Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 71 of 71

Thread: Review: All Camera Brands Being Reviewed!

  1. #61
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    6,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snappist
    I am back!

    OMG.... this benissez later charge all viewers a "viewing fee" for viewing his controversial review. And he will end off with saying that many newbies have pmed him and complimented him for an excellent review.
    snappist, that's a good one!

  2. #62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benissez
    On a work like this (not paid), the onus is on those who disagree to prove there disagreement. If not, they have the right to remain silent or being viewed as sub i.
    Monkey crap again...

    post on free forum his "review", and still complain that his review is not paid... like he is doing some charity to save Africa's famine.

    And his characteristic slur on others' intelligence speaks volumes on his own intelligence!

  3. #63

    Default

    Not just newbies leading newbies, but ignorant newbies trying to act like they know it all, when in reality they have no idea what they're blabbering about. Photography as we know it has a near century existence , and some people think they can be an expert in a few days..

  4. #64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwongsm
    BTW, benissez, why remove your "Scrap Book"?? ... let us see your pics.
    Out of public spiritedness, I shall provide you the link to view his pics.
    http://www.imagestation.com/member/?name=bwwong
    I think he may have accidentally deleted the link that he used to provide.

    We must learn from benissez... he is so helpful to help arrange for 4 photographers at a low fee of $50 each that will ensure their safety, angles and composition. What an excellent arrangement for such a low fee.

    To those who applied and were rejected, don't be disheartened. Go and contact your friends who either belong to some clubs, association, company or government bodies and offer to arrange for some photographers for their event. And thru this, if you are intelligent enough. You can earn from both sides. Charge the clients a fee. Charge the suckers you have lured an "arrangement fee" too. Like that you will be more intelligent as there are lots of suckers who will believe your monkey crap. Right?

    Now benissez is setting the record straight with a legendary "unpaid" review.

    Thank you benissez for everything.

  5. #65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by henavs
    We do appreciate his effort in writing review initially. But some of us were just trying to clarify the info in his review.

    He couldn't handle advice & suggestions very well...

    Btw...Hmmm...R u related in anyway?
    If you ever want to have split personalities, pls cultivate the personalities for a while before using them to side you in your posts. Having some other personality side you on his/her first post is a dead giveaway.

    - FORUM 101 - Chapter 5 Assuming Forum Personalities

  6. #66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snappist
    Monkey crap again...

    post on free forum his "review", and still complain that his review is not paid... like he is doing some charity to save Africa's famine.

    And his characteristic slur on others' intelligence speaks volumes on his own intelligence!


    You're farny! definitely pissing him off

  7. #67
    Member Knighthunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
    Posts
    958

    Default

    Hmm....the statistic says:
    14 Canon Users Reply This Thread (One is ex Canon move to L brand)
    3 Nikon Users Reply This Thread (Incl. Me)
    2 Fuji Users Reply This Thread
    2 Olympus Users Reply This Thread
    1 Minolta User Reply This Thread

    Hmm...... WHY? Interesting.....LOL

    (Disclaimer: The tally may not accurate since some of the poster do not mention camera brand they use)
    W204FL

  8. #68
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    hErE lAh
    Posts
    975

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snappist
    Out of public spiritedness, I shall provide you the link to view his pics.
    http://www.imagestation.com/member/?name=bwwong
    I think he may have accidentally deleted the link that he used to provide.
    u sure accidental? eh abit mean ah - pple maybe dun wan we all to see & u go & post the link here

  9. #69

    Default

    In all fairness, this may really be a legitimate post to start with. But it has a troll post written all over it. Kinda reminds me of the photo.net forum where people will intentionally post subjects that they know will generate "heat" and sit back and enjoy the fire....

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    DEATH*
    Posts
    604

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snappist
    Out of public spiritedness, I shall provide you the link to view his pics.
    http://www.imagestation.com/member/?name=bwwong
    I think he may have accidentally deleted the link that he used to provide.

    We must learn from benissez... he is so helpful to help arrange for 4 photographers at a low fee of $50 each that will ensure their safety, angles and composition. What an excellent arrangement for such a low fee.

    To those who applied and were rejected, don't be disheartened. Go and contact your friends who either belong to some clubs, association, company or government bodies and offer to arrange for some photographers for their event. And thru this, if you are intelligent enough. You can earn from both sides. Charge the clients a fee. Charge the suckers you have lured an "arrangement fee" too. Like that you will be more intelligent as there are lots of suckers who will believe your monkey crap. Right?

    Now benissez is setting the record straight with a legendary "unpaid" review.

    Thank you benissez for everything.

    Eh??? I tok he's a ger??? http://forums.clubsnap.org/member.php?u=6401

  11. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Northwest
    Posts
    5,011

    Default

    I think this thread is going nowhere, so I will close it here.
    As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •