i'm just super curious who's that photog at the top right corner...
Playing with M43.
i'm was there for the shoot, knowing some detail... the ST journalist is a invited guest by candleghost n the ST journalist actually got a permission from candleghost to do the shoot openly.. (without disturbing the shoot)
thru what i know surrephoto did not state clearly on the issue about the ST journalist n creating a misunderstanding to every one tot he is a spy in the shoot..
also to my understanding the picture shown the ST journalist, he was on his way down n spot there is a group shooting.. without disturbing the group, that is y he is sitting on the stair to view his shots..
to the whole thing from what i c, that is surrephoto is trying to tell everyone.. he is there for the shoot n got a interview with the ST journalist... i believe surrephoto was so happy till forget to let everyone know about ST journalist was invited n posting a misleading picture...
i think we all know that the photographer wasn't shooting sneakily, as he would have been restricted by the lens. furthermore, from the ST article, it is clear that he was given permission, as he was just right behind the photogs taking photos of Krislynn
the way it shows as if photographers n model didnt know about it n was sound being shot by undercover.. the way being say till candleghost didnt protect his models and photographers...
i really hope surrephoto could clear all the misunderstanding, cause it really creating a misleading to all the whole CS members here..
i beg to differ. in the case of the crouching tiger, which person would not notice a camera aimed at them?
a person could also tell that a shot taken from the second story would not have given the perspective of the photo that was published in the papers.
it can be inferred that the photogs and models were therefore aware of the ST reporter's presence. I know you are a long time supporter of candleghost and his shoots, but really, is there a need for such obstinance?
lol @ candleghost too. i know you like to allow your photographers to shoot stuff hurr? a certain sb24 user from your shoot was caught taking pictures of another model at another shoot. So, this photographer taking pictures of your models also nothing wrong what. sneaky meh.?
shooters from surrephoto's shoot went to shoot your models? lol you see ghost? the only uninvited guests were the ones from your group.
I started the issue not means i kpkb you. Furthermore i asked whether my people went to shoot your models or not.
Why be so heated up when you yourself don't find it an issue?
With regards to the apology, i apologised to you because i agreed with that theres nothing anyone can do with other people (whether other groupshoot participants) taking shots of whats happening in public.
We are organisers, you don't want your participants to be satisfied? We promise them a ratio and it is preferable that the quota is maintained. This is not random street tourist/singaporean taking curiousity photos...
Don't mind discussing but lets not get personal.
This is the kopitiam and i am simply showing photographs to showcase some real-life images of what happened.
"He takes a shot.." Did i say he was doing it at the moment? Was he at the exact moment of pressing the trigger?
"The next day". It's true that the photograph appeared in the papers the next day.
Please, i did not specify the details not means i'm trying to mislead people...
always the Light, .... always.
Thanks, sorry Michael if this issue has caused unhappiness to you.
Hope case is closed.
No more bickering .... let's talk about XMM shoots
always the Light, .... always.
if u still think u not it wrong, please go ahead creating news about yourself n without getting anyone involved... this is what i have to said to u...