ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Nikon

Nikon At the heart of the image


 
Thread Tools
Old 15th November 2003   #21
jo3pit
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 406
Talking

Originally Posted by Andy Ho
It is a full frame fish eye to replace the 16mm for use on Nikon DX digital cameras so that you get a full fish eye effect.

Andy Ho

gee, it's making me more excited...
jo3pit is offline  
Old 15th November 2003   #22
scanman
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Red White and stars.
Posts: 337
Default

Hi

What happen when u fix the 10.5 DX lens on normal SLR?
wat the effect?
scanman is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #23
Andy Ho
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Punggol
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by scanman
Hi

What happen when u fix the 10.5 DX lens on normal SLR?
wat the effect?
You get vignetting on your pictures (circular shadows on the edge) for the image circle projected by this lens is smaller than that from of a normal lens. This is to cater to DSLR users who does not have the ability to achieve full frame fish eye due to the 1.5 times manification factor caused by the smaller sensor as compared to film.

Andy Ho
Andy Ho is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 16th November 2003   #24
VincentLin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 385
Default

Originally Posted by Andy Ho
You get vignetting on your pictures (circular shadows on the edge) for the image circle projected by this lens is smaller than that from of a normal lens. This is to cater to DSLR users who does not have the ability to achieve full frame fish eye due to the 1.5 times manification factor caused by the smaller sensor as compared to film.

Andy Ho
Vignetting is, of course, quite irritating. But the hilarious images you see in the viewfinder... remember that bunch of adverts with a dog whose nose is really inflated looking?

Try to imagine it being much more distorted.
VincentLin is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #25
Andy Ho
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Punggol
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by VincentLin
Vignetting is, of course, quite irritating. But the hilarious images you see in the viewfinder... remember that bunch of adverts with a dog whose nose is really inflated looking?

Try to imagine it being much more distorted.
Andy Ho is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #26
scanman
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Red White and stars.
Posts: 337
Default

one question..
if i m using a non digital nikon lens let say 50mm f2.0
if it fitted on D100 it will become 75mm rt? how abt the F stop?
will it change too?

thanks
scanman is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #27
VincentLin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 385
Default

Originally Posted by scanman
one question..
if i m using a non digital nikon lens let say 50mm f2.0
if it fitted on D100 it will become 75mm rt? how abt the F stop?
will it change too?

thanks
ur F wouldn't change. the imaging sensor just does a crop - that's why u get a magnification factor.

experts... please elaborate. I'm no digital junkie.
VincentLin is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #28
scanman
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Red White and stars.
Posts: 337
Default

ic ic ... i m worried that it might lose out on the f stop.

BTW... a digital camera when using a conventional flash gun say SB 28 wont have the TTL function rt?
scanman is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #29
johnyu
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by scanman
one question..
if i m using a non digital nikon lens let say 50mm f2.0
if it fitted on D100 it will become 75mm rt? how abt the F stop?
will it change too?

thanks
While the F-stop stays the same, the effective DOF on DSLR for the same FOV as on 135 (35mm) format is deeper. That means it's harder to get nice out of focus background...

(Note: The effective DOF is affected by the cropping of the smaller CCD size and that we move further away from the subject to maintain the same FOV. http://dfleming.ameranet.com/dof_dslr.html has a good article on it. http://www.photo.net/learn/optics/dofdigital/ has a more technical, but somewhat confusing, article.)
johnyu is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #30
johnyu
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by scanman
ic ic ... i m worried that it might lose out on the f stop.

BTW... a digital camera when using a conventional flash gun say SB 28 wont have the TTL function rt?
Tranditional TTL flash won't work on DSLR. (Manual mode works though.)

Reason: The TTL flash metering is performed by measuring the light reflected from the film surface *when* the shutter curtain is opened. The body cuts off the flash when its meter says enough light is collected. CCD got some nastily reflection property that rules out this approach.

Newer "DX" flashes perform "psuedo TTL": they use pre-flashes to meter and calculate the required outuput *before* the shutter curtain is opened. (Yes, this is similar to the auto fill-in monitor pre-flash.) The downside of doing this is if it is a fast-moving subject, the reading can be wrong.
johnyu is offline  
Old 16th November 2003   #31
scanman
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Red White and stars.
Posts: 337
Default

ic ic...

so those old Metz flash gun cant be used on DSLR even if i change the adapter. rt?
scanman is offline  
Old 17th November 2003   #32
MatthewSL
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 156
Default

excellent wideview lens! got mine last weekend from john 3:16.
MatthewSL is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #33
bearycute
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by scanman
ic ic...

so those old Metz flash gun cant be used on DSLR even if i change the adapter. rt?
Not all DSLR cant ttl... S2Pro can
bearycute is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #34
johnyu
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by bearycute
Not all DSLR cant ttl... S2Pro can
Yes, bearycute is right! Fuji S2Pro can do TTL with "classic" non-DX flashes, even with AIS lenses. Amazing! (How do they do it? )
johnyu is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #35
ckiang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
Default

Originally Posted by johnyu
Yes, bearycute is right! Fuji S2Pro can do TTL with "classic" non-DX flashes, even with AIS lenses. Amazing! (How do they do it? )
Yes it can. Dunno how far it's true, but I heard from some S2 Pro users that the TTL on the S2 Pro isn't accurate. And read somewhere the S2 Pro TTL works only up to 400, dunno what will happen at ISO 800 though.

Then again, D-TTL on D100 is also very erratic...

Regards
CK
ckiang is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #36
Larry
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,097
Default

Originally Posted by scanman
Hi

What happen when u fix the 10.5 DX lens on normal SLR?
wat the effect?
actually, at the CS-Nikon outing, someone mounted this little baby (the DX fisheye) on a film camera. the vignetting isn't circular, it's this weird rectangular shape. hard to describe though... guess when it's avail someone will post up a sample pix.
Larry is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #37
scanman
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Red White and stars.
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by ckiang
Yes it can. Dunno how far it's true, but I heard from some S2 Pro users that the TTL on the S2 Pro isn't accurate. And read somewhere the S2 Pro TTL works only up to 400, dunno what will happen at ISO 800 though.

Then again, D-TTL on D100 is also very erratic...

Regards
CK


Is it mention anywhere that normal flash could be used on S2
using normal TTL function?
scanman is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.11784 seconds with 7 queries