![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,407
|
How's the image quality using the Kenko Pro 300 2x with a EF 75-300mm lens?
Did a search and some said cannot auto-focus due to loss of 2 f-stops... also need at least F2.8 to focus... Or is a 1.4x enuff already? Just wanna some opinion from U guys 1st... Thanks... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
I think focusing will not achieved even with the 1.4x converter. at f/8, the camera simply cant AF as it's "too dark". why would you want a 150-600mm f/8-11 or a 105-420mm f/5.6-8? Last edited by mervlam; 20th October 2003 at 04:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 303
|
EF 75-300mm we know is not very sharp, get 1.4X to make it 105-420mm so that will not sacrifice the photo quality. For 2X TC you will definitely loose sharpness.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,407
|
focal length at 420mm with 1.4x TC, with focal length at 600mm with 2x TC. But I think should compare the quality with focal length at 420mm with 1.4x TC, with focal length at 420mm with 2x TC. are both the quality the same? My maths not very good... But is the max f-number the same for both TCs when zoom to the same focal length? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: There lor~
Posts: 4,848
|
Well for the 1.4TC, the 420mm is the max focal length, so that will be at F5.6 + 1 stop. for the 2xTC, at 420mm, the F-stop is not at F5.6 so you have to see what the F-stop at 210mm then + 2 stop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,126
|
TC should work similar like this
If your lens quality is very very sharp, with 1.4x TC , it should have very sharp quality with 2x TC , it should have sharp quality so imagine if you have sharp lens like 75-300mm , what should you get after using TC ? |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,407
|
Since my lens is sharp, with 1.4x TC , it should have quality. with 2x TC , it should have. correct? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: There lor~
Posts: 4,848
|
COME DOWN TO SEED TML! I'l bring both the 1.4TC and 2xTC then you judge for yourself! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
with 1.4x, okay only with 2x, sucks my point: dont bother using TC with that lens (btw, i own one, which i think it's not even considered sharp) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
|
If my lens is a 70-200 f2.8, will the 2X and 1.4X converters differ?
If the f stop remains unchanged, will the quality differ at 150mm on the lens, which is -210mm on the 1.4X ? -300mm on the 2X ? How about -210mm on the 1.4X (150mm on lens) and -210mm on the 2X (105mm on lens) Does the brand of the TC matter? I'm using a sigma lens EX HSM for canon, so should I go for canon or sigma TCs? Please advise....... Last edited by HelmetBox; 22nd October 2003 at 01:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
get the Sigma 1.4x APO EX. Reference: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/html/pages/70_200_ex.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
|
Oh, okay! Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
Posts: 1,014
|
__________________
S&S RDX-500D Set, S&S DX-1G, S&S YS-110 Alpha |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,126
|
Please take notes :
Kenko TCs support Canon-EOS, Nikon-AF-D, and Minolta-AF lens see http://www.thkphoto.com/products/kenko/slrc-01.html Sigma TCs support Sigma lens only (Sigma Canon-EOS mount, Sigma Nikon-AF-D mount, Sigma Minolta-AF mount and Sigma Pentax AF mount lens) see http://www.sigmaphoto.com/html/pages/ConvComptChart.htm Canon TCs support Canon L lens (fixed focal length lenses 135mm and longer (except the 135mm f/2.8 Softfocus lens), and the EF 70-200 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 70-200 f/4.0L, and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS zoom lenses ) only see http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/le...4x/ef_14x.html and http://www.usa.canon.com/eflenses/le..._2x/ef_2x.html |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
|
Okay, so in my understanding (Please do correct me if I'm wrong):
-The 1.4X TC will reduce effective aperture by 1 stop (2.8 -> 3.2) -The 2.0X TC will reduce effective aperture by 2 stops (2.8 -> 3.5) -need for f/stop compensation depends on coupled lens -Compatibility solely depends on TC type and manufacturer -Quality of 1.4X is better than 2X -Autofocus is only possible if the aperture of your lens is big to begin with as light reaching your sensors are reduced with the TC attached Am I on the right track? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
f/2.8 to f/5.6 -> 2 stops you multiply the aperture f number by sqrt(2) (which is 1.4) for one stop. that means you multiply by 2 for two stops.
![]() Last edited by mervlam; 22nd October 2003 at 06:24 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
Posts: 1,014
|
f/2.8 + 2 x = f/5.6 f/4 + 1.4x = f/5.6 f/4 + 2 x = f/8
__________________
S&S RDX-500D Set, S&S DX-1G, S&S YS-110 Alpha |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,312
|
![]() Now I know....... interesting. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|