ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Fujifilm


 
Thread Tools
Old 6th November 2003   #1
james0001
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 91
Default how good is finepix S2 pro vs D100 or canon 10D ?

trying to get a second hand finepix S2 pro but how good is it ?
owners of finepix S2 pro, would u mind to contribute ur views . thanks
james0001 is offline  
Old 6th November 2003   #2
Bluestrike
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: There lor~
Posts: 4,843
Default

Each has its own merits.

It like compairing Pear, Oranges and Apple.......
Bluestrike is offline  
Old 6th November 2003   #3
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,395
Default

Originally Posted by Bluestrike
Each has its own merits.

It like compairing Pear, Oranges and Apple.......
at least pear & apples are sweeter than oranges...
oranges have more juice...
apples are most crunchy...
pear is just good to eat sometimes...
__________________
.
The
Visual Journalist
AReality is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 6th November 2003   #4
erwinx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,492
Default

I found this review somewhere so I quote it here for your benefit:

Nikon: Good
Canon: Good
Fuji: Good

Frankly, your question is too vague. Surely you've printed out all the pages of the dpreview reviews of the 3 cameras and also downloaded the sample pics? After reading them, exactly which part are you not sure about?

In case you haven't heard of dpreview, link here: www.dpreview.com
erwinx is offline  
Old 6th November 2003   #5
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

there're also other very good review sites: www.imaging-resource.com , www.steves-digicams.com , www.dcresource.com , www.megapixel.net
mpenza is offline  
Old 6th November 2003   #6
tweakmax
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by james0001
trying to get a second hand finepix S2 pro but how good is it ?
owners of finepix S2 pro, would u mind to contribute ur views . thanks
Fujifilm did a good job in keeping the noise down (e.g. ISO1600)

I often shoot my film at ISO1600 and I find the pics very usable

http://www.pbase.com/laoda/sg_selection

http://www.pbase.com/karate_demo_taka/inbox

http://www.pbase.com/karate_demo_taka/tink_tink

Hope this helps u make a decision
__________________
Canon 10D / Sigma 10-22 EX HSM / Sigma 50-150 EX HSM
tweakmax is offline  
Old 6th November 2003   #7
Belle&Sebastain
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: here
Posts: 3,752
Default

s2pro
d100
10d

got moola
Belle&Sebastain is offline  
Old 7th November 2003   #8
sfhuang
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 972
Default

S2 Pro's strongest advantage: pictures that come out of it need little post-processing if any at all.

and yes, moola LAGI
sfhuang is offline  
Old 7th November 2003   #9
rueyloon
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,538
Default

ok

from exprienced gathered from my 2 friends

1) s2pro images provides more latitude for adjustments
2) a friend who moved from d100 to 10D said this when I asked him how's the improvement "pretty good, probably something like your s2pro"

Cheers
rueyloon is offline  
Old 7th November 2003   #10
Jay
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East
Posts: 689
Default

Came across an article (cant remember where) that Fuji gives better skin tone than the D100 which is better for landscape shots. Its also optimized for microdrive whereas D100 is for compact flash .. but it doesn't mean that using otherwise is inefficient or problematic .. its just slower.

Also S2 can use Smart Media too and has Firewire connection.

And of course you can shoot up to est 12 meg pixels.
Jay is offline  
Old 7th November 2003   #11
sfhuang
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 972
Default

If you like Velvia color, you will dig S2 pro. It's addictive, trust me.
sfhuang is offline  
Old 7th November 2003   #12
rueyloon
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,538
Default

just want to add, alot of people got put off by the s2pro due to the dual battery configuration, but inreality, you only need 1 set to operate the camera, so it is a non issue.

the biggest problem I find with the s2 is the small view finder, which at times makes it hard to compose the shots, image wise, it is very good.

hence the for the s2 vs d100, it is image quality vs handing. (d100 has better handling/ergonomics)

held the d10, feels very good in the hands too, can't comment about the image quality.

cheers
rueyloon is offline  
Old 15th November 2003   #13
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

erwinx: You used my review

Jokes aside, the S2 Pro gives very nice skin tones. All are just as good if you asked me, erwinx has already used my review of these three brands extensively.

Remember, another man's meat, is another man's poison, go for what you like, feel touch and play around first
espn is offline  
Old 17th November 2003   #14
kthan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,318
Default

How about S2 , able to do TTL, vs D100 DTTL? That means you can use any old flash in the market ?

That was my consideration when I was looking for a DSLR for underwater photography. I don't shoot much land shots.

Depends on your needs....
kthan is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #15
Jay
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East
Posts: 689
Default

Originally Posted by kthan
How about S2 , able to do TTL, vs D100 DTTL? That means you can use any old flash in the market ?

That was my consideration when I was looking for a DSLR for underwater photography. I don't shoot much land shots.

Depends on your needs....
The S2 body is almost identical to the F80 and therefore should be able to use similar flash. In the S2 manual, it could TTL from SB11 upward! I have used it with the SB25 and it worked.

Cheers
Jay is offline  
Old 18th November 2003   #16
jo3pit
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 406
Default

imho
you won't go wrong with S2 or D100, since both uses F mount lense...

except canon has wider variety of lenses

Last edited by jo3pit; 19th November 2003 at 10:58 AM.
jo3pit is offline  
Old 19th November 2003   #17
coke21
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East
Posts: 728
Default

There is a recent review of the S2 Pro. Heres the link http://www.vividlight.com/articles/3112.htm
coke21 is offline  
Old 19th November 2003   #18
sfhuang
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 972
Default

Originally Posted by coke21
There is a recent review of the S2 Pro. Heres the link http://www.vividlight.com/articles/3112.htm
great review!

I was astounded especially by the marked difference in how the two cameras record green and blue in their default modes as shown in the article.
sfhuang is offline  
Old 20th November 2003   #19
Pro Image
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Last planet from the sun
Posts: 2,822
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
at least pear & apples are sweeter than oranges...
oranges have more juice...
apples are most crunchy...
pear is just good to eat sometimes...



Now that's a one quote i kept laughing whole day!!!! Good one!!!
Pro Image is offline  
Old 9th December 2003   #20
giddygoat
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 308
Default

Hi,
me and my friend were discussing the same thing earlier today (or since it's past midnight, yesterday) and we came across this article comparing the S2pro to D100
www.bythom.com/s2d100.htm
the final verdict: buy both, whichever you like least can pass to me.
frankly, get either one, you wouldn't regret it. and though it pains me as a nikon user to say it, looking at the reviews at dpreview,it looks like the 10D is still king here.

Last edited by giddygoat; 9th December 2003 at 02:37 AM.
giddygoat is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.12776 seconds with 7 queries