![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
|
Hi, i have a question.
If it safe to take pictures for baby using strobes flashes? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 124
|
I personally would not want to do that. But, I heard somebody saying it is not bad as long as it is not direct, maybe you could bounce it to the ceiling or something.
![]()
__________________
M Y S I G N A T U R E :) |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
|
Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,276
|
Babies have sensitive eyes and random, sudden bright flashes of light might cause blindness?
__________________
Moooooo! |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
|
Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8 Last edited by Legoz; 26th April 2009 at 07:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,757
|
just goolge "camera flash", "harm", "baby" will find many answers on this topic.
anyway, just see this video and tell me what you think. the studio flash she uses, is many many time powerful than yours. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
|
Theres just too many myths around.. heresay's' are definately bad. ![]() Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
|
Thank you so much for all the answers.
I think i have better knowledge. Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,953
|
Babies eyes are not as developed as adults and they are not able to protect themselves from the bright flashes (esp direct lighting)
The Anne Geddes pics mainly depict the baby already sleeping and are diffused. I personally would not use flash on a baby under 12 months. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,121
|
It all depends on HOW you use the flash.
Just saying 'diffused' is not enough (not referring to anyone in particular ) as many would think it's OK to slap on an omnobounce or GFLS or a whaletail or a Demb and just blast away with a 50mm from close range ... which I'm not surprised is exactly what a lot of folks do!If it was that bad, countless studios and photographers would be guilty of blinding countless human beings for life! And probably be bakrupt from all the lawsuits. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
|
for babies, even if its not proven to be bad for the baby etc, shouldn't we err on the side of caution.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,953
|
One additional thing to note...
we're largely getting shortsighted... Could the prevalance of camera gear be part of the cause? |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
|
there really seem to be more young kids wearing glasses nowadays |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,436
|
TV and computer monitor is the culprit.....
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,121
|
Can never miss the grotty carpeting of Vegas conventional halls! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 789
|
Flashes are not harmful to babies' eyes. The myth about not using flashes most prob stems from some over-protective parents. In reality, if used appropriately, most of us would get the pics and not do any harm in any way to the kids/babies at all. Saying that the flash can blind is akin to a DSLR can kill a baby if dropped on him/her. then use PnS??? Regards
__________________
D3s / D3x / 18-55 f3.5 - 5.6 / 55-200 f3.5-5.6 / 50 f1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,121
|
Well, I wouldn't risk a 1D or D3 with a 70/80-200 2.8 dropped from any height onto a baby!
![]() Anyways ... as in any area in life, you get all sorts fallacies and beliefs at work. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,757
|
yes, not every family have cameras, but almost each family with kids have two to three TV and computer nowadays, can you guys tell me how many hours we facing TV, computer screen each day? at school, at work, at home, at shopping centers, at food courts, on the streets? btw, myopia can be inheritable. |
||
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,757
|
if you use a flash bounce at ceiling to take photos of baby, let said the duration of the burst of flash is at 1/25000 sec, you can took 5 shots and get the photos you want.
but if someone tell you flash will harm the baby, so you move your baby near the windows to get better lights, and you can have a handheld shutter speed of 1/125 sec, f5.6, but you need to spend 15mins there. in term of the intensity of light falls on baby, can you tell me which is stronger and more irritating? |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 72
|
I had a newborn 3 months ago and I had not used flash on him until recently (and it was by accident when I forgot to select no flash for my p&s camera).
Now I only use flash when he is not looking in that direction. eg when he is laying down then I dun use ceiling bounce flash, etc... |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|