![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shunfu
Posts: 1,034
|
Hi I am using a D40 right now and would like to know is this lens good for street photography.I know that it cant AF on D40 and I dont really mind manual focusing.If this is not a lens for photography,please suggest some lens.Zoom or prime ,im fine.My budget is around 530
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 269
|
Manual focusing in street photography is difficult unless you are very very good in that.
__________________
Nikon F2/F60/D200 24f2.8 35f2 50f1.4 AIS85f1.8 18-200VRII Tokina 20-35f2.8 SB900, CanonF1 50f1.4 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,090
|
55mm? 55mm 2.8 micro? or the 55mm f/1.2? or are you refering to the 50mm f/1.8 afd?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 48
|
Before my D300 I was using a D40 and manual focusing was hell trying to capture moving targets on street, with that kinda budget I'd honestly eithe rget a simple 18-55 VR, its idiot proof and with a nice range, it does the job for me. Or the 18-105 VR, Nice zoom with the ability to compose pictures easily with a 105mm focal length, It cost like 350 SGD first hand? I think. It's a really easy lens to use and to me I've used it and I think its an all purpose lens. But truth be told, 18-55 VR does the job all the time. at 3.5 the bokeh is decent so ts just nice. Dont need to splurge on the 50 mm F/1.5 which cost like 500+++ SGD first hand.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: bukit batok
Posts: 1,331
|
take the new AF-S 35mm f1.8, confirm can AF and is within your budget.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 36
|
Yes, the new 35/1.8 would be an excellent choice today. Or, if low light is your thing, the Sigma 30mm/1.4 HSM might be just what you need (around your budget, or a tad above only).
If you're into the true "manual experience", as MANY D40 users are, there's the Nikon 50mm/1.8D (real cheap, but GREAT). The "difficulty" experienced by some in manual focusing this and other manual-focus lenses is somewhat removed by constant practice, understanding DOF and aperture, and forking out a little money for a better focusing screen (see focusingscreen.com, for example). And yes, I do love a range of cameras I've owned over a few decades, up to the D300 with various lenses, but ... when I need to just grab a digital body and lense when stepping out for a stroll or wandering about the city, I find myself thoroughly happy with the D40+50mm/1.8D (day) or D40+30/1.4 (night) - because either combo is small, inconspicuous, and delivers all I need, even in rather poor light. Caution with the Sigma 30/1.4 - check that the unit you buy is free of front/rear focus issues. Don't be shy to ask for help, and make sure the shop'll swap a poorly performing unit for a perfect one should you have any problem with it. Some pick the 50mm for street shooting over the 30mm because it gives just a little more "distance" - much depends on what YOU feel comfortable with! As for me, I'm Ok with either, but feel a little like a voyeur if I move to a 200mm a try to stay across the street, but that's a complete personal opinion! Good Luck! |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|