![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In God's Top Ten
Posts: 2,249
|
as some of you may know, i actually offloaded my entire dslr setup a short while back and moved into shooting film. no regrets though.
![]() but facing a wee bit of a dilemma now as some of my work do require colour, the very saturated sort. the easy answer is of course to shoot E6... but there is no lab here where I am that processes it. Any recommendations for a super saturated C41 that can give as close a result as Velvia? Or should I just break the piggy bank and pick up a DRF... ![]() Would be happy to hear your input
__________________
my PBase(new) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Simei
Posts: 305
|
shoot Kodak portra with a contrasty lens then!
![]()
__________________
Ryanleica.tumblr.com | M8 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 742
|
Where are you at? Photohub processes E6.
Or use normal negs & do some PP after scanning them? |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In God's Top Ten
Posts: 2,249
|
Portra. Hmmm. Will get a roll to try when I come back to sg this weekend.
Alternative is to be patient. Haha... wait 2-3 months each time after shooting then process them the next time I come back. Royale: based in Indonesia at the moment... for another year more or so. The reason why I'm asking is I don't quite like the result from adding saturation to my negative scans. It's fine for web viewing though. But it starts to have artifacts show up on large(r) prints....
__________________
my PBase(new) Last edited by Yatlapball; 30th April 2009 at 01:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Simei
Posts: 305
|
Yea Portra 400VC, not NC
__________________
Ryanleica.tumblr.com | M8 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 360
|
The bloody wild Ektar 100! With red so wild you will get a heart attack.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 1,270
|
in any case, portra vc will not give anything near slide colors.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In God's Top Ten
Posts: 2,249
|
Its Ektar... and not Ekta... I was initially confused too, until I googled.
I guess the marketing folks at Kodak wanted to hint at its "closeness" to E6 in terms of colours and saturation. Thus a very similar name. Ektar. Ektachrome. ![]()
__________________
my PBase(new) |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|