaph a Day
Randius is offline  
Old 9th May 2009   #6
YSLee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,262
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

Personally I find the Markins close to the Z1. While there's a distinct difference it's not as big as say, the difference between the Z1 and the Kangrinpoche heads.

I decided on the Markins as it was cheaper, and the 4 to 6 reports I've read of those who had both a Markins and the RRS head claim that there is more droop from the RRS on locking. Given the price difference, it wasn't something I was willing to take a bet on.
YSLee is offline  
Old 11th May 2009   #7
MachIII
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West
Posts: 112
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

It seems that Araca Swiss and Markins have a tie.

However, in one of my link above, i discovered that the 2nd batch of Arca Swiss Z1 has manufacturer defects which can result in the release between the ball core and the head. I am wondering any one can share this?

Thanks a lot.
MachIII is online now  
Old 19th May 2009   #8
PrimePhotog
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

If I remember correctly, some guy at B&H told me the problem with the Z1 only affected some batches.The newer ones like mine work perfectly
__________________
40D + 10-22 and 40D + 70-200 f4L IS
My Flickr
PrimePhotog is offline  
Old 7th August 2009   #9
busywin
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3
Default Re: Which of the Pricey Ballheads?

you can try FLM TILT ballhead, good qaulity and performce very well. having panorama function.now I get two ballheads that having tilting function. one is FLM CB-58FT,one is SUNWAY PHOTO DBH-52.
FLM CB-58FT weight about 800g
SUNWAY DBH-52. weight 820g

both of them are very expensive, but perform very well

Last edited by busywin; 15th September 2009 at 09:15 AM. Reason: image
busywin is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08795 seconds with 8 queries