![]() |
|
|||||||
| Night Photography For those that like to expose in the dark of the night. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
|
ok..i see a lot of photographers saying that if you love shooting at night grab a fast lens especially the f/1.4 to f/2.8..now the question is based on your shooting experience and the existing nikkor, sigma and tamron glass nowadays..what's the best glass you suggest for my new D90.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hougang, Sengkang
Posts: 5,347
|
Unless you are talking about low-light environment such as events or on travel and no time to set-up tripod. Then you need a fast lens but I think most of the time, people rather push up the ISO. I think you need to consider what you want to shoot, human subjects, landscape, record shot?
__________________
莫问前程有愧,只求今生无悔. Time pasts, Places changed, Beauty faded, what is left are Photos of Memories… |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
if you insist, can have 14~24, 24~70, 70~200 these three lenses, and you able to cover from 14mm to 200mm all at f2.8 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Where the action is
Posts: 1,310
|
![]() The Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 is all you need for low light landscape photography. It costs $940 only. Get the Nikkor AFD-50mm f1.4 at $500+ if you need to take low light portraits. If you want a do it all lens, then the Nikkor 16-85mm VR will not disappoint. Solid VR. It had enabled me to take sharp pictures at night under low light condition without tripod.
__________________
In search of excellence in photography. Last edited by TheChef; 19th April 2009 at 10:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 339
|
May i suggest you Sigma 30mm F1.4. I used it to took very nice and sharp night photos when i do not feel like to bring mine tripod along.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,259
|
there is the new AF-S 35mm DX F1.8 to try.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
|
hey guys thanks, i'm thinkin of f/1.4 for low-light photography or should i go to f/2.8? 3rd party glass like tamron and sigma were also my options but some people says that nikkor glass is more sharp..in other words when it comes it nikkor "you've got what you pay for".
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 339
|
Last edited by Omega23; 21st April 2009 at 01:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,149
|
Noct Nikkor ftw!
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 664
|
What Francis 247 said is right.
It depends on your subjects & theme. Pushing the ISO has it's limits as some cameras get noisey pics above 800. How does the D90 perform in this field? Shooting in low light & hand held, you'll need fast lens but shooting nightscapes, you'd need a tripod & cable release/trigger plus regular lens. Better if it's wide angle. Don't forget that opening the F stop all the way produces soft pictures as well. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
|
hmmm..how about 50mm f/1.4G or 50mm f/1.4D for D90? whats the differ when shooting low light?
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|