![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8
|
Hi, anyone has any opinion regarding Nikon cameras that has cmos image sensor and those that dont? I really wondering if paying more for models like D90 and D300 is worth it. Otherwise, I just settle for D80 or 2nd hand D200. By the way, why do I have to keep setting the date for my office D40x everytime I power it up?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
|
__________________
life is but a dream... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8
|
Oh. I thought newer Nikon cameras like D90 has cmos image sensor as opposed to the older D200 that uses ccd sensor.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 459
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
|
The cmos vs non-cmos (ccd) is pretty much a marketing thing: companies trying to justify their technological decisions based on costs and not ultimate performance. Fuji's Super EXR CCD is considered one of the best in the business esp for night shots.
CMOS is cheaper in terms of HVM (high-volume manufacturing) as it reuses microprocessor fabrication tech. But it's more costly to optimize its design. So it pretty much balances out. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,136
|
Going back to your original question, you have to remember that the price of a camera, or it's relative worth or value to a user is dependent on many other factors besides just what sensor it uses. Look at the overall combination very carefully, then decixde if it's worth it for your own usage. Yes, unfortunately that means research, reading and discerning.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Serangoon Gardens
Posts: 309
|
CCD Noise is nicer than CMOS noise. So says my friend whos fed up with all the high iso, low noise competition and decided to do noise texture comparisions.
__________________
5D MII w/16-35L,Sigma 28-70&Nikkors(35f2,85f1.4,105f2.5,180f2.8ED) http://joshsiao.spaces.live.com |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8
|
Thank you for all your input! I aim to buy a Nikon DSLR next year after my year end bonus. Ha ha. A lot of time for research.
I hate my current Fuji Finepix S5800's picture noise. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,301
|
both are ok, apples and oranges today, honestly
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,952
|
First of all, you have to read up more on the 2 different forms of technology and understand better on why each makers use the different technology.
Next up, is compare on the cameras properly using proper review sites or data. Then make a educated decision on the choice. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,964
|
I would not choose a camera based on the parts / electronics it uses. Technologies keep changing anyway. And unless you're buying sensors, the functionalities and its performance are what count.
Ryan |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
|
CCD based on theory is better senor than CMOS.. there is also silicon sensor but i think no one is currently using it...
__________________
life is but a dream... |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,964
|
Kodak is still making high resolution CCD sensors for medium format digital back
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
|
i meant pure silicon minus CCD, CMOS quotes...
__________________
life is but a dream... |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
|
ya, during the initial digital age, 1MP kodak CCD back cost SGD10,000...
__________________
life is but a dream... |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|