ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 20th October 2003   #1
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,407
Default Kenko Pro 300 2x, so what happens?

How's the image quality using the Kenko Pro 300 2x with a EF 75-300mm lens?
Did a search and some said cannot auto-focus due to loss of 2 f-stops... also need at least F2.8 to focus...

Or is a 1.4x enuff already?
Just wanna some opinion from U guys 1st...


Thanks...
AReality is offline  
Old 20th October 2003   #2
mervlam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
How's the image quality using the Kenko Pro 300 2x with a EF 75-300mm lens?
Did a search and some said cannot auto-focus due to loss of 2 f-stops... also need at least F2.8 to focus...

Or is a 1.4x enuff already?
Just wanna some opinion from U guys 1st...


Thanks...
yup. if you want to use a 2x converter, your lens needs to have a max aperture of f/2.8, or chances are that the camera cant AF

I think focusing will not achieved even with the 1.4x converter. at f/8, the camera simply cant AF as it's "too dark".

why would you want a 150-600mm f/8-11 or a 105-420mm f/5.6-8?

Last edited by mervlam; 20th October 2003 at 04:11 PM.
mervlam is offline  
Old 20th October 2003   #3
E-Lim
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 303
Default

EF 75-300mm we know is not very sharp, get 1.4X to make it 105-420mm so that will not sacrifice the photo quality. For 2X TC you will definitely loose sharpness.
E-Lim is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 21st October 2003   #4
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,407
Default

Originally Posted by E-Lim
EF 75-300mm we know is not very sharp, get 1.4X to make it 105-420mm so that will not sacrifice the photo quality. For 2X TC you will definitely loose sharpness.
But I dun think it's correct to compare
focal length at 420mm with 1.4x TC,
with focal length at 600mm with 2x TC.

But I think should compare the quality with
focal length at 420mm with 1.4x TC,
with focal length at 420mm with 2x TC.

are both the quality the same?

My maths not very good... But is the max f-number the same for both TCs when zoom to the same focal length?
AReality is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #5
Bluestrike
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: There lor~
Posts: 4,848
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
But I dun think it's correct to compare
focal length at 420mm with 1.4x TC,
with focal length at 600mm with 2x TC.

But I think should compare the quality with
focal length at 420mm with 1.4x TC,
with focal length at 420mm with 2x TC.

are both the quality the same?

My maths not very good... But is the max f-number the same for both TCs when zoom to the same focal length?
Even if you compare the thing at the same focal len, your 420mm, the 1.4TC will def stand out sharper then the one with the 2xTC.

Well for the 1.4TC, the 420mm is the max focal length, so that will be at F5.6 + 1 stop. for the 2xTC, at 420mm, the F-stop is not at F5.6 so you have to see what the F-stop at 210mm then + 2 stop.
Bluestrike is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #6
megaweb
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,126
Default

TC should work similar like this

If your lens quality is very very sharp,

with 1.4x TC , it should have very sharp quality
with 2x TC , it should have sharp quality

so imagine if you have sharp lens like 75-300mm , what should you get after using TC ?
__________________
See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap | Pbase
megaweb is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #7
AReality
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,407
Default

Originally Posted by megaweb
TC should work similar like this

If your lens quality is very very sharp,

with 1.4x TC , it should have very sharp quality
with 2x TC , it should have sharp quality

so imagine if you have sharp lens like 75-300mm , what should you get after using TC ?
Teacher, my answer:

Since my lens is sharp,
with 1.4x TC , it should have quality.
with 2x TC , it should have.

correct?
AReality is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #8
Bluestrike
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: There lor~
Posts: 4,848
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
Teacher, my answer:

Since my lens is sharp,
with 1.4x TC , it should have quality.
with 2x TC , it should have.

correct?
THE BEST IS!!!

COME DOWN TO SEED TML!

I'l bring both the 1.4TC and 2xTC then you judge for yourself!

Bluestrike is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #9
E-Lim
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by AReality
Teacher, my answer:

Since my lens is sharp,
with 1.4x TC , it should have quality.
with 2x TC , it should have.

correct?
1.4X TC quality is better than 2X. Period.
E-Lim is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #10
mervlam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
Default

Originally Posted by megaweb
TC should work similar like this

If your lens quality is very very sharp,

with 1.4x TC , it should have very sharp quality
with 2x TC , it should have sharp quality

so imagine if you have sharp lens like 75-300mm , what should you get after using TC ?
to answer on behalf of "cher"

with 1.4x, okay only
with 2x, sucks

my point: dont bother using TC with that lens (btw, i own one, which i think it's not even considered sharp)
mervlam is offline  
Old 21st October 2003   #11
mervlam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
Default

Originally Posted by Bluestrike
THE BEST IS!!!

COME DOWN TO SEED TML!

I'l bring both the 1.4TC and 2xTC then you judge for yourself!

agree agree....
mervlam is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #12
HelmetBox
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
Default

If my lens is a 70-200 f2.8, will the 2X and 1.4X converters differ?

If the f stop remains unchanged,

will the quality differ at 150mm on the lens, which is
-210mm on the 1.4X ?
-300mm on the 2X ?

How about
-210mm on the 1.4X (150mm on lens)
and
-210mm on the 2X (105mm on lens)

Does the brand of the TC matter? I'm using a sigma lens EX HSM for canon, so should I go for canon or sigma TCs?

Please advise.......

Last edited by HelmetBox; 22nd October 2003 at 01:43 PM.
HelmetBox is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #13
mervlam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
Default

Originally Posted by HelmetBox
If my lens is a 70-200 f2.8, will the 2X and 1.4X converters differ?

If the f stop remains unchanged,

will the quality differ at 150mm on the lens, which is
-210mm on the 1.4X ?
-300mm on the 2X ?

How about
-210mm on the 1.4X (150mm on lens)
and
-210mm on the 2X (105mm on lens)

Does the brand of the TC matter? I'm using a sigma lens EX HSM for canon, so should I go for canon or sigma TCs?

Please advise.......
the quality of the 1.4x is relatively better than the 2x. it doesn't matter at what focal length. the job of the teleconverter is just to magnify the image by the magnification factor.

get the Sigma 1.4x APO EX.

Reference: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/html/pages/70_200_ex.htm
mervlam is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #14
HelmetBox
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
Default

Originally Posted by mervlam
the quality of the 1.4x is relatively better than the 2x. it doesn't matter at what focal length. the job of the teleconverter is just to magnify the image by the magnification factor.

get the Sigma 1.4x APO EX.

Reference: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/html/pages/70_200_ex.htm

Oh, okay! Thanks!
HelmetBox is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #15
Knighthunter
Member
 
Knighthunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
Posts: 1,014
Default

Originally Posted by HelmetBox
Does the brand of the TC matter? I'm using a sigma lens EX HSM for canon, so should I go for canon or sigma TCs?

Please advise.......
Canon TC price is 3/4 or more of your sigma lens' price......
Knighthunter is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #16
megaweb
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,126
Default

Please take notes :

Kenko TCs support Canon-EOS, Nikon-AF-D, and Minolta-AF lens
see http://www.thkphoto.com/products/kenko/slrc-01.html

Sigma TCs support Sigma lens only (Sigma Canon-EOS mount, Sigma Nikon-AF-D mount, Sigma Minolta-AF mount and Sigma Pentax AF mount lens)
see http://www.sigmaphoto.com/html/pages/ConvComptChart.htm

Canon TCs support Canon L lens (fixed focal length lenses 135mm and longer (except the 135mm f/2.8 Softfocus lens), and the EF 70-200 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 70-200 f/4.0L, and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS zoom lenses ) only
see http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/le...4x/ef_14x.html
and http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/le..._2x/ef_2x.html
__________________
See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap | Pbase
megaweb is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #17
HelmetBox
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
Default

Okay, so in my understanding (Please do correct me if I'm wrong):

-The 1.4X TC will reduce effective aperture by 1 stop (2.8 -> 3.2)
-The 2.0X TC will reduce effective aperture by 2 stops (2.8 -> 3.5)
-need for f/stop compensation depends on coupled lens
-Compatibility solely depends on TC type and manufacturer
-Quality of 1.4X is better than 2X
-Autofocus is only possible if the aperture of your lens is big to begin with as light reaching your sensors are reduced with the TC attached

Am I on the right track?
HelmetBox is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #18
mervlam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
Default

Originally Posted by HelmetBox
-The 1.4X TC will reduce effective aperture by 1 stop (2.8 -> 3.2)
-The 2.0X TC will reduce effective aperture by 2 stops (2.8 -> 3.5)
f/2.8 to f/4.0 -> 1 stop
f/2.8 to f/5.6 -> 2 stops

you multiply the aperture f number by sqrt(2) (which is 1.4) for one stop. that means you multiply by 2 for two stops.



Originally Posted by HelmetBox
-need for f/stop compensation depends on coupled lens
-Compatibility solely depends on TC type and manufacturer
-Quality of 1.4X is better than 2X
-Autofocus is only possible if the aperture of your lens is big to begin with as light reaching your sensors are reduced with the TC attached

Am I on the right track?
yup, i think

Last edited by mervlam; 22nd October 2003 at 06:24 PM.
mervlam is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #19
Knighthunter
Member
 
Knighthunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
Posts: 1,014
Default

Originally Posted by HelmetBox
Okay, so in my understanding (Please do correct me if I'm wrong):

-The 1.4X TC will reduce effective aperture by 1 stop (2.8 -> 3.2)
-The 2.0X TC will reduce effective aperture by 2 stops (2.8 -> 3.5)
f/2.8 + 1.4x = f/4
f/2.8 + 2 x = f/5.6

f/4 + 1.4x = f/5.6
f/4 + 2 x = f/8
Knighthunter is offline  
Old 22nd October 2003   #20
HelmetBox
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
Default

Originally Posted by mervlam
f/2.8 to f/4.0 -> 1 stop
f/2.8 to f/5.6 -> 2 stops

you multiply the aperture f number by sqrt(2) (which is 1.4) for one stop. that means you multiply by 2 for two stops.





yup, i think
rms value? hehe kidding.

Now I know....... interesting.
HelmetBox is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13929 seconds with 7 queries