ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 26th April 2009   #1
eugene7788
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
Default Flashes for baby

Hi, i have a question.

If it safe to take pictures for baby using strobes flashes?

Thanks.
eugene7788 is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #2
alexyap1205
Member
 
alexyap1205's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 124
Smile Re: Flashes for baby

I personally would not want to do that. But, I heard somebody saying it is not bad as long as it is not direct, maybe you could bounce it to the ceiling or something.
__________________
M Y S I G N A T U R E :)
alexyap1205 is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #3
Legoz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by alexyap1205 View Post
I personally would not want to do that. But, I heard somebody saying it is not bad as long as it is not direct, maybe you could bounce it to the ceiling or something.
Can i just check... why would it be bad?

Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8
Legoz is online now  
Sponsored Link
Old 26th April 2009   #4
GavinTing
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,276
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by Legoz View Post
Can i just check... why would it be bad?

Regards
Babies have sensitive eyes and random, sudden bright flashes of light might cause blindness?
__________________
Moooooo!
GavinTing is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #5
Legoz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by GavinTing View Post
Babies have sensitive eyes and random, sudden bright flashes of light might cause blindness?
And their eyes gets less sensitive as they grow up? When would be a good time to start using flash on babies / kids?

Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8

Last edited by Legoz; 26th April 2009 at 07:27 PM.
Legoz is online now  
Old 26th April 2009   #6
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,757
Default Re: Flashes for baby

just goolge "camera flash", "harm", "baby" will find many answers on this topic.

anyway, just see this video and tell me what you think.


the studio flash she uses, is many many time powerful than yours.
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #7
Legoz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by Legoz View Post
And their eyes gets less sensitive as they grow up? When would be a good time to start using flash on babies / kids?

Regards
im sure TS found his answer and this thread can close liao.
Theres just too many myths around.. heresay's' are definately bad.

Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8
Legoz is online now  
Old 26th April 2009   #8
eugene7788
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Thank you so much for all the answers.

I think i have better knowledge.

Thanks again.
eugene7788 is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #9
zac08
Senior Member
 
zac08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,953
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Babies eyes are not as developed as adults and they are not able to protect themselves from the bright flashes (esp direct lighting)

The Anne Geddes pics mainly depict the baby already sleeping and are diffused.

I personally would not use flash on a baby under 12 months.
__________________
Michael Lim
My Flickr Site APAD 2009
zac08 is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #10
Dream Merchant
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,121
Default Re: Flashes for baby

It all depends on HOW you use the flash.

Just saying 'diffused' is not enough (not referring to anyone in particular ) as many would think it's OK to slap on an omnobounce or GFLS or a whaletail or a Demb and just blast away with a 50mm from close range ... which I'm not surprised is exactly what a lot of folks do!

If it was that bad, countless studios and photographers would be guilty of blinding countless human beings for life! And probably be bakrupt from all the lawsuits.
Dream Merchant is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #11
gollum
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
Default Re: Flashes for baby

for babies, even if its not proven to be bad for the baby etc, shouldn't we err on the side of caution.
gollum is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #12
zac08
Senior Member
 
zac08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,953
Default Re: Flashes for baby

One additional thing to note...

we're largely getting shortsighted... Could the prevalance of camera gear be part of the cause?
__________________
Michael Lim
My Flickr Site APAD 2009
zac08 is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #13
gollum
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by zac08 View Post
One additional thing to note...

we're largely getting shortsighted... Could the prevalance of camera gear be part of the cause?
yea was thinking of that...10 years ago, during film, there are less shots taken as compared to now..

there really seem to be more young kids wearing glasses nowadays
gollum is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #14
chalib
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,436
Default Re: Flashes for baby

TV and computer monitor is the culprit.....
chalib is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #15
Dream Merchant
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,121
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
just goolge "camera flash", "harm", "baby" will find many answers on this topic.

anyway, just see this video and tell me what you think.


the studio flash she uses, is many many time powerful than yours.
LOL!

Can never miss the grotty carpeting of Vegas conventional halls!
Dream Merchant is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #16
Legoz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by Dream Merchant View Post
It all depends on HOW you use the flash.

Just saying 'diffused' is not enough (not referring to anyone in particular ) as many would think it's OK to slap on an omnobounce or GFLS or a whaletail or a Demb and just blast away with a 50mm from close range ... which I'm not surprised is exactly what a lot of folks do!

If it was that bad, countless studios and photographers would be guilty of blinding countless human beings for life! And probably be bakrupt from all the lawsuits.
i agree.
Flashes are not harmful to babies' eyes. The myth about not using flashes most prob stems from some over-protective parents.

In reality, if used appropriately, most of us would get the pics and not do any harm in any way to the kids/babies at all.

Saying that the flash can blind is akin to a DSLR can kill a baby if dropped on him/her. then use PnS???

Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8
Legoz is online now  
Old 27th April 2009   #17
Dream Merchant
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,121
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Well, I wouldn't risk a 1D or D3 with a 70/80-200 2.8 dropped from any height onto a baby!


Anyways ... as in any area in life, you get all sorts fallacies and beliefs at work.
Dream Merchant is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #18
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,757
Default Re: Flashes for baby

Originally Posted by zac08 View Post
One additional thing to note...

we're largely getting shortsighted... Could the prevalance of camera gear be part of the cause?
Nope, don't think so
Originally Posted by gollum View Post
yea was thinking of that...10 years ago, during film, there are less shots taken as compared to now..

there really seem to be more young kids wearing glasses nowadays
Nope. camera is not the cause..
Originally Posted by chalib View Post
TV and computer monitor is the culprit.....
yes,

not every family have cameras, but almost each family with kids have two to three TV and computer nowadays, can you guys tell me how many hours we facing TV, computer screen each day? at school, at work, at home, at shopping centers, at food courts, on the streets?

btw, myopia can be inheritable.
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #19
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,757
Default Re: Flashes for baby

if you use a flash bounce at ceiling to take photos of baby, let said the duration of the burst of flash is at 1/25000 sec, you can took 5 shots and get the photos you want.

but if someone tell you flash will harm the baby, so you move your baby near the windows to get better lights, and you can have a handheld shutter speed of 1/125 sec, f5.6, but you need to spend 15mins there.

in term of the intensity of light falls on baby, can you tell me which is stronger and more irritating?
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 27th April 2009   #20
diiva
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
Default Re: Flashes for baby

I had a newborn 3 months ago and I had not used flash on him until recently (and it was by accident when I forgot to select no flash for my p&s camera).

Now I only use flash when he is not looking in that direction. eg when he is laying down then I dun use ceiling bounce flash, etc...
diiva is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.14057 seconds with 7 queries