![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newton
Posts: 727
|
Has anyone ever worked with a meterless rangefinder with a compact digicam acting as (cheapskate) meter? The digicam - Fuji F30 - was just gathering dust so I had the bright idea (or not) of making it as a light meter. And since my only RF is an FSU, I personally find it strange to have to buy a meter 2-3 times more expensive than my cam. But that's just me.
I've tried a couple of negative rolls already, and the results look underexposed. You may wish to take a look here http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyril_in_cebu/ specially under the "Amsterdam" folder. I did remember - belatedly - someone writing that digicams mimic positive film's sensitivity and so are calibrated as such. Is that correct? Anyone else tried using a digicam with their FSU rfs? Thanks for any input! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 79
|
there can be a couple of variables here:
1. your film camera's shutter/iso settings are not working accurately 2. your digicam's iso may have some variance also so the two points combined may account for your underexposed shots. just my guesses. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newton
Posts: 727
|
You just gave me an idea.
I tried the same iso and aperture and eq. focal lengths on my Nikon D70 and my wife's Sony A350. The DSLRs agree with the Fuji. So it looks like I may have to check on the curtain tensions of the rangefinder. May be time to do some CLA. ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 181
|
Another possibility is that there is nothing wrong with the shutter on the film camera and that the underexposure is happening at the scanning or at post-processing stage?
If you are shooting colour negative film or traditional black+white film, there is quite a lot of dynamic range in the film which you might be able to recover scanning. You may want to: (a) try to rescan the films with a different setting; and/or (b) test your camera out with slide film which has a narrower DR and is less forgiving of wrong exposure. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 199
|
my guess is the shutter speed no longer accurate on the FSU body. dun bother CLA as its cheaper getting another FSU cam. just compensate 1 stop or pump up the exposure thru PP. btw, I am fine with ur amsterdam output.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newton
Posts: 727
|
![]() I just did a CLA myself, one thing I noticed is the shutter sound now is much nicer, more soft. I'm thinking of doing a test roll, 12 shots +1EV, next 12 as per digicam's exposure, and the last 12 -1EV underexposed. That should do the trick! ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|