ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 24th April 2009   #1
Eddie Current
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8
Default Cmos vs non-cmos.

Hi, anyone has any opinion regarding Nikon cameras that has cmos image sensor and those that dont? I really wondering if paying more for models like D90 and D300 is worth it. Otherwise, I just settle for D80 or 2nd hand D200. By the way, why do I have to keep setting the date for my office D40x everytime I power it up?
Eddie Current is offline  
Old 24th April 2009   #2
twisted illusion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by Eddie Current View Post
Hi, anyone has any opinion regarding Nikon cameras that has cmos image sensor and those that dont? I really wondering if paying more for models like D90 and D300 is worth it. Otherwise, I just settle for D80 or 2nd hand D200. By the way, why do I have to keep setting the date for my office D40x everytime I power it up?
erm, what are you tryin to ask huh.. CMOS is cheaper to make compare to CCD.. base on this theory, all CMOS equiped camera is cheaper.. to buy or not to buy used camera is really up to your own perference..
__________________
life is but a dream...
twisted illusion is offline  
Old 24th April 2009   #3
Eddie Current
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Oh. I thought newer Nikon cameras like D90 has cmos image sensor as opposed to the older D200 that uses ccd sensor.
Eddie Current is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 24th April 2009   #4
romeo tango
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 459
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by Eddie Current View Post
why do I have to keep setting the date for my office D40x everytime I power it up?
check the internal battery. It might be dead.
romeo tango is offline  
Old 25th April 2009   #5
cks2k2
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

The cmos vs non-cmos (ccd) is pretty much a marketing thing: companies trying to justify their technological decisions based on costs and not ultimate performance. Fuji's Super EXR CCD is considered one of the best in the business esp for night shots.

Originally Posted by twisted illusion View Post
erm, what are you tryin to ask huh.. CMOS is cheaper to make compare to CCD.. base on this theory, all CMOS equiped camera is cheaper.. to buy or not to buy used camera is really up to your own perference..
CMOS is cheaper in terms of HVM (high-volume manufacturing) as it reuses microprocessor fabrication tech. But it's more costly to optimize its design. So it pretty much balances out.
cks2k2 is offline  
Old 25th April 2009   #6
Dream Merchant
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,136
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Going back to your original question, you have to remember that the price of a camera, or it's relative worth or value to a user is dependent on many other factors besides just what sensor it uses. Look at the overall combination very carefully, then decixde if it's worth it for your own usage. Yes, unfortunately that means research, reading and discerning.
Dream Merchant is offline  
Old 25th April 2009   #7
JoshSiao
Member
 
JoshSiao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Serangoon Gardens
Posts: 309
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

CCD Noise is nicer than CMOS noise. So says my friend whos fed up with all the high iso, low noise competition and decided to do noise texture comparisions.
__________________
5D MII w/16-35L,Sigma 28-70&Nikkors(35f2,85f1.4,105f2.5,180f2.8ED) http://joshsiao.spaces.live.com
JoshSiao is offline  
Old 25th April 2009   #8
Eddie Current
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Thank you for all your input! I aim to buy a Nikon DSLR next year after my year end bonus. Ha ha. A lot of time for research.
I hate my current Fuji Finepix S5800's picture noise.
Eddie Current is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #9
night86mare
Senior Member
 
night86mare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,301
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

both are ok, apples and oranges today, honestly
__________________
Gallery | Dreamscapes 09
Pentaxian 伪君子之所以更可憎
night86mare is online now  
Old 26th April 2009   #10
zac08
Senior Member
 
zac08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,952
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

First of all, you have to read up more on the 2 different forms of technology and understand better on why each makers use the different technology.

Next up, is compare on the cameras properly using proper review sites or data. Then make a educated decision on the choice.
__________________
Michael Lim
My Flickr Site APAD 2009
zac08 is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #11
giantcanopy
Member
 
giantcanopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,964
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

I would not choose a camera based on the parts / electronics it uses. Technologies keep changing anyway. And unless you're buying sensors, the functionalities and its performance are what count.

Ryan
__________________
Kaleidoscopy & Singapore Shave!
Shaving Jedi
giantcanopy is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #12
twisted illusion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by Eddie Current View Post
Oh. I thought newer Nikon cameras like D90 has cmos image sensor as opposed to the older D200 that uses ccd sensor.
CCD based on theory is better senor than CMOS.. there is also silicon sensor but i think no one is currently using it...
__________________
life is but a dream...
twisted illusion is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #13
cks2k2
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by twisted illusion View Post
CCD based on theory is better senor than CMOS.. there is also silicon sensor but i think no one is currently using it...
They're all made from silicon.
cks2k2 is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #14
giantcanopy
Member
 
giantcanopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,964
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by twisted illusion View Post
CCD based on theory is better senor than CMOS.. there is also silicon sensor but i think no one is currently using it...
Kodak is still making high resolution CCD sensors for medium format digital back
__________________
Kaleidoscopy & Singapore Shave!
Shaving Jedi
giantcanopy is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #15
twisted illusion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by cks2k2 View Post
They're all made from silicon.
i meant pure silicon minus CCD, CMOS quotes...
__________________
life is but a dream...
twisted illusion is offline  
Old 26th April 2009   #16
twisted illusion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Default Re: Cmos vs non-cmos.

Originally Posted by giantcanopy View Post
Kodak is still making high resolution CCD sensors for medium format digital back
ya, during the initial digital age, 1MP kodak CCD back cost SGD10,000...
__________________
life is but a dream...
twisted illusion is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.10520 seconds with 7 queries