![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 620
|
Have a question and tried asking Mr.Google
but somehow didnt get a very clear answer.. Hope some gurus can help shed some light Canon LTM 50 F1.2 at close to minimum focusing distance wide open aperture no ( or not significant to notice) focus shift shooting on a ZI Same Canon LTM 50 F1.2 at close to minimum focusing distance again same wide open aperture focus correct on patch, picture come out focus shift to rear alittle shooting on a friend's M8 check again shoot at infinity is like totally out need turn back the focus alittle but didnt try infinity on the ZI Qn: is there a way to tune thie LTM 50 to focus correctly on M8? as in like tune the lens? because if tune M8, will it be focus correct when using other lens? cos ZM50, cron35ASPH, cron35 IV all turn out focus spot on correct any comments? Cheers ![]()
__________________
F |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 1,270
|
i faced the same problem as well when i use the 50mm on the rd1s. no problem using it on my m6 and no focus problem with other fast lens on the rd1s. only the canon f1.2.
though i no longer owns a drf. i would like to be enlightened on this too.... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
|
Hi, I am no guru, but hope I can be of help.
I had the same problem shooting my fast lens, they all back focus a little on close distance on my M8 when my crons and others are ok. Turn out that my M8 is off. What I did was, with my fast lens, I turn to infinity and focus on the furthest subject I can find (example, the moon). To my surprise, my focusing patch registered a double image, it means that even though I have focused to infinity on a distant object, my focus patch is off, registering a out-of-focus when it should be in focus. What I did next is described here; http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...-solution.html It is actually very simple, no need to dismantle anything, no need to open any screws, just turn the nut there a little with a 2mm allen key. Now, my lens is spot on, except for a Hex 60 1.2 which is still back focusing a wee bit, about 2 cm, which seems to be common for a Konica. Hope this helps.
__________________
My Flickr |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West
Posts: 784
|
i shoot all my lens on a focusing chart.. that way, i know how much is off.
just remember how much to plus or minus.. u must make friend with the gears. ![]() Last edited by nordleadx; 13th April 2009 at 07:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 443
|
I had a Canon 1.2 LTM that was experienced focus shift on the R-D1s when shooting wide open. I basically learnt to recognise the offset from the double image to identify when the focus point should be in order to compensate for the focus shift. Its quite easy once you get the hang of it.
__________________
www.flickr.com/photos/vurtopia |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: High Lander
Posts: 351
|
canon 50/1.2 being LTM, it would need a LTM to M adapter for it to be used on M-cameras. Since it's back/front focus, one could either adjust the RF cam on the M camera (not hard to do, BUT then you risk creating new focusing problems for your other M lenses), or, try using another LTM - M adapter. I have 3 different adapters and their thickness vary a wee bit. How knows, you may be lucky enough to find a perfect match.
Of course there is a "better" solution: send the canon 50/1.2 to DAG. Sure to work, but it could be a $500 + 3-months-wait kind of solution. Just my 1 peanut. YOL Last edited by YOL925; 13th April 2009 at 07:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 620
|
Thanks guy for the answers...
the LTM50 at infinity on my friend's M8, rf patch is aligned but image on display is not in focus so looks like is a complete focus range shift plus i kinda think of getting M8 to use with the LTM50 to do some people and fashion work cant possibly offset the focus every shot sure die and already too many things to watchout for This time i think really problem scarly tune the M8 then the rest of the lens off then largi siao liao anyone else have any other suggestions? Dun use M8 lar = not a way out cos using dslr like dun have the feel Dun use LTM50 lar = then? Noct? no money ... so tricky, tricky, tricky...my rf brudders ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
F |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Moses' Hill
Posts: 936
|
If all your other lenses are ok; I would not suggest adjusting the camera.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Excelsior S.C #02-25
Posts: 2,367
|
This problem of yours is pretty common and that's the reason why Mr Benny has so many copies of the 50/f1.2....
![]() There were many theories surrounding the mystery and each solution gives different result on different copies of lens. Hence, scientific solutions don't actually solve this strange phenomenon of the 21st Century... Well... after saying so much rubbish... I have one solution for you... If you want to use it for work, where focus accuracy is important and want that OOF background look, shoot with G1. Well, I am sure many die hard M8 fans will throw rotten eggs and start cursing at me and say the G1 is nothing but a point and shoot and no feel.... But before you make the comment yourself, get a copy and try out for at least 2 hours and fully understand the camera and how to focus efficiently and effectively. It's no means as fun or fast and intuitive as the RF, but focusing is 100% (if not 99.99%) accurate on the EVF or Live View. Sensor wise, might not be as "good" as the M8, but you can shoot raw and do the relevant tweaks to make it look as good as any D series professional DSLR. Well... if all else fails... shoot with film lah... save all the money for another trip to Japan! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 620
|
gommy - thats what i thought too
chiif - got to give the G1 some thought then...looks like bo pian liao...besides, " shoot with film lah... save all the money for another trip to Japan! " is a very sound idea.. ![]()
__________________
F |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 360
|
bro,
from what I understand, its the m8 that is giving the problem. your lens is perfectly fine. sensor is too flat. Having spoken to philip tay on this issue before. He dont recommend anyone touch the lens else they wouldnt focus correct on other bodies after calibration, only can use on that single m8 alone ![]() m8 is seriously flawed. thanks to the "extras" they add on the sensor Last edited by DoveVadar; 14th April 2009 at 11:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 1,715
|
Look for other options lor. Konica has a 50mm f/1.2, as do Fujinon, Zunow or the Nokkor 50mm f/1.1. And if all else fails on the M8, surely the Noct can do the job. ![]() I do have one copy of the Canon 50mm f/1.2 LTM optimised for M8. It does not focus well on the R-D1. Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 1,715
|
![]() Despite it's various short comings (which is fiercely defended by it's loyalists), the M8 has it's charms and it much readily available than the only other digital alternative. Besides, it has so many color options! For me, Leica is great at optics and all things mechanical. The only decent Leica digital cameras are those made in Japan! Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 884
|
Well I don't have the Canon 50/1.2. The CV version was great, except a little soft wide open. My M8 went totally out of whack and had to go on a 10 weeks holiday in Germany. Now the CV is performing like it never did before. The CV is painfully sharp even wide open. I would suggest the M8 needs a little adjusting.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 620
|
DoveVadar - I love film too much.. will never take any risk to "screw up" (pun intended) calibration on other bodies...
![]() benny - SG pools didnt take up my proposal to them to sponsor me a Noct leh also dun have $ to keep twp LTM50 lah... bernards - CV 50F1.5 is a very very good value for $ lens...i use to have one.. looks like still film is the best...grain, smell of D76 and all the other beautiful qualities.. ![]()
__________________
F |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 360
|
Well, I wouldnt mind a digital rangefinder for pre-location shoot. Its small, quiet and you get pics instantly
Im seriously considering 1 for this purpose. but maybe not leica (for such a price!) Im looking forward to the japan counter attack on digital rf.and I dont have alot of gear lah. haha. alredy very streamline liao. selling all my P6s!! lelong lelong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 360
|
ya loh. agreed. best is to try on another m8 or 8.2 and see how. anything fishy, sell it straight. with digital, u r losing $ everyday....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 1,715
|
Anyway, look like the market is just not big enough for a digital RF to be a profitable venture. I do hope something is in the pipeline though. Niche products do have their places in the market. Till then, film is best and the current digital RF cameras are used to test lens focus and alignment. Just joking! Digital users don't flame me!!Cheers, p.s. I do know that there's a minty Epson R-D1s with a Hexanon 50m f/2 going for around 2.5K.... Dump the Hexanon and you'll have a sub 2K digital RF!! Still cheaper than a 3.2K used M8. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Moses' Hill
Posts: 936
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 884
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|